PPP: Clinton leads 10 of 12 Super Tuesday and beyond states

[RI]

http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/pdf/2015/March2016PrimariesPollingProject.pdf

Alabama: Clinton +28
Arkansas: Clinton +25
Georgia: Clinton +34
Louisiana: Clinton +31
Massachusetts: Sanders +7
Michigan: Clinton +10
Mississippi: Clinton +34
Oklahoma: Clinton +2
Tennessee: Clinton +26
Texas: Clinton +23
Virginia: Clinton +22
Vermont: Sanders +76

[Gass3268]

Alabama
Clinton 59%
Sanders 31%

Arkansas
Clinton 57%
Sanders 32%

Georgia
Clinton 60%
Sanders 26%

Massachusetts
Sanders 49%
Clinton 42%

Michigan
Clinton 50%
Sanders 40%

Mississippi
Clinton 60%
Sanders 26%

Oklahoma
Clinton 46%
Sanders 44%

Tennessee
Clinton 58%
Sanders 32%

Texas
Clinton 57%
Sanders 34%

Virginia
Clinton 56%
Sanders 34%

Vermont
Sanders 86%
Clinton 10%

PPP for on behalf of American Family Voices

[Maxwell]

Interesting Sanders is doing that well here in Oklahoma. Probably due to two things - the utter decimation of conservative Democrats, and Sanders striking a populist nerve that isn't really struck any more down here.

Also lol at that Vermont lead for Sanders - talk about a WHOPPING.

[RI]

Interesting that they didn't poll any of the caucus states.

[The Other Castro]

So they didn't poll the Super Tuesday caucus states Coloado and Minnesota, which Sanders should be ahead in if he's doing that well in Oklahoma and Massachusetts. It's looking like he may be able to win 5 states on Super Tuesday after all.

[Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers]

Sanders is probably not gonna win, minorities are galvanized to vote  for Clinton , since the Scalia death

[Skye]

Wow, Bernie is winning Vermont by a ridiculous margin. Also, he's leading in Massachusetts, which I thought would lean towards Hillary.

[The Free North]

So they didn't poll the Super Tuesday caucus states Coloado and Minnesota, which Sanders should be ahead in if he's doing that well in Oklahoma and Massachusetts. It's looking like he may be able to win 5 states on Super Tuesday after all.

No one likes polling caucus states, but Sanders should play well there.

[Gass3268]

5 Super Tuesday wins means he'd win half of the states (or a little less than half if you count American Samoa, no idea who's going to win there).

Also they didn't poll the Kansas, Maine, and Nebraska caucuses.

[Starbucks Union Thug HokeyPuck]

Commissioned by American Family Voices - chairman Mike Lux - 1992 Clinton campaign staff and transition team.  Performed by Hillary-sabre-rattlers PPP.  And let's go ahead and forget about MN and CO. 

Yeah...

[Holmes]

Oklahoma Democrats were so racist towards Obama.

[Gass3268]

Commissioned by American Family Voices - chairman Mike Lux - 1992 Clinton campaign staff and transition team.  Performed by Hillary-sabre-rattlers PPP.  And let's go ahead and forget about MN and CO. 

Yeah...

Still not bad results out of Massachusetts, Oklahoma, or even Michigan.

[Maxwell]

Oklahoma Democrats were so racist towards Obama.

Edwards probably would've won Oklahoma if he had stayed in long enough.

[DrScholl]

Clinton leads almost everywhere, yet these are supposedly great numbers for Sanders. Such logic.

[Gass3268]

Clinton leads almost everywhere, yet these are supposedly great numbers for Sanders. Such logic.

Sanders was never going to win in the South. It's amazing he's even close in Oklahoma. All Sanders has to do is survive the early wave of Southern states and then fight it out elsewhere.

[DrScholl]

Clinton leads almost everywhere, yet these are supposedly great numbers for Sanders. Such logic.

Sanders was never going to win in the South. It's amazing he's even close in Oklahoma.

Not really, since Clinton being a member of Obama's cabinet makes her to close to him. Those people are still voting against Obama.

[The Other Castro]

Clinton leads almost everywhere, yet these are supposedly great numbers for Sanders. Such logic.

He's probably going to win the caucuses in Minnesota and Colorado with these numbers, and even PPP is showing him leading or basically tied in 5 Super Tuesday states. Wasn't this supposed to be where Clinton dominates and ends Sanders? I wouldn't call a split dominating.

[Gass3268]

Clinton leads almost everywhere, yet these are supposedly great numbers for Sanders. Such logic.

Given that he's probably going to win the caucuses in Minnesota and Colorado with these numbers, even PPP is showing him leading or basically tied in 5 Super Tuesday states. Wasn't this supposed to be where Clinton dominates and ends Sanders? I wouldn't call a split dominating.

Don't you know, those states don't count! Same with Kansas, Maine, and Nebraska.

[Starbucks Union Thug HokeyPuck]

Clinton leads almost everywhere, yet these are supposedly great numbers for Sanders. Such logic.

Given that he's probably going to win the caucuses in Minnesota and Colorado with these numbers, even PPP is showing him leading or basically tied in 5 Super Tuesday states. Wasn't this supposed to be where Clinton dominates and ends Sanders? I wouldn't call a split dominating.

Don't you know, those states don't count! Same with Kansas, Maine, and Nebraska.

Those state caucuses that Obama won in a landslide are just racist hellholes that should be purged from the party, you see.

[Attorney General, Senator-Elect, & Former PPT Dwarven Dragon]

Clinton leads almost everywhere, yet these are supposedly great numbers for Sanders. Such logic.

He's probably going to win the caucuses in Minnesota and Colorado with these numbers, and even PPP is showing him leading or basically tied in 5 Super Tuesday states. Wasn't this supposed to be where Clinton dominates and ends Sanders? I wouldn't call a split dominating.

8-5 (AS and Democrats Abroad will vote for Clinton) is  not what Sanders needs though. He needs to get one of TN and VA as well. This poll makes that look tough, though other companies are showing VA much closer.

[I Will Not Be Wrong]

Great news for Clinton!

[DrScholl]

Clinton leads almost everywhere, yet these are supposedly great numbers for Sanders. Such logic.

Given that he's probably going to win the caucuses in Minnesota and Colorado with these numbers, even PPP is showing him leading or basically tied in 5 Super Tuesday states. Wasn't this supposed to be where Clinton dominates and ends Sanders? I wouldn't call a split dominating.

As far as delegate counts go, Sanders is way behind as it is, so a blowout in several states is hardly good. I wouldn't call that a blowout for Sanders.

And out of these polls he's only leading in two states and only basically tied in one, which equals three not five.

[Lief 🗽]

Clinton leads almost everywhere, yet these are supposedly great numbers for Sanders. Such logic.

He's probably going to win the caucuses in Minnesota and Colorado with these numbers, and even PPP is showing him leading or basically tied in 5 Super Tuesday states. Wasn't this supposed to be where Clinton dominates and ends Sanders? I wouldn't call a split dominating.

These numbers would still give Clinton a huge delegate lead though.

[Starbucks Union Thug HokeyPuck]

Honestly, Texas is the only disappointing thing here.  But I want to see another poll.  I never thought Clinton was in trouble anywhere in the EST South.

[Starbucks Union Thug HokeyPuck]

Clinton leads almost everywhere, yet these are supposedly great numbers for Sanders. Such logic.

He's probably going to win the caucuses in Minnesota and Colorado with these numbers, and even PPP is showing him leading or basically tied in 5 Super Tuesday states. Wasn't this supposed to be where Clinton dominates and ends Sanders? I wouldn't call a split dominating.

8-5 (AS and Democrats Abroad will vote for Clinton) is  not what Sanders needs though. He needs to get one of TN and VA as well. This poll makes that look tough, though other companies are showing VA much closer.

Two of those eight aren't Super Tues states.