2000 Without Nader? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 29, 2024, 02:34:12 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Election What-ifs?
  Past Election What-ifs (US) (Moderator: Dereich)
  2000 Without Nader? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: 2000 Without Nader?  (Read 2993 times)
SUSAN CRUSHBONE
a Person
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,735
Antarctica


WWW
« on: May 10, 2015, 06:17:55 PM »
new hampshire and florida are the only two states that flip
Logged
SUSAN CRUSHBONE
a Person
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,735
Antarctica


WWW
« Reply #1 on: May 10, 2015, 06:36:22 PM »
nh was 48.1/46.8/3.9. if gore gets at least 2/3 of the nader vote, he wins.
Logged
SUSAN CRUSHBONE
a Person
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,735
Antarctica


WWW
« Reply #2 on: May 12, 2015, 02:29:27 AM »
Quote from: Lief 🐋 on May 11, 2015, 08:52:45 PM
Normally I agree with TNF that it's stupid to blame third parties, but come on, he lost by literally 500 votes. At least 500 Nader votes would have switched to Gore.

but if gore had gotten, say, 1000 more votes, jeb, harris, &co would have just increased their contribution by as much.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.027 seconds with 13 queries.