Rice/Allen vs Clinton/Warner

[Reaganfan]

WELL???

[bgwah]

443-95 Clinton, assuming independents/3rd parties don't do better than normal (which they probably would!)

[tarheel-leftist85]

Rice would win.  She'd shore up the base with Allen on the ticket, though the resulting map would be interesting (can even picture it).  Why should Dems. pick a mediocre Senator as the chief executive, and a successful executive as President of the Senate?  I've been around enough women to know she wouldn't even carry the women's vote.
Though I can't picture a map, I can see the PV being 48% Condi, 46% Hillary, 6% Other (esp. in MS, GA, AL, SC, LA).  SC primaries could be last, but I think they'd select the nominee for the other party.  Of course will let a cold state tell us, unless we regain our common sense.  Sorry, I don't see this match-up.

[SMOT]

Clinton would win again. Not with 443 though. She can carry all of the liberal states by a lot, and by just being her, she can pick up enough battleground states. I don't think Rice can hold the party together to only vote for her.

[Democratic Hawk]

Too close to call depending on whether:

1) Condi makes significant inroads in the Black vote

2) Hillary will attract a greater share of the 'Dixie' White vote

Dave

[No more McShame]

Too close to call depending on whether:

1) Condi makes significant inroads in the Black vote

2) Hillary will attract a greater share of the 'Dixie' White vote

Dave

1) Even a 10% jump would be huge.  That's about as high as I would expect.

2) No way especially with Allen on the ticket.

[MODU]

I don't see Condi being a Presidential pick, though it would be interesting to see how she would perform.  Allen would not be her VP.