Reuters primary polling: tracking thread.

[Ebsy]

Yeah, not buying this.

We'll see if it is just a blip. I think the post debate polls will show a better picture of the race.

[Ebsy]

The tracker showing Clinton at 41% was obviously an anomaly.

[Ebsy]

No one should take polls of "adults" seriously.

[Ebsy]

It will be amusing to come back to this thread after Iowa and see jfern's delusional ranting.

[Ebsy]

jfern being low energy.

[Ebsy]

Like all junkes, this forum needs a poll fix bad. Right now we are searching couch cushions for leftover morsels

my sources tell me we're getting a real humdinger of a SHOCK POLL tomorrow, so stay tuned

What exactly are these sources saying?

[Ebsy]

Reuters has been all over the place.

[Ebsy]

Thus confirming Reuters is even more of a joke.

[Ebsy]

Five day rolling average through Dec. 4:

http://polling.reuters.com/#poll/TR131/filters/PARTY_ID_:1/dates/20151130-20151204/type/day

Dems

Clinton 56%
Sanders 32%
O’Malley 4%

So much for Bernie's bump.

Reuters really seems to enjoy toying with the Sandernistas.

It's almost funny, if it weren't so sad. Every time Sanders is within 15%, they're all here, but then a few days later she's back to a 25%+ lead.

You have to click on day for the 5 day average. These are the correct results for Dec. 4.
Clinton 51.9
Sanders 35.5
O'Malley 4.1

Thus confirming Reuters is even more of a joke.

I'm not sure if it was a bug. But these seem to be the correct result. It might have been choosing some other time period before.

Anyways, this is the only post Thanksgiving weekend national poll we have so far.

http://polling.reuters.com/#!poll/TR131/type/smallest/filters/PARTY_ID_:1/dates/20150901-20151204/collapsed/false/spotlight/1

This is what I get. Regardless, the website is awfull since the redesign and combined with the fact that they're a pretty awfull pollster in general(C from fivethirtyeight and wild swings), it makes me wish I could just ignore them completely. However, you make a big deal about any slight movement in Bernies favor and then vanish when Hillary opens up a 28 point lead. Its hard to take your input in this thread seriously.

Well Hillary has a 16.4 point lead, not a 28 point lead.

Thanks for making his point.

[Ebsy]

Clinton leading by 35 points lol

[Ebsy]

No one takes this seriously other than jfern when it shows good numbers for Sanders.

[Ebsy]

There are no likely general election voters at this point.

[Ebsy]

I'm wondering if this polling bump for Sanders is just statistical noise. Some polls aren't showing it at all, while others with questionable records have been posting obvious outlier numbers.

[Ebsy]

I'm wondering if this polling bump for Sanders is just statistical noise. Some polls aren't showing it at all, while others with questionable records have been posting obvious outlier numbers.

What polls haven't shown it other than this one and Travis Marketing?

FOX. I guess we will have to see what DMR/Selzer has to say tomorrow.

[Ebsy]

Why are we not using the "Likely" voter filter for these results? It makes no sense to post polling numbers for people deemed to not be likely voters.

[Ebsy]

Clinton: 55
Sanders: 43

[Ebsy]

If the New Hampshire primary had only included Democrats, Sanders would have only won by 4%.

I don't think Reuters polled New Hampshire, so I am not sure how you can compare it.

[Ebsy]

Reuters won't help you in South Carolina.