Opinion of AAD

[RR1997]

The better quality of serious and not serious discussions really shows you the better sides of a lot of posters. Almost everyone who posts there, my opinions of them have improved. I cannot name a single poster I think worse of after they post on AAD.

I had almost exactly the opposite experience.

I ask the same question to you as dead0man: What do you think about the fact the posters who make up the supposedly superior discussion here include a significant number who think that DONALD TRUMP will do better amongst the black vote than any Republican since the Civil Rights Act?

Who said this?

[Sprouts Farmers Market ✘]

The better quality of serious and not serious discussions really shows you the better sides of a lot of posters. Almost everyone who posts there, my opinions of them have improved. I cannot name a single poster I think worse of after they post on AAD.

I had almost exactly the opposite experience.

I ask the same question to you as dead0man: What do you think about the fact the posters who make up the supposedly superior discussion here include a significant number who think that DONALD TRUMP will do better amongst the black vote than any Republican since the Civil Rights Act?

In fairness, our trolling molded their opinion on that matter.

[Antonio the Sixth]

The better quality of serious and not serious discussions really shows you the better sides of a lot of posters. Almost everyone who posts there, my opinions of them have improved. I cannot name a single poster I think worse of after they post on AAD.

I had almost exactly the opposite experience.

I ask the same question to you as dead0man: What do you think about the fact the posters who make up the supposedly superior discussion here include a significant number who think that DONALD TRUMP will do better amongst the black vote than any Republican since the Civil Rights Act?

Considering the insane extent of Drumpfmania on AAD, I don't see how you can make a selling point of that.

[Sprouts Farmers Market ✘]

The better quality of serious and not serious discussions really shows you the better sides of a lot of posters. Almost everyone who posts there, my opinions of them have improved. I cannot name a single poster I think worse of after they post on AAD.

I had almost exactly the opposite experience.

I ask the same question to you as dead0man: What do you think about the fact the posters who make up the supposedly superior discussion here include a significant number who think that DONALD TRUMP will do better amongst the black vote than any Republican since the Civil Rights Act?

Considering the insane extent of Drumpfmania on AAD, I don't see how you can make a selling point of that.

Say what you will about who people support, but that doesn't make the site's analysis invalid. I'm sure you find the "Always Bernie" character that has popped up to be quite a serious individual capable of understanding political phenomena?

[Antonio the Sixth]

The better quality of serious and not serious discussions really shows you the better sides of a lot of posters. Almost everyone who posts there, my opinions of them have improved. I cannot name a single poster I think worse of after they post on AAD.

I had almost exactly the opposite experience.

I ask the same question to you as dead0man: What do you think about the fact the posters who make up the supposedly superior discussion here include a significant number who think that DONALD TRUMP will do better amongst the black vote than any Republican since the Civil Rights Act?

Considering the insane extent of Drumpfmania on AAD, I don't see how you can make a selling point of that.

Say what you will about who people support, but that doesn't make the site's analysis invalid. I'm sure you find the "Always Bernie" character that has popped up to be quite a serious individual capable of understanding political phenomena?

No, but neither do the troglodytes who spend pages and pages chanting their leader's name in all caps.

[I spent the winter writing songs about getting better]

The better quality of serious and not serious discussions really shows you the better sides of a lot of posters. Almost everyone who posts there, my opinions of them have improved. I cannot name a single poster I think worse of after they post on AAD.

I had almost exactly the opposite experience.

I ask the same question to you as dead0man: What do you think about the fact the posters who make up the supposedly superior discussion here include a significant number who think that DONALD TRUMP will do better amongst the black vote than any Republican since the Civil Rights Act?

Who said this?

https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=231408.0
https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=227202.0
https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=224245.0
https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=218530.0

[RR1997]

The better quality of serious and not serious discussions really shows you the better sides of a lot of posters. Almost everyone who posts there, my opinions of them have improved. I cannot name a single poster I think worse of after they post on AAD.

I had almost exactly the opposite experience.

I ask the same question to you as dead0man: What do you think about the fact the posters who make up the supposedly superior discussion here include a significant number who think that DONALD TRUMP will do better amongst the black vote than any Republican since the Civil Rights Act?

Who said this?

https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=231408.0
https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=227202.0
https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=224245.0
https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=218530.0

The last two threads are obviously jokes. Those are not serious threads.

The first thread was created by a newbie troll. Don't take that thread seriously.

I don't see anything wrong with the second thread. Most people were predicting that Trump would get 8%-15% of the black vote. I think that most people who posted on that thread were slightly overestimating Trump, but they were by no means predicting that Trump would 'better amongst the black vote than any Republican since the Civil Rights Act.'

[I spent the winter writing songs about getting better]

The better quality of serious and not serious discussions really shows you the better sides of a lot of posters. Almost everyone who posts there, my opinions of them have improved. I cannot name a single poster I think worse of after they post on AAD.

I had almost exactly the opposite experience.

I ask the same question to you as dead0man: What do you think about the fact the posters who make up the supposedly superior discussion here include a significant number who think that DONALD TRUMP will do better amongst the black vote than any Republican since the Civil Rights Act?

Who said this?

https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=231408.0
https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=227202.0
https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=224245.0
https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=218530.0

The last two threads are obviously jokes. Those are not serious threads.

The first thread was created by a newbie troll. Don't take that thread seriously.

I don't see anything wrong with the second thread. Most people were predicting that Trump would get 8%-15% of the black vote. I think that most people who posted on that thread were slightly overestimating Trump, but they were by no means predicting that Trump would 'better amongst the black vote than any Republican since the Civil Rights Act.'

And just today we had:

Van Jones thinks TRUMP may/will win 30% of the black vote.

[Edu]

[Bunwahaha [still dunno why, but well, so be it]]

Finally decided to have a look at it, well, didn't use exactly the same name, but not that far either, might tell more later, if that's approved then.

[I spent the winter writing songs about getting better]

The better quality of serious and not serious discussions really shows you the better sides of a lot of posters. Almost everyone who posts there, my opinions of them have improved. I cannot name a single poster I think worse of after they post on AAD.

I had almost exactly the opposite experience.

I ask the same question to you as dead0man: What do you think about the fact the posters who make up the supposedly superior discussion here include a significant number who think that DONALD TRUMP will do better amongst the black vote than any Republican since the Civil Rights Act?

Who said this?

Ooooh look at what I just found?

https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=230190.0

And look who posted it!

[RR1997]

The better quality of serious and not serious discussions really shows you the better sides of a lot of posters. Almost everyone who posts there, my opinions of them have improved. I cannot name a single poster I think worse of after they post on AAD.

I had almost exactly the opposite experience.

I ask the same question to you as dead0man: What do you think about the fact the posters who make up the supposedly superior discussion here include a significant number who think that DONALD TRUMP will do better amongst the black vote than any Republican since the Civil Rights Act?

Who said this?

Ooooh look at what I just found?

https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=230190.0

And look who posted it!

I said that Trump might do good for a Republican with African-Americans (because they might like his populist, anti-free trade message). I said that Trump would get around 11% of African-American voters (the same percentage Bush got in 2004).

I never ever said that he'd do better amongst African-Americans than any Republican since the Civil Rights Act.

[RR1997]

Besides, AAD is full of Trump hacks (unlike the Atlas Forum). There are plenty of unironic Trump supporters over there. I actually like AAD better, but still.

[I spent the winter writing songs about getting better]

Oh yes because blacks are going to completely ignore all of Trump's KKK and white supremacist connections because he said some things about trade they agree with.

You even said that Trump is going to attack Hillary for Birtherism, which makes zero sense since Trump used to be the most prominent Birther in America and Hillary was never a Birther, yes a few trolls who supported her campaign were. She herself was not. Also are we seeing blacks very upset at Hillary in the primary results?

[RR1997]

Oh yes because blacks are going to completely ignore all of Trump's KKK and white supremacist connections because he said some things about trade they agree with.

You even said that Trump is going to attack Hillary for Birtherism, which makes zero sense since Trump used to be the most prominent Birther in America and Hillary was never a Birther, yes a few trolls who supported her campaign were. She herself was not. Also are we seeing blacks very upset at Hillary in the primary results?

I took that comment back. I apologized for that stupid comment. We all say stupid things every once in a while. We all post stuff that we deeply regret every once in a while. It is called being human.

[I spent the winter writing songs about getting better]

Say what you will about AAD, we don't have a poster who's an open supporter of child pornography who made his sig a trashy pic of a porn star in order to "prove" that he's not a pedophile and is too dense to understand why some people especially those who browse the forum at school and work don't like that, and is now spamming at a Rochambeau-esque rate.

[President of the great nation of 🏳️‍⚧️]

Hasn't there been an opinion of AAD thread since March 2016?

[dead0man]

It's very important we don't forget....for some reason.

[fhtagn]

Say what you will about AAD, we don't have a poster who's an open supporter of child pornography who made his sig a trashy pic of a porn star in order to "prove" that he's not a pedophile and is too dense to understand why some people especially those who browse the forum at school and work don't like that, and is now spamming at a Rochambeau-esque rate.

Well, it's safe to say this is BRTD's new unhealthy obsession.

[I spent the winter writing songs about getting better]

Say what you will about AAD, we don't have a poster who's an open supporter of child pornography who made his sig a trashy pic of a porn star in order to "prove" that he's not a pedophile and is too dense to understand why some people especially those who browse the forum at school and work don't like that, and is now spamming at a Rochambeau-esque rate.

Well, it's safe to say this is BRTD's new unhealthy obsession.

If you look at the FF/HP poll results and the likes on a recent post of mine on AAD you can clearly see its not just me.

[fhtagn]

Say what you will about AAD, we don't have a poster who's an open supporter of child pornography who made his sig a trashy pic of a porn star in order to "prove" that he's not a pedophile and is too dense to understand why some people especially those who browse the forum at school and work don't like that, and is now spamming at a Rochambeau-esque rate.

Well, it's safe to say this is BRTD's new unhealthy obsession.

If you look at the FF/HP poll results and the likes on a recent post of mine on AAD you can clearly see its not just me.

Most of them aren't regularly posting about it. That's the difference.

[Mr. Morden]

Say what you will about AAD, we don't have a poster who's an open supporter of child pornography

If you're that upset about there being a poster here who thinks child pornography should be legal, I can only imagine how upset you'd be if this forum had a poster who thought adults having sex with kids should be legal.

Oh wait, never mind....

[DavidB.]

Has become a horrible forum. Don't plan on posting there anymore.

[Mr. Reactionary]

Say what you will about AAD, we don't have a poster who's an open supporter of child pornography who made his sig a trashy pic of a porn star in order to "prove" that he's not a pedophile and is too dense to understand why some people especially those who browse the forum at school and work don't like that, and is now spamming at a Rochambeau-esque rate.

Then stay there.

[America's Sweetheart ❤/𝕿𝖍𝖊 𝕭𝖔𝖔𝖙𝖞 𝖂𝖆𝖗𝖗𝖎𝖔𝖗]

Say what you will about AAD, we don't have a poster who's an open supporter of child pornography

If you're that upset about there being a poster here who thinks child pornography should be legal, I can only imagine how upset you'd be if this forum had a poster who though adults having sex with kids should be legal.

Oh wait, never mind....

See, I'm not so bad after all.