Is Frist done for '08 ?!?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 12:17:18 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2008 Elections
  Is Frist done for '08 ?!?
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2
Poll
Question: Is Frist done for '08 ?!?
#1
Yes
 
#2
No
 
#3
To early to tell
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 35

Author Topic: Is Frist done for '08 ?!?  (Read 2786 times)
MAS117
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,206
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: May 23, 2005, 11:33:23 PM »

Is Frist done for '08 ?!?
Logged
Bleeding heart conservative, HTMLdon
htmldon
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,983
United States


Political Matrix
E: 1.03, S: -2.26

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: May 23, 2005, 11:37:59 PM »

No.
Logged
Smash255
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,451


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: May 24, 2005, 12:07:00 AM »

For winning the election?  Yes, but that has been the case.  For winning the primary? No
Logged
J. J.
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,892
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: May 24, 2005, 12:16:15 AM »

I seriously doubt he was ever not done.  His stock might have gone up with the hard right/evangelicals, but I still have not seen any evidence that the deliver primaries.

Pat Robertson (despite early success) and Gary Bauer never ran strongly.  At best, Frist fades in Iowa.
Logged
A18
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,794
Political Matrix
E: 9.23, S: -6.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: May 24, 2005, 12:17:39 AM »

Frist never had a chance at the nomination. In the general, he could beat a far-left extremist like Evan Bayh, but not many other people.
Logged
Smash255
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,451


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: May 24, 2005, 12:19:43 AM »

Frist never had a chance at the nomination. In the general, he could beat a far-left extremist like Evan Bayh, but not many other people.

Bayh would absolutley wipe the floor with Frist & eat him for lunch.  It would be a rather boring election that Frist would be demolished in
Logged
A18
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,794
Political Matrix
E: 9.23, S: -6.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: May 24, 2005, 12:20:26 AM »

No, Frist would win about 54-45, carrying about 44 states.
Logged
Smash255
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,451


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: May 24, 2005, 12:27:02 AM »

No, Frist would win about 54-45, carrying about 44 states.

I nominate this for stupidest post award
Logged
A18
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,794
Political Matrix
E: 9.23, S: -6.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: May 24, 2005, 12:34:02 AM »

Well, Utah and DC could go either way, but my guess is they'd both be in the solid Frist column. Anyway, even if they do swing Bayh in some unlikely circumstance, that's still 42 states for Frist. So not far off.
Logged
J. J.
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,892
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: May 24, 2005, 01:48:47 AM »

No, Frist would win about 54-45, carrying about 44 states.

I nominate this for stupidest post award

A18 is making a joke, obviously.  An a rather funny one too.  :-)

Frist probably helped himself, a bit, for the nomination, but not much.  He'll try running in 2008 as the "conservative" candidate.
Logged
opebo
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 47,009


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: May 24, 2005, 01:52:29 AM »

Frist would be acceptable to the religious right, and therefore has very good prospects for the nomination in 2008.
Logged
J. J.
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,892
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: May 24, 2005, 02:18:29 AM »

Frist would be acceptable to the religious right, and therefore has very good prospects for the nomination in 2008.

You mean like President Pat Robertson and President Gary Bauer, not to mention President Pat Buchannan?
Logged
opebo
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 47,009


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: May 24, 2005, 02:27:15 AM »

Frist would be acceptable to the religious right, and therefore has very good prospects for the nomination in 2008.

You mean like President Pat Robertson and President Gary Bauer, not to mention President Pat Buchannan?

I said quite clearly 'acceptable to' - such as President George W. Bush.
Logged
A18
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,794
Political Matrix
E: 9.23, S: -6.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: May 24, 2005, 02:28:36 AM »

Those people were more acceptable to. They didn't win the nomination.
Logged
MaC
Milk_and_cereal
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,787


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: May 24, 2005, 02:31:12 AM »

Frist never had a chance at the nomination. In the general, he could beat a far-left extremist like Evan Bayh, but not many other people.

Bayh would absolutley wipe the floor with Frist & eat him for lunch.  It would be a rather boring election that Frist would be demolished in

eww, why would Bayh eat something that's been wiped on the floor?  It'd be a boring election because both candidates are boring speakers.
That said, Bayh would probably win.
Logged
opebo
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 47,009


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: May 24, 2005, 02:32:25 AM »

Those people were more acceptable to. They didn't win the nomination.

Those people were absolute nobodies.
Logged
A18
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,794
Political Matrix
E: 9.23, S: -6.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: May 24, 2005, 02:33:45 AM »

They were nobodies because no one voted for them. They did not receive no votes because they were nobodies.
Logged
opebo
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 47,009


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: May 24, 2005, 03:13:45 AM »

They were nobodies because no one voted for them. They did not receive no votes because they were nobodies.

No, they had never held any elective office or had any important executive role in society whatsoever.
Logged
A18
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,794
Political Matrix
E: 9.23, S: -6.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: May 24, 2005, 03:14:26 AM »

What does that have to do with how acceptable they are to the religious?
Logged
opebo
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 47,009


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: May 24, 2005, 03:21:20 AM »

What does that have to do with how acceptable they are to the religious?

Quite a lot, since there were other extreme religious social intolerants available to vote for who had executive experience, national standing, etc.
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: May 24, 2005, 03:22:18 AM »

Those people were more acceptable to. They didn't win the nomination.
"acceptable to", but not "of". Like Bush. Unlike Bauer. Someone "of" the hardcore religious right would not be acceptable to large swathes of the party's middle ground.
Logged
A18
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,794
Political Matrix
E: 9.23, S: -6.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: May 24, 2005, 03:26:33 AM »

Those people were more acceptable to. They didn't win the nomination.
"acceptable to", but not "of". Like Bush. Unlike Bauer. Someone "of" the hardcore religious right would not be acceptable to large swathes of the party's middle ground.

According to opedo, it's the Religious Party. The religious are all the matters.
Logged
opebo
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 47,009


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: May 24, 2005, 03:28:14 AM »

Those people were more acceptable to. They didn't win the nomination.
"acceptable to", but not "of". Like Bush. Unlike Bauer. Someone "of" the hardcore religious right would not be acceptable to large swathes of the party's middle ground.

According to opedo, it's the Religious Party. The religious are all the matters.

Yes, in primaries they are the key.
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: May 24, 2005, 03:28:55 AM »

Those people were more acceptable to. They didn't win the nomination.
"acceptable to", but not "of". Like Bush. Unlike Bauer. Someone "of" the hardcore religious right would not be acceptable to large swathes of the party's middle ground.

According to opedo, it's the Religious Party. The religious are all the matters.
Sometimes. Not in the above quote.
Logged
Democratic Hawk
LucysBeau
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,703
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: -2.58, S: 2.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #24 on: May 24, 2005, 08:26:46 AM »

Too early to tell - but personally, I say Frist 'go for it' because he'll be a dream opponent for many Democrats

Dave
Logged
Pages: [1] 2  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.045 seconds with 14 queries.