PA-Quinnipiac: Toomey way ahead (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 26, 2024, 09:48:15 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 Senatorial Election Polls
  PA-Quinnipiac: Toomey way ahead (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: PA-Quinnipiac: Toomey way ahead  (Read 6227 times)
King
intermoderate
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,356
United States


« on: April 06, 2015, 09:12:12 AM »

Toomey's a decent Senator. I think he'll hang on, but he'll have to distance himself from the Presidential campaign so crossover voters will stay on board.
Logged
King
intermoderate
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,356
United States


« Reply #1 on: April 06, 2015, 09:47:44 AM »

Early polls rarely paint an accurate picture of the race, especially in wave years, either way. If we look at 2014, right now you would have thought Peters was going to lose in Michigan and Pryor was going to win in Arkansas.

Hagan and Begich were also +20 approval rating this time in 2013.
Logged
King
intermoderate
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,356
United States


« Reply #2 on: April 06, 2015, 10:56:31 AM »

Early polls rarely paint an accurate picture of the race, especially in wave years, either way. If we look at 2014, right now you would have thought Peters was going to lose in Michigan and Pryor was going to win in Arkansas.

Hagan and Begich were also +20 approval rating this time in 2013.

Carter, Dukakis and Bush II were also ahead by 15-20 points one year before their election as I'm sure you know Wink If Toomey is not inevitable (which he isn't), Hillary will be neither Smiley

Taking things in a vacuum and looking for a pattern is asking to be wrong. I bet you were part of the crowd that thought Romney was going to win because the Redskins lost the Sunday before election day.

Carter and Bush II had national tragedy rallies on their numbers. 1987 had a stock market crash and recession that hurt Bush I. They weren't genuinely what their numbers were at this point.

We are in a low point for Hillary Clinton, where she is getting attacked by the media religiously.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.021 seconds with 13 queries.