Who will win on Super Tuesday? (D)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 02, 2024, 11:06:34 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  Who will win on Super Tuesday? (D)
« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 [3]
Poll
Question: Predict who will win each state on March 1st? 6 Days
#1
Alabama - Clinton
 
#2
Alabama - Sanders
 
#3
Arkansas - Clinton
 
#4
Arkansas - Sanders
 
#5
Colorado - Clinton
 
#6
Colorado - Sanders
 
#7
Georgia - Clinton
 
#8
Georgia - Sanders
 
#9
Massachusetts - Clinton
 
#10
Massachusetts - Sanders
 
#11
Minnesota - Clinton
 
#12
Minnesota - Sanders
 
#13
Oklahoma - Clinton
 
#14
Oklahoma - Sanders
 
#15
Tennessee - Clinton
 
#16
Tennessee - Sanders
 
#17
Texas - Clinton
 
#18
Texas - Sanders
 
#19
Vermont - Clinton (lol)
 
#20
Vermont - Sanders
 
#21
Virginia - Clinton
 
#22
Virginia - Sanders
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 99

Calculate results by number of options selected
Author Topic: Who will win on Super Tuesday? (D)  (Read 7512 times)
Ebsy
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,001
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #50 on: February 28, 2016, 03:20:07 PM »

Sanders actually has a better chance to win all the states than Clinton, since Vermont will be the biggest win in terms of %. Sanders will do better in Vermont than Clinton does in Arkansas.
They actually have equal probability of winning all the states: 0.
Logged
Former Senator Haslam2020
Haslam2020
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,345
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #51 on: February 28, 2016, 03:27:18 PM »

Sanders wins Colorado, Minnesota, and Vermont. I have serious doubts about Massachusetts, but it is possible. Oklahoma is tossup leaning Clinton.
Logged
°Leprechaun
tmcusa2
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,253
Uruguay


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #52 on: February 28, 2016, 04:47:55 PM »

If it's 6-5 Clinton Sanders, this could still be very good for Clinton overall. The six states will likely be double digit wins and many or most of them 60-40 or better. Except for VT the other Sanders states, if he wins them, will be close. This could make it unlikely that he will get the nomination. I think he not only has to beat expectations but beat them more than is likely. After that the only thing that could turn it around for him is to win 3 or 4 of the next big states, MI,FL,OH&IL. So, it isn't looking good for Sanders, and based on expectations I can understand the optimism of Clinton supporters here. There haven't been a lot of polls, however, but the current ones could spell doom for Sanders. He would easily beat Trump, so this is all really bad news. A 60-40 in Texas is the most critical. Texas alone is much more critical, assuming this will be the result, than SC was. SC only was seen as a turning point because of the calendar. In the end, it didn't matter that much.
Logged
JMT
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,148


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #53 on: February 28, 2016, 05:07:22 PM »

Sanders Victories: Vermont, Massachusetts, Minnesota
Clinton Victories: Alabama, Arkansas, Colorado, Georgia, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia.
Logged
The Other Castro
Castro2020
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,230
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #54 on: February 28, 2016, 05:19:11 PM »

I'm pretty pessimistic about Sanders after SC, so I'll say he wins VT, MN, and CO. I'm not even too confident about CO now, and the lack of MN polling is worrying as well. He should just drop out if he only wins 2 states.
Logged
SunSt0rm
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 624
Netherlands


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #55 on: February 28, 2016, 05:25:27 PM »
« Edited: February 28, 2016, 05:32:21 PM by SunSt0rm »

Sanders: Vermont, Minnesota
Clinton: Alabama, Arkansas, Colorado (early registration kill Sanders win), Georgia, Massachusetts (Can go any way, but give slight advantage to Hillary), Oklahoma, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia.
Logged
Ogre Mage
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,505
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.39, S: -5.22

P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #56 on: February 29, 2016, 01:29:25 AM »

Sanders:  Vermont, Minnesota, Colorado

Clinton:  Texas, Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Tennessee and Virginia will be huge blowout wins for Clinton.  Oklahoma and Massachusetts are the toughest calls, I say she wins them narrowly.
Logged
Holmes
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,786
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -5.74

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #57 on: February 29, 2016, 01:37:02 AM »

I'm pretty pessimistic about Sanders after SC, so I'll say he wins VT, MN, and CO. I'm not even too confident about CO now, and the lack of MN polling is worrying as well. He should just drop out if he only wins 2 states.
For a state that has pretty liberal voting laws, the Colorado caucuses are pretty restrictive. That said, Democrats only and no voter registration at the door. You have to have been registered as a Democrat by January 4th, 2016, and 17 year olds that will be 18 on election day are not allowed to participate. I think all those restrictions lead to a victory for the candidate that has consistently won Democrats in exit polls.
Logged
ElectionsGuy
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,102
United States


Political Matrix
E: 7.10, S: -7.65

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #58 on: February 29, 2016, 04:11:33 PM »

Last Calls?
Logged
The Other Castro
Castro2020
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,230
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #59 on: February 29, 2016, 04:22:06 PM »

Sanders: Vermont, Minnesota, Oklahoma, and a close loss in Colorado.
Logged
Xing
xingkerui
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,318
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.52, S: -3.91

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #60 on: February 29, 2016, 04:22:20 PM »

Well, I've revised my prediction now. I think Clinton narrowly wins MA, and Sanders narrowly wins CO and OK.
Logged
°Leprechaun
tmcusa2
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,253
Uruguay


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #61 on: February 29, 2016, 11:29:20 PM »

Well, I've revised my prediction now. I think Clinton narrowly wins MA, and Sanders narrowly wins CO and OK.
Polls look close in MA, but Clinton seems to have the edge.
Logged
°Leprechaun
tmcusa2
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,253
Uruguay


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #62 on: February 29, 2016, 11:31:50 PM »

Oklahoma seems to be very close. I don't know Clinton is doing so much better (on Atlas) in that state.
Logged
ElectionsGuy
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,102
United States


Political Matrix
E: 7.10, S: -7.65

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #63 on: March 01, 2016, 06:34:07 PM »

Locking.
Logged
ElectionsGuy
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,102
United States


Political Matrix
E: 7.10, S: -7.65

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #64 on: March 02, 2016, 07:27:50 AM »

Alabama: 100% Clinton
Arkansas: 99% Clinton, 1% Sanders
Colorado: 71% Sanders, 29% Clinton
Georgia: 100% Clinton
Massachusetts: 56% Sanders, 44% Clinton
Minnesota: 79% Sanders, 21% Clinton
Oklahoma: 69% Clinton, 31% Sanders
Tennessee: 96% Clinton, 4% Sanders
Texas: 98% Clinton, 2% Sanders
Vermont: 96% Sanders, 4% Clinton
Virginia: 95% Clinton, 5% Sanders
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.043 seconds with 12 queries.