WND/Clout National: Trump 40%, Cruz 24%, Rubio 10%

[yankeesfan]

I hesitate to post this poll because of the source, but here it is:

http://www.wnd.com/files/2015/12/WND12-2015Q3.pdf

For GOP voters,
Trump 39.5
Cruz 23.6
Rubio 10.4
Carson 9.6
Bush 5.8
Christie 3.8
Fiorina 2.2
Kasich 1.9
Paul presumably non-existent

[weixiaobao]

Pretty similar to all of the polls about the same time.  We have seen both online and phone polls that provide Trump's #s close to that.

[mds32]

I hesitate to post this poll because of the source, but here it is:

http://www.wnd.com/files/2015/12/WND12-2015Q3.pdf

For GOP voters,
Trump 39.5
Cruz 23.6
Rubio 10.4
Carson 9.6
Bush 5.8
Christie 3.8
Fiorina 2.2
Kasich 1.9
Paul presumeabley non-existent

Their cheer-leading in their article about how Trump is "winning" minorities in the GOP wasn't helpful at all.

[weixiaobao]

Their cheer-leading in their article about how Trump is "winning" minorities in the GOP wasn't helpful at all.

Well this is a phone poll, and not an online website poll of their readers.
Unless, they fixed the #s and or asking really weird interview questions.  It doesn't really matter about what articles they have written.

[Absentee Voting Ghost of Ruin]

Their cheer-leading in their article about how Trump is "winning" minorities in the GOP wasn't helpful at all.

Well this is a phone poll, and not an online website poll of their readers.
Unless, they fixed the #s and or asking really weird interview questions.  It doesn't really matter about what articles they have written.

Given what little I recall of WND, it could be a paid advertisement masquerading as a poll.

[weixiaobao]

Their cheer-leading in their article about how Trump is "winning" minorities in the GOP wasn't helpful at all.

Well this is a phone poll, and not an online website poll of their readers.
Unless, they fixed the #s and or asking really weird interview questions.  It doesn't really matter about what articles they have written.

Given what little I recall of WND, it could be a paid advertisement masquerading as a poll.

I am not familiar with them.  More info?

I remember how I dismiss a poll by an organization (Club for Growth) that actively buying anti Trump ads as bias.  Turn out, every single Iowa after that polls show Carson leading.  So I tried to be a bit more open minded.  But who know, maybe you are right.

[Lief 🗽]

Gorgeous poll!

[Oak Hills]

Their cheer-leading in their article about how Trump is "winning" minorities in the GOP wasn't helpful at all.

Well this is a phone poll, and not an online website poll of their readers.
Unless, they fixed the #s and or asking really weird interview questions.  It doesn't really matter about what articles they have written.

Given what little I recall of WND, it could be a paid advertisement masquerading as a poll.

I am not familiar with them.  More info?

It's a lunatic right-wing "news" site.
http://www.wnd.com
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WorldNetDaily

[The Other Castro]

WND: Weapons of Nasty Destruction