MO- Fort Hayes University: TRUMP and Clinton with small leads
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 29, 2024, 01:03:34 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
  MO- Fort Hayes University: TRUMP and Clinton with small leads
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: MO- Fort Hayes University: TRUMP and Clinton with small leads  (Read 2093 times)
Landslide Lyndon
px75
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,863
Greece


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: March 11, 2016, 01:17:30 PM »
« edited: March 11, 2016, 01:19:26 PM by Landslide Lyndon »

http://www.columbiatribune.com/news/politics/elections/clinton-trump-hold-narrow-leads-in-missouri-primary-poll/article_d2fbeb1d-f075-500b-800b-0578c70cc32a.html

Clinton            47
Sanders          40


Trump             36
Cruz                29
Rubio               9
Kasich              8


Beware of YUUUUGE MoE. It's 7-8%.
Logged
RI
realisticidealist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,780


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: 2.61

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: March 11, 2016, 01:24:41 PM »

Ah yes, the school that had Trump and Clinton ahead in Kansas.
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: March 11, 2016, 01:26:13 PM »

Ah yes, the school that had Trump and Clinton ahead in Kansas.

Wow, I didn't realize it was the same. And I was just about to take this poll seriously too. Dodged a bullet there.
Logged
Attorney General, Senator-Elect, & Former PPT Dwarven Dragon
Dwarven Dragon
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,720
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.42, S: -0.52

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: March 11, 2016, 01:38:00 PM »

Why do people think Sanders will win MO? It's Southern enough that Clinton will win it quite handily. I expect her to win the Black vote by the same margin as in NC.

Missouri is far less black than your average southern state, and the white vote could go either way. I don't entirely understand why, but I've always felt good about Bernie's chances in the state.
Logged
RJEvans
MasterRegal
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 496
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: March 11, 2016, 01:43:27 PM »

Why do people think Sanders will win MO? It's Southern enough that Clinton will win it quite handily. I expect her to win the Black vote by the same margin as in NC.

Missouri is far less black than your average southern state, and the white vote could go either way. I don't entirely understand why, but I've always felt good about Bernie's chances in the state.

She did lose the state in 2008 by 2 points. Wouldn't be surprised if she loses by 5 or wins by 5.
Logged
Starbucks Union Thug HokeyPuck
HockeyDude
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,376
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: March 11, 2016, 01:44:46 PM »

Half of this poll was taken before Bernie's dominating Michigan Miracle and the fine whuppin he laid at the debate.

GREAT NEWS!
Logged
Xing
xingkerui
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,280
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.52, S: -3.91

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: March 11, 2016, 01:47:56 PM »

MO is a cross-section of the Plains, the South, and the Midwest. It's winnable for Sanders because it has a relatively small black population, a decent number of white working class voters, and, most importantly, he's actually trying to win there. He did better in Northern Arkansas than the rest of the state, and he really didn't try to win AR.
Logged
Crumpets
Thinking Crumpets Crumpet
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,728
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.06, S: -6.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: March 11, 2016, 01:56:08 PM »

Half of this poll was taken before Bernie's dominating Michigan Miracle and the fine whuppin he laid at the debate.

GREAT NEWS!

What makes you so convinced that the Michigan result will have such a profound impact elsewhere? Most polls have shown the vast majority of voters deciding at least a few weeks before election day, and it's not like the remaining undecided were up all night on Tuesday pinning their vote on whoever won Michigan while completely ignoring the rest of the election. Not to mention the analysis that says that Sanders was helped in Michigan specifically because people were starting to see this as a non-competitive election as a whole. I don't know if Clinton will win Missouri, although I think she has a better than 50/50 shot, but Michigan will not have been the determining factor either way.
Logged
Likely Voter
Moderators
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,344


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: March 11, 2016, 01:56:13 PM »

I've always thought MO is Sanders best chance for a win followed by OH. But in both cases the delegates will be close to even. I think closing the gaps in IL, NC and FL is more important. Sanders can't let Clinton get anymore lopsided delegate hauls in medium and big states.   
Logged
Starbucks Union Thug HokeyPuck
HockeyDude
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,376
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: March 11, 2016, 01:59:35 PM »

Half of this poll was taken before Bernie's dominating Michigan Miracle and the fine whuppin he laid at the debate.

GREAT NEWS!

What makes you so convinced that the Michigan result will have such a profound impact elsewhere? Most polls have shown the vast majority of voters deciding at least a few weeks before election day, and it's not like the remaining undecided were up all night on Tuesday pinning their vote on whoever won Michigan while completely ignoring the rest of the election. Not to mention the analysis that says that Sanders was helped in Michigan specifically because people were starting to see this as a non-competitive election as a whole. I don't know if Clinton will win Missouri, although I think she has a better than 50/50 shot, but Michigan will not have been the determining factor either way.

In MO... it's all about the MO!  Woot!
Logged
#TheShadowyAbyss
TheShadowyAbyss
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,033
Palestinian Territory, Occupied


Political Matrix
E: -5.81, S: -3.64

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: March 11, 2016, 02:39:18 PM »

Based on their Kansas polling.... this must mean Sanders and Cruz are ahead.
Logged
mds32
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,090
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: March 11, 2016, 03:37:12 PM »

From this it looks like Cruz and Sanders have Missouri then lol
Logged
ProgressiveCanadian
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,690
Canada


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: March 11, 2016, 05:50:00 PM »

Based on their Kansas polling.... this must mean Sanders and Cruz are ahead.
Logged
Ebsy
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,001
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: March 11, 2016, 08:37:54 PM »

This poll was paid for by the newspapers of the state, so I hope they didn't waste their money on junk.
Logged
DrScholl
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,148
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.55, S: -3.30

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: March 11, 2016, 08:49:59 PM »

Sanders has a lot of angry white voters who hate Obama on lock, so he could win.
Logged
Xing
xingkerui
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,280
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.52, S: -3.91

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: March 11, 2016, 10:13:06 PM »


If we base this off of the Kansas polling, Sanders will win by 38, lol.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.041 seconds with 13 queries.