Reuters primary polling: tracking thread.

[IceSpear]

These are the results among just D/Rs, which is why "wouldn't vote" is so high. When you filter it among likely D/R primary voters, Trump's lead is decreased significantly (and Clinton's increased significantly.)

Not that it matters since Reuters is a junk pollster, as evidenced by the fact that they are still polling candidates who have not only shown no interest in running, but have already endorsed a candidate. Now that we're getting much more polling, there's no need to scrape the bottom of the barrel anymore.

[IceSpear]

People actually take Reuters seriously? They constantly have wild swings for literally no reason, and included candidates who weren't running for like a year.

[IceSpear]

Even they’ve given up on including Gilmore in their polls.

Yet they included Cuomo and Gillibrand for like 6 months after they endorsed Hillary.

[IceSpear]

If the New Hampshire primary had only included Democrats, Sanders would have only won by 4%.

But Reuters doesn't narrow it down to "independents who plan to vote in the Democratic primary" or even "Democratic-leaning independents." It's just "independents." Which includes tons of right wingers who have no intention of voting in a Democratic primary. Typical from incompetent Reuters. That's probably why Pollster only uses the numbers among Democrats.

Also, there are a lot of closed primaries/caucuses.

[IceSpear]

It wouldn't surprise me if it was true, but Reuters is garbage.