49-state sweep. Holdout? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 26, 2024, 01:54:03 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Presidential Election Trends (Moderator: 100% pro-life no matter what)
  49-state sweep. Holdout? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Between now and 2040 someone wins in a 49-state landslide. Which state is the lone holdout?
#1
California
 
#2
New York
 
#3
Utah
 
#4
Vermont
 
#5
West Virginia
 
#6
other
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 84

Author Topic: 49-state sweep. Holdout?  (Read 4788 times)
Virginiá
Virginia
Administratrix
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,892
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -6.97, S: -5.91

WWW
« on: February 24, 2016, 03:36:48 PM »
« edited: February 24, 2016, 03:39:17 PM by Virginia »

I think with these you almost have to pick a state with a long-standing loyalty to that party.  There's no way in hell WV is the last GOP holdout even if it was solidly behind McCain and Romney (or should we say against Obama), and there's no way VT is one of the last Democratic ones.  I think a state like UT is probably the best choice for the GOP (voted solidly for Reagan and Romney almost 30 years apart ... It's a very Republican state), and MD or MA are good for the Dems.

That's a great point. MD/MA seem like excellent candidates at this point in time, though without the partisan history, I'd also think NY/CA fit in too (for dems)

However, historically the only region with electoral votes that couldn't be flipped in a landslide is DC (so not a state). Other than that, MD/MA both fell to GOP landslides at one point or another.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.025 seconds with 14 queries.