McCaskill Seriously Considering Challenging Talent
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 29, 2024, 07:52:22 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  McCaskill Seriously Considering Challenging Talent
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: McCaskill Seriously Considering Challenging Talent  (Read 1273 times)
Moooooo
nickshepDEM
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,909


Political Matrix
E: -0.52, S: 3.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: May 05, 2005, 12:14:57 PM »

From The Hill:

Missouri state Auditor Claire McCaskill (D) is expected to meet with officials from the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee (DSCC) early next week to discuss a possible 2006 bid against Sen. Jim Talent (R-Mo.).

McCaskill ran unsuccessfully for governor last year and is one of three Democrats to hold statewide office in Missouri. There has been considerable speculation in her home state about a Senate run.

State Sen. Chuck Graham (D) has already announced that he will be challenging Talent, but McCaskill has better name I.D. and is considered to be a stronger contender. A recent DSCC poll shows McCaskill tied with Talent, with 43% each.
Logged
TheresNoMoney
Scoonie
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,907


Political Matrix
E: -3.25, S: -2.72

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: May 05, 2005, 12:38:24 PM »

We need you to run Claire! Winning a seat in MO would be huge for us.
Logged
Moooooo
nickshepDEM
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,909


Political Matrix
E: -0.52, S: 3.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: May 05, 2005, 12:44:10 PM »

We need you to run Claire! Winning a seat in MO would be huge for us.

It will be an uphill race for her.  I think Talent is stronger than his numbers show.  Plus, he's been raising a ton of cash latley.  He will be well funded and prepared.
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: May 05, 2005, 12:49:42 PM »

That state is very polarized. Sorta like...
Jesus (R) 59%
Convicted Serial Killer (D) 41%

Jesus (D) 55%
Convicted Serial Killer (R) 45%

Very hard to win that one...no matter that Talent won't likely break 55% against just about anyone.
Logged
opebo
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 47,009


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: May 05, 2005, 01:43:09 PM »

We need you to run Claire! Winning a seat in MO would be huge for us.

It will be an uphill race for her.  I think Talent is stronger than his numbers show.  Plus, he's been raising a ton of cash latley.  He will be well funded and prepared.

He is well funded, of course.  But he is not particularly well liked.  Aside from the peculiar nature and extreme closeness of his first election, he is from St. Louis County.  Normally 'outstaters' do not like candidates from St. Louis.  McGaskill would not have to wittle down his rural/small town vote much at all to win, as of course she can count on the urban vote.  Still, I agree it will be difficult.  A lot depends on the economy, which is mediocre to good in suburban Missouri, but very bad everywhere else.
Logged
ian
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,461


Political Matrix
E: -0.52, S: -1.39

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: May 05, 2005, 05:35:29 PM »

We need you to run Claire! Winning a seat in MO would be huge for us.

I would totally poop my pants if she ran and won!
Logged
King
intermoderate
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,356
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: May 06, 2005, 06:37:10 PM »

Sad as it is, McCaskill might get 46%ish AT BEST. Noone else will unless Talant is found in bed with Micheal Jackson.
Talant wining with 49-55% is still Talant winning.

Not if he gets 49% with no 3rd party running! Wink
Logged
opebo
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 47,009


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: May 06, 2005, 06:58:09 PM »

Sad as it is, McCaskill might get 46%ish AT BEST. Noone else will unless Talant is found in bed with Micheal Jackson.
Talant wining with 49-55% is still Talant winning.

55% for Talent is very unlikely - I believe Kit Bond only cracked that percentage for the first time in 2004, with the Bush coat-tails.  Bond is much more popular than Talent.

But yeah, a 51 or 52% win for Talent is more likely than the other way round.
Logged
King
intermoderate
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,356
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: May 06, 2005, 11:36:46 PM »

Sad as it is, McCaskill might get 46%ish AT BEST. Noone else will unless Talant is found in bed with Micheal Jackson.
Talant wining with 49-55% is still Talant winning.

55% for Talent is very unlikely - I believe Kit Bond only cracked that percentage for the first time in 2004, with the Bush coat-tails.  Bond is much more popular than Talent.

But yeah, a 51 or 52% win for Talent is more likely than the other way round.

I was just looking at the 1994 Senate results and I find it amazing that Sen. "I lost to a dead guy" Ashcroft won with 62% of the vote!
Logged
socaldem
skolodji
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,040


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: May 08, 2005, 02:30:33 AM »

I think McCaskill would do well...

Missouri certainly has swung republican recently, but I think their legislature has engaged in the same sort of overreach repubs have done nationwide....

McCaskill can run not only against national Republicans but against the foibles of the statewide nutters...in addition to social security, the dems can viciously attack on the medicare cuts recently enacted... since Talent is from St Louis County, Claire could hit him hard on populist economic issues in more rural counties, while working the suburbs on issues like stem cell research.  Claire's a tough cookie and I think 04 was just a particularly bad year for state dems and, even then, she got like 48% of the vote.  In what I presume will be a much better political climate in 06 and with Talent's regional weakness properly exploited, I think it would be a toss-up if not a lean-dem race...
Logged
Chancellor Tanterterg
Mr. X
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,349
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: December 27, 2006, 11:03:50 AM »

Sad as it is, McCaskill might get 46%ish AT BEST. No one else will unless Talant is found in bed with Micheal Jackson.
Talant wining with 49-55% is still Talant winning.

This one of the times where I am glad I was wrong Smiley
Logged
True Democrat
true democrat
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,368
United States


Political Matrix
E: 1.10, S: -2.87

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: December 27, 2006, 04:02:11 PM »

We need you to run Claire! Winning a seat in MO would be huge for us.

I would totally poop my pants if she ran and won!

How are your pants?
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.043 seconds with 12 queries.