California 100 years from now (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 29, 2024, 07:38:25 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Presidential Election Trends (Moderator: 100% pro-life no matter what)
  California 100 years from now (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: California 100 years from now  (Read 8325 times)
Rockefeller GOP
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,936
United States


« on: April 28, 2015, 08:49:14 PM »

The state parties will adjust depending on the circumstances, but California may never vote Republican for President for many, many decades.

Probably true.  But if VT and MS can vote for the same party at different times in the 20th Century - even sometimes during the same election - I won't rule anything out.
Logged
Rockefeller GOP
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,936
United States


« Reply #1 on: May 01, 2015, 01:59:32 PM »

There are far fewer "rich" liberals in the US than this forum likes to believe, and there are without a doubt more rich conservatives.  This idea that the Democratic Party is 50% minorities and 50% rich PhD cosmopolitans who play hero and look out for said minorities' interests is ... well, it's funny.
Logged
Rockefeller GOP
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,936
United States


« Reply #2 on: May 01, 2015, 05:50:41 PM »

There are far fewer "rich" liberals in the US than this forum likes to believe, and there are without a doubt more rich conservatives.  This idea that the Democratic Party is 50% minorities and 50% rich PhD cosmopolitans who play hero and look out for said minorities' interests is ... well, it's funny.

CA is a state run for and by the wealthy liberal elites.

Yet its most affluent county (Orange) is a GOP stronghold.  There's not a blue state in the Union that Democrats have these mythical "liberal elites" to thank for their margins of victory.
Logged
Rockefeller GOP
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,936
United States


« Reply #3 on: May 12, 2015, 07:54:46 PM »

By 2114, CA will be 90% Spanish, and likely in some type of confederation with Mexico

Spoken like a true nativist. I don't know if this ever came across to you, but people want to leave Mexico because they want to come here. Not because they want to feel entitled by welfare or something and join back with their ancestors. Over half of those who speak Spanish as their primary language also speak English fluently according to the census. The same people who think like you would've been the same people who said Catholics and eastern Europeans wouldn't integrate into America and wouldn't feel proud of their country in the 1920's.

Very true.  Bobloblaw seems like a Dixiecrat of days passed - looking down on the rich, anti-immigration, suspicious of "elites" yet has little substantive to say.

Exactly why he has no place in the Republican Party.  He sounds like an intolerant fool every time he speaks.
Logged
Rockefeller GOP
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,936
United States


« Reply #4 on: May 13, 2015, 02:03:39 PM »

By 2114, CA will be 90% Spanish, and likely in some type of confederation with Mexico

Spoken like a true nativist. I don't know if this ever came across to you, but people want to leave Mexico because they want to come here. Not because they want to feel entitled by welfare or something and join back with their ancestors. Over half of those who speak Spanish as their primary language also speak English fluently according to the census. The same people who think like you would've been the same people who said Catholics and eastern Europeans wouldn't integrate into America and wouldn't feel proud of their country in the 1920's.

Very true.  Bobloblaw seems like a Dixiecrat of days passed - looking down on the rich, anti-immigration, suspicious of "elites" yet has little substantive to say.

Exactly why he has no place in the Republican Party.  He sounds like an intolerant fool every time he speaks.

youre irrelevant in the GOP even in ME. You dont even have pull in your own state. Paul Lepage is not Rockefeller wimp. 

I'd like to hear you agree with or refute the claim that your views are more or less that of a Dixiecrat.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.023 seconds with 12 queries.