2000 Without Nader? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 30, 2024, 01:24:29 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Election What-ifs?
  Past Election What-ifs (US) (Moderator: Dereich)
  2000 Without Nader? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: 2000 Without Nader?  (Read 3018 times)
WVdemocrat
DimpledChad
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 954
United States


« on: May 13, 2015, 11:21:41 PM »

Gore was a terrible candidate.

If he would have won his home state of Tennessee he would not have had to worry about Florida.



It was because of Gore that 2000 was even close. You have to remember that he trailed Bush throughout most of the campaign. It wasn't until the fall campaign when he really began to turn things around. Okay, Gore was stupid to not campaign with Clinton, but other than that, he ran a really good campaign.

Anyway, Gore would surely have won without Nader in the race. At least a few hundred would-be Nader voters would still vote, and would vote for Gore, in Florida.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.023 seconds with 13 queries.