Post random maps here (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 26, 2024, 12:43:42 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Election What-ifs? (Moderator: Dereich)
  Post random maps here (search mode)
Pages: 1 [2]
Author Topic: Post random maps here  (Read 990533 times)
Mechaman
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,791
Jamaica
« Reply #25 on: May 14, 2010, 02:15:57 PM »

I also used it to demonstrate quite easily how sensitive "liberals" and "progressives" are to any mention of how well FDR did with Southerners (admit, your response was so predictable).

Of course it was predictable. I said your comment was intellectually dishonest because I found it intellectually dishonest, and you eventually admitted that in great part it had nothing to do with your point. I just don't like this way of debating, using provocation in order to support your argumentation.


Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

And what did you expect him to do ? Campaigning throughout the South saying "you racist bastards, please don't vote for me !" ? Roosevelt was a "consensus builder" because at the time democrats were totally dependent to the South, and taking anti-segregation stances at the time would have been a political suicide. As soon as a new progressive democratic coalition was buil, the party started to evolve on the Civil Rights issue BTW, the GOP could have campaigned for civil rights far before, and without any political risk. If there is a party which should be blamed for how late racial equality has been enforced in the US, it's definitely the GOP. And anyways, Roosevelt was as much as a liberal as a democrat could be at the time, and on a long term he made his party strong enough to be able to afford the loss of the South, and thus to abolish Segregation. Of course this is a personal opinion, but I think we could thank him a bit for what happened 30 years later.


Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Well yes, but anyways I don't think segregation was a very important issue. The South considered it as granted since the beginning of the Century, and the North wasn't really willing to change this anymore.

My point is this is a "Post a Random Map" thread and I described what my random map was about, put a random factoid up (granted using the words "baby's daddy" was an easy provocation) and it has now evolved into a total bitchfest.
Logged
Mechaman
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,791
Jamaica
« Reply #26 on: May 14, 2010, 02:33:27 PM »

Bitchfest ? Huh It seemed to me that we were discussing.

Sorry it seems like at various times in your posts you seemed to sound like I offended you in some manner.
And also, reason why I bring up FDR so many times is that because to me liberal worship of FDR reminds me a lot of conservative worship of Reagan: misguided and tons of excuses made for both as to why they exemplify their ideologies when also being anything but in some cases.  I am just as annoyed by FDR being called "liberal" while he remained quiet on Civil Rights for his first 8 years just as much as I am annoyed by Reagan being called "conservative" while supporting massive deficit spending.
And (what do you know) Reagan seemed to do really well in the so-called "libertarian west".
Logged
Mechaman
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,791
Jamaica
« Reply #27 on: May 16, 2010, 02:02:33 PM »

Bitchfest ? Huh It seemed to me that we were discussing.

Sorry it seems like at various times in your posts you seemed to sound like I offended you in some manner.

Arguing against you is the same as bitching now ? I don't think I was using a particularly aggressive tone, I simply expressed a disagreement with what you said.
And while, as I said, I felt pretty annoyed by the way you started this debate, I always find worthwhile to discuss with you. Wink So if you are interested in answering to my few points, feel free to do.

Sorry man, I had very little sleep that day and couldn't think coherently.
I'm being serious.

But still it's interesting how some of the data matches up that I've collected, like William Bryan, populist extraordinaire, being the best candidate in the American West.
Logged
Mechaman
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,791
Jamaica
« Reply #28 on: July 11, 2010, 02:36:19 PM »


Hillary Clinton vs. Sarah Palin in 2012 in a Hillary wins in 2008 universe?

Pretty much.

Winning NE-03???

You do realize that's arguably the most Republican district in the nation, right?

Yeah, NE-03 is like western Kansas (to give you an idea of just how scary it is) only colder.
Logged
Mechaman
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,791
Jamaica
« Reply #29 on: October 25, 2010, 07:51:53 PM »

 


Anyone care to take a gander?

Logged
Mechaman
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,791
Jamaica
« Reply #30 on: October 25, 2010, 08:03:09 PM »


Something to do with either JFK or Bill Clinton most likely. Is it "Buchanan in 1996", or something?

Very good, but that's not it.

I'll give you a hint: you're two thirds right.
Logged
Mechaman
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,791
Jamaica
« Reply #31 on: October 25, 2010, 09:49:55 PM »
« Edited: October 25, 2010, 09:51:30 PM by Somebody's Watching Me »


Something to do with either JFK or Bill Clinton most likely. Is it "Buchanan in 1996", or something?

Very good, but that's not it.

I'll give you a hint: you're two thirds right.

OK, that means I have two options left: Perot in '96, or Buchanan in '92. Perot would seem credible if not for the fact that he carries Mississippi, however, I can't see Buchanan making it a tight race in states like Califonia and Maine. However, it has to be one of those two, right?
No.
Here's another hint: notice anything weird about the map?
That should help you.

It is pretty damn hard, so if you do find out what it is I'll be REALLY impressed.
Logged
Mechaman
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,791
Jamaica
« Reply #32 on: October 26, 2010, 07:07:49 PM »


Well I have a 24 hour on this, so here goes:

This is a map that gauges the voting behavior of states in the 1928, 1960, and 1992 elections.    If you'll notice there is no Alaska, Hawaii, or DC since none of those places were on the electoral map at the time.  This is pretty much like TrueCon's earlier map, except different candidates and lighter colors (for a happier map!)  A bit random, but pretty interesting since it oddly resembles an alternate 1960 or 1968 electoral map (except the vote percentages, lol). Here is what the colors stand for:

Dark Red: Straight Democratic: Smith/Kennedy/Clinton
Light Red: Mostly Democratic: Hoover/Kennedy/Clinton, Smith/Nixon/Clinton, or Smith/Kennedy/Bush
Green: Smith/Unpledged/Bush
Light Blue: Mostly Republican: Smith/Nixon/Bush, Hoover/Kennedy/Bush, or Hoover/Nixon/Clinton
Dark Blue: Straight Republican: Hoover/Nixon/Bush
Logged
Mechaman
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,791
Jamaica
« Reply #33 on: February 05, 2011, 08:07:45 PM »



Anybody care to take a gander?
Logged
Mechaman
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,791
Jamaica
« Reply #34 on: February 05, 2011, 08:53:53 PM »
« Edited: February 05, 2011, 08:59:37 PM by The REAL original Moderate Hero »


Okay here it is,

Post-Apocalyptic Murica

Pink: The Northern Confederation of States
Light Red: The Union of American Steelmakers
Red: The Eternal Hawaii Empire
Brick Red: The People's Democratic Republic of New York
Maroon: The Socialist Democratic Confederation of Southern New England
Period Red: Mos Eisley
Sky Blue: Cocainia
Blue: Republic of Suburbia
Darkest Blue: The Liberal Democracy of Greater Suburbia (+3 people)
Turquoise: The Republic of Cool People
Light Green: The Pacific Republic of Cool and Happening Dudes and Dudettes
Green: The Neo-Alaskan Republic of People Who Shoot Polar Bears
Dark Green: Satan's Vacation Home
Tan (or is it beige?): United Mormon Republic of Freewheeling Hippies and Johns
Yella: The Republic of New Texaco
Puke yellow (or is it gold?): Motherfuckerstan
Sh*tty looking orange: The United Eternal Kingdom of Our Lord Jebus
Brown: The Empire of Butts
White: Republic of Arizona for White People Only
Blank: Apocalyptic Wasteland
Logged
Mechaman
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,791
Jamaica
« Reply #35 on: February 09, 2011, 08:54:59 AM »



If you guessed a Palin/Bachmann ticket vs. Obama/Clinton, you'd be right.

I'm sorry but there is no chance in hell that Oklahoma votes over 60% Democratic if Obama is on the ticket.  Hell, Texas would have more a chance of flipping (and going 60% for Obama).
Seriously, I know these people.
Logged
Mechaman
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,791
Jamaica
« Reply #36 on: November 05, 2011, 11:56:58 PM »

Guess

Logged
Mechaman
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,791
Jamaica
« Reply #37 on: November 06, 2011, 09:40:55 AM »

Here's another.

Logged
Mechaman
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,791
Jamaica
« Reply #38 on: July 31, 2012, 06:25:15 PM »

Logged
Mechaman
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,791
Jamaica
« Reply #39 on: August 02, 2012, 11:34:58 AM »


Any guesses?
Logged
Mechaman
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,791
Jamaica
« Reply #40 on: August 02, 2012, 05:00:01 PM »

Both correct gentlemen.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.052 seconds with 10 queries.