Wilder vs. Bush vs. Perot 1992
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 01:50:44 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Election What-ifs?
  Past Election What-ifs (US) (Moderator: Dereich)
  Wilder vs. Bush vs. Perot 1992
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Wilder vs. Bush vs. Perot 1992  (Read 990 times)
beaver2.0
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,775


Political Matrix
E: -2.45, S: -0.52

P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: February 25, 2016, 08:10:51 AM »

What would this be like, discuss with maps.
Logged
SingingAnalyst
mathstatman
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,637
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: February 25, 2016, 05:44:54 PM »


Douglas Wilder/Zell Miller 41% / 271 EV
George Bush/Dan Quayle 41% / 267 EV
Ross Perot / James Stockdale 17%
Logged
Obama-Biden Democrat
Zyzz
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,825


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: February 25, 2016, 06:41:12 PM »

I have doubts a black man could have gotten elected in 1992. I mean look at all the thinly veiled race baiting thrown at Obama, and that was a whole 15-20 years later. A majority of American's did not personally approve of interracial marriage until the late 1990's. Doug Wilder was not a bomb throwing black grievance candidate like Jesse Jackson, so he could appeal to white suburbanites like Obama did to his credit. I still don't know if he would have won though.
Logged
FEMA Camp Administrator
Cathcon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,304
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: February 28, 2016, 03:29:22 PM »

What makes Wilder a strange candidate to deal with was the fact that one of his most conservative points was, I wanna say, the death penalty and being tough-on-crime in general. As I recall, he was also pro-choice, so not terribly Jesus-y, which might, ironically, make him a good fit to appeal to suburbanites the way Clinton could/did. In his early campaigns, Wikipedia claims he made specific efforts to hit the backroads and build name recognition from rural and mountain voters. Applied to a general election campaign, that might be effective at countering whatever issues his race created. From the left, he would be vulnerable for his support for the death penalty and his cuts to higher education spending to restore Virginia's budget. From the right, Bush would attack him on his very candid abortion stance and his support for gun control. Could make for a very interesting election.
Logged
Sir Mohamed
MohamedChalid
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,703
United States



Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: March 18, 2016, 04:07:43 AM »

I think America was not quite ready for an African American in 1992, though the three-way race helps Dems a lot. However, the south remains Republican. Narrow win for Pappy Bush.




✓ President George Bush (R-TX)/Vice President Dan Quayle: 281 EV. (40.9%)
Former Governor Douglas Wilder (D-VA)/Senator Al Gore (D-TN): 253 EV. (38.5%)
Businessman Ross Perot (I-TX)/Admiral James Stockdale (I-CA): 4 EV. (20.4%)
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.036 seconds with 13 queries.