NH-PPP: New Hampshire doesn't appear to be a battleground state
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 26, 2024, 05:23:42 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
  NH-PPP: New Hampshire doesn't appear to be a battleground state
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: NH-PPP: New Hampshire doesn't appear to be a battleground state  (Read 5142 times)
MT Treasurer
IndyRep
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,275
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: August 26, 2015, 01:55:20 PM »
« edited: August 26, 2015, 02:06:27 PM by TNvolunteer »

Kasich/Clinton: 43/41
Clinton/Trump: 46/44
Clinton/Fiorina: 45/42
Clinton/Paul: 47/37 (lol)
Clinton/Cruz: 49/38
Clinton/Huckabee: 49/36
Clinton/Bush: 46/39
Clinton/Christie: 46/38
Clinton/Rubio: 47/39
Clinton/Walker: 47/39
Clinton/Carson: 48/40
Sanders/Bush: 46/38
Sanders/Walker: 47/39
Sanders/Trump: 50/41
Sanders/Rubio: 48/35
Clinton/Trump/Bush: 43/28/22

http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/main/2015/08/ayottehassan-a-toss-up-clintonsanders-generally-lead-gop-field.html
Logged
Figueira
84285
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,173


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: August 26, 2015, 02:05:25 PM »

I guess the libertarians in New Hampshire are mostly people who vote Republican anyway, or they (correctly) don't see Rand Paul as a real libertarian.

But I hope these polls hold up; I prefer it when New Hampshire votes Democratic.
Logged
○∙◄☻tπ[╪AV┼cV└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,849


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: August 26, 2015, 02:16:34 PM »

Sanders is certainly more electable in NH. Compared to Hillary, he's +1 against Bush, +7 against Trump, +5 against Rubio, and the same against Walker.
Logged
Figueira
84285
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,173


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: August 26, 2015, 02:20:55 PM »

Sanders is certainly more electable in NH. Compared to Hillary, he's +1 against Bush, +7 against Trump, +5 against Rubio, and the same against Walker.

Makes sense, considering that next door, he even won a decent number of Bush and Romney voters. Of course, Vermont=/=New Hampshire, but they do have some similarities.
Logged
Sprouts Farmers Market ✘
Sprouts
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,786
Italy


Political Matrix
E: -4.90, S: 1.74

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: August 26, 2015, 02:23:14 PM »

B-b-b-b-b-b-but Free Bird and Larry Sabato told me New Hampshire is a super-duper-mega-ultra-turbo-elastic-libertarian-and-independent swing state! Cry

Look at who the potential nominees are: Kasich, Trump, Rubio. Close to 80% chance it will be one of them. Being within MOE on 2 out of 3 (including one lead) is pretty swingy. Of course Hillary is beating the trash.
Logged
Phony Moderate
Obamaisdabest
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,298
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: August 26, 2015, 02:30:43 PM »

Any state in which Hillary is currently under 50% is a battleground state, or has the potential to be one.
Logged
pbrower2a
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,854
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: August 26, 2015, 02:51:13 PM »

For her this is an improvement against any Republican.

Is the e-mail controversy imploding? If so, the recent 'downer' polls for her will soon become irrelevant, and we will see much more red on the polling maps.
Logged
Ljube
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,086
Political Matrix
E: 2.71, S: -6.09

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: August 26, 2015, 03:04:14 PM »
« Edited: August 26, 2015, 03:05:52 PM by Ljube »

For her this is an improvement against any Republican.

Is the e-mail controversy imploding? If so, the recent 'downer' polls for her will soon become irrelevant, and we will see much more red on the polling maps.

In your dreams!

The e-mail controversy as you call it leaves us with only two possible conclusions:

1) Either she did it for convenience, without thinking about consequences, which makes her incompetent
2) Or she did it on purpose which makes her corrupt

In any case, she is unfit to become President.

The general public is still largely unaware of this scandal, but the more people get to know this, the lower her numbers will be.
Logged
Free Bird
TheHawk
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,917
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.84, S: -5.48

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: August 26, 2015, 03:18:03 PM »

B-b-b-b-b-b-but Free Bird and Larry Sabato told me New Hampshire is a super-duper-mega-ultra-turbo-elastic-libertarian-and-independent swing state! Cry

It is. You're taking a PPP seriously.
Logged
Xing
xingkerui
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,312
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.52, S: -3.91

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: August 26, 2015, 03:26:56 PM »

Looking at some of the numbers, New Hampshire absolutely appears to be a battleground.
Logged
Likely Voter
Moderators
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,344


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: August 26, 2015, 03:35:25 PM »

Looking at some of the numbers, New Hampshire absolutely appears to be a battleground.

I still think it could end up being the battleground. A very plausble scenario is GOP candidate (possibly Kasich/Rubio ticket) picks up leads in FL,OH,CO and IA. The Hillary/Kaine ticket picks up leads in PA, WI, NV and VA.   That leaves NH as the ultimate tipping point.   There could be a case where they end up spending as much in NH as the do in larger states like IA or even CO.
Logged
Mehmentum
Icefire9
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,600
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: August 26, 2015, 03:37:51 PM »

Um, so Trump is actually doing better than nearly every other Republican in NH.  That's weird and worrying.
Logged
Skye
yeah_93
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,587
Venezuela


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: August 26, 2015, 04:28:46 PM »

Just because Bush is doing poorly doesn't mean this isn't going to be competitive. Look at Kasich. For Christ's sake look at Trump.
Logged
Landslide Lyndon
px75
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,039
Greece


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: August 26, 2015, 04:37:41 PM »

The people love a winner and right now Trump looks invincible.
Logged
madelka
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 328
United States
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: August 26, 2015, 04:52:32 PM »

Republicans won't lose NH by 10 points, but they won't win it either.
Logged
Kingpoleon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,144
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: August 26, 2015, 09:41:49 PM »

... If the swing nationwide for Kasich is R+7.78%, he swings the map to look like this:



336 - 202
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,623
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: August 26, 2015, 10:56:31 PM »

The thread title should be "New Hampshire won't be a battleground... if Sanders is nominated".

Hillary is only beating Trump by 2%. That's hilarious.
Logged
ElectionsGuy
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,102
United States


Political Matrix
E: 7.10, S: -7.65

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: August 27, 2015, 05:23:26 AM »

B-b-b-b-b-b-but Free Bird and Larry Sabato told me New Hampshire is a super-duper-mega-ultra-turbo-elastic-libertarian-and-independent swing state! Cry

Its certainly very elastic and independent, but its not libertarian. I don't know where you got that, and Larry Sabato has never said that.

What I'm shocked at here (besides the Democrats doing very well) is Sanders' lead. Not only is he winning in the primary, he's winning easily in the general. Kind of a wake up call to see that he's just as electable (or in some cases, even more) than Clinton when months ago many (including myself) wrote him off as much less electable.
Logged
Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 89,780
Jamaica
Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: August 27, 2015, 06:35:31 AM »

CLINTON v Trump NH 52-46

CLINTON V Jeb NH 50-47
Logged
pbrower2a
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,854
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: August 27, 2015, 08:47:57 AM »

Republicans won't lose NH by 10 points, but they won't win it either.

Except during the LBJ landslide (the state was one of two that went to Landon in 1936!), Republicans haven't lost New Hampshire by 10%. They got close to doing so in 2008. 
Logged
Crumpets
Thinking Crumpets Crumpet
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,814
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.06, S: -6.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: August 27, 2015, 11:13:38 AM »

Republicans won't lose NH by 10 points, but they won't win it either.

Except during the LBJ landslide (the state was one of two that went to Landon in 1936!), Republicans haven't lost New Hampshire by 10%. They got close to doing so in 2008. 

I think you're thinking of Vermont. New Hampshire narrowly went FDR.
Logged
pbrower2a
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,854
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: August 27, 2015, 11:49:30 AM »

Republicans won't lose NH by 10 points, but they won't win it either.

Except during the LBJ landslide (the state was one of two that went to Landon in 1936!), Republicans haven't lost New Hampshire by 10%. They got close to doing so in 2008. 

I think you're thinking of Vermont. New Hampshire narrowly went FDR.

Correction noted.

"As goes Maine... so goes Vermont". FDR, 1936.


Except for 1964, the strongest win for any Democratic nominee in New Hampshire was by Obama in 2008.
 
Logged
eric82oslo
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,501
Norway


Political Matrix
E: -6.00, S: -5.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: August 27, 2015, 12:42:42 PM »

But I hope these polls hold up; I prefer it when New Hampshire votes Democratic.

That gives us hope that Ayotte will finally lose as well.
Logged
eric82oslo
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,501
Norway


Political Matrix
E: -6.00, S: -5.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: August 27, 2015, 12:51:12 PM »

The general public is still largely unaware of this scandal, but the more people get to know this, the lower her numbers will be.


After 6 months of constant news - being on the news practically every single day, and at the very least every single week - the vast majority of American voters still haven't heard one single word about the whole thing? That's what you're basically saying right? LMAO. If that's true, then it must be true that the vast majority of American voters have absolutely no clue who the hell this Trump guy is either. Wink
Logged
Rockefeller GOP
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,936
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #24 on: August 27, 2015, 01:20:37 PM »

B-b-b-b-b-b-but Free Bird and Larry Sabato told me New Hampshire is a super-duper-mega-ultra-turbo-elastic-libertarian-and-independent swing state! Cry

Lol, you're so annoying about this.  The GOP frontrunner is down 2% and Kasich is leading, so it's not a battleground?

What did NH do to you?
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.058 seconds with 12 queries.