Appalachia-Democratic Primary (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 07:31:30 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  Appalachia-Democratic Primary (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Appalachia-Democratic Primary  (Read 1805 times)
Adam Griffin
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,094
Greece


Political Matrix
E: -7.35, S: -6.26

« on: May 18, 2016, 05:09:07 AM »

By the broadest definition...

Logged
Adam Griffin
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,094
Greece


Political Matrix
E: -7.35, S: -6.26

« Reply #1 on: May 18, 2016, 07:01:55 PM »


Clinton, definitely, though by what amount remains to be seen. I did the easiest (and likely to be most pro-Sanders) portions of Appalachia and came up with the following:


PA, NY, MD & WV Portions:
Clinton 478,539 (48.34%)

Sanders 476,353 (48.13%)
Other 34,852 (3.53%)

OH, TN, VA, GA, AL & MS would all drag that number down, leaving only the portions of KY & NC to offset any losses. It's probably at or close to 60% Clinton once you factor in AL & MS (which aren't really Appalachia, but I digress).
Logged
Adam Griffin
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,094
Greece


Political Matrix
E: -7.35, S: -6.26

« Reply #2 on: May 18, 2016, 07:08:09 PM »

Probably only 55 percent Clinton since the south had far lower dem turnout.

Just adding the SC portion to the numbers took it from 48.3-48.1 to 49.4-47.3. There are a couple of larger counties in that, but still.
Logged
Adam Griffin
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,094
Greece


Political Matrix
E: -7.35, S: -6.26

« Reply #3 on: May 18, 2016, 07:26:34 PM »


I wonder what he's defining as "Appalachia"? It certainly is a much stricter measurement than what I'm using (which, granted, is the broadest definition of "Appalachia" there is).
Logged
Adam Griffin
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,094
Greece


Political Matrix
E: -7.35, S: -6.26

« Reply #4 on: May 18, 2016, 07:30:38 PM »

PA, NY, MD & WV Portions:
Clinton 478,539 (48.34%)
Sanders 476,353 (48.13%)
Other 34,852 (3.53%)

Adding in MS & SC produces:
Clinton 555,789 (50.66%)
Sanders 505,634 (46.09%)
Other 35,593 (3.24%)

Logged
Adam Griffin
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,094
Greece


Political Matrix
E: -7.35, S: -6.26

« Reply #5 on: May 18, 2016, 07:40:32 PM »


I wonder what he's defining as "Appalachia"? It certainly is a much stricter measurement than what I'm using (which, granted, is the broadest definition of "Appalachia" there is).

His definition of Appalachia

Not too fundamentally different outside of MS & AL.
Logged
Adam Griffin
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,094
Greece


Political Matrix
E: -7.35, S: -6.26

« Reply #6 on: May 18, 2016, 11:10:45 PM »
« Edited: May 18, 2016, 11:16:15 PM by President Griffin »


So now I can say with certainty: Clinton, by 11. Sanders won in WV, KY, NY & NC; Clinton elsewhere.

Final Result:
Clinton 53.85%
Sanders 42.97%
Others 3.19%



If you remove MS/AL (in reality, only a sliver of AL constitutes "Appalachia" in any meaningful sense; including the odder portions of the other states make much more sense relative to MS/AL), then Clinton wins by only 4:

Final Result (- AL & MS)Sad
Clinton 50.50%
Sanders 46.18%
Others 3.32%
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.042 seconds with 13 queries.