1988: Why did Dukukis pick Lloyd Bensten? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 07:03:44 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  1988: Why did Dukukis pick Lloyd Bensten? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: 1988: Why did Dukukis pick Lloyd Bensten?  (Read 2938 times)
Hydera
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,545


« on: May 29, 2015, 09:51:53 PM »

Dukakis had this strange idea that he was JFK's Second Coming-a Massachusetts politician with a Texan running-mate launching a Democratic renaissance after eight years of Republican plague. Since Carter had crashed so spectacularly, and an 1964-style victory impossible, Kennedy seemed the model to follow. Democrats only wrote off the South after 2000, and early on Dukakis was actually competitive in border states.

When I look at the 1988 map, it's so bizarre to see WV Democratic but not Vermont, CT, MD, and DE.



West Virginia had an economic slump from 1979 that didn't end until 1994. Lots of Socially conservative democrats that went for Reagan in 1984 because Mondale was seen as too liberal. Dukakis choosing Bensten instead of a liberal northerner like mondale did with ferraro might of convinced them to come back along with people voting for dukakis out of protest over the economic slump in the state.

Also democrats were not as environmentalist as they were back in 1988. Environmentalism was largely just "make factories adopt stuff to stop pollution" not post-2000. When it became "shut down coal plants to reduce CO2". The heart of West Virginia industry is coal and democrats might of still won West Virginia post-1996 by never adopting carbon reduction policies but at the same time pissing off the environmentalist base.
Logged
Hydera
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,545


« Reply #1 on: June 01, 2015, 04:14:20 PM »

I wish Dukakis had won. No Clinton and maybe (though not likely) no Bush.

Dukakis would have been one term. He likely would have dithered when Iraq invaded Kuwait. The higher oil prices combined with the 1991 recession would have doomed the Dem party in 92. Not sure who the GOP nominee would have been. Dole or Kemp most likely.

Somewhat similar scenario to 1928-- prior to the Great Depression, in which a Democratic loss was a blessing in disguise for the party.

Agree that Dukakis would have dithered on Saddam.  Bush and (James) Baker did a great job on getting diplomacy to work and get world opinion on our side.  Too bad there doesn't seem to be any of that in the Republican Party today.



Along with 2004. I know the people who still wished that Kerry was elected are those who were really hardcore into leaving iraq ASAP.

But Kerry would of faced a major loss in 2008 as well with possibly a historic GOP majority in the House and senate. If kerry was president during the financial crisis.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.022 seconds with 12 queries.