IA-Quinnipiac: Clinton 61% Warren 19% Biden 7% Sanders 5% Webb 2% O'Malley 0%
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 29, 2024, 11:15:47 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
  IA-Quinnipiac: Clinton 61% Warren 19% Biden 7% Sanders 5% Webb 2% O'Malley 0%
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: IA-Quinnipiac: Clinton 61% Warren 19% Biden 7% Sanders 5% Webb 2% O'Malley 0%  (Read 583 times)
Mr. Morden
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,066
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: February 26, 2015, 08:53:33 AM »

Quinnipiac Iowa caucus poll:

http://www.quinnipiac.edu/news-and-events/quinnipiac-university-poll/iowa/release-detail?ReleaseID=2168

Clinton 61%
Warren 19%
Biden 7%
Sanders 5%
Webb 2%
O'Malley 0%
Logged
Mr. Morden
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,066
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: February 26, 2015, 09:02:40 AM »

If Clinton doesn't run:

Warren 36%
Biden 32%
Sanders 8%
Webb 4%
O'Malley 2%

Are there any candidates you would definitely NOT support for the Democratic nomination?

Biden 12%
Clinton 6%
O'Malley 5%
Webb 4%
Sanders 3%
Warren 3%
no one 60%
don't know 18%

fav / unfav %:

Clinton 90/7% for +83%
Biden 77/15% for +62%
Warren 60/5% for +55%
Sanders 39/3% for +36%
Webb 16/4% for +12%
O'Malley 12/3% for +9%

Most important issue for you in deciding who to support for Dem. nomination for president:

economy 18%
foreign policy 6%
class inequality 5%
health care 5%
jobs/unemployment 4%
income inequality 4%
education 4%
social issues 4%
environment 4%
electability 3%
Logged
King
intermoderate
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,356
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: February 26, 2015, 12:05:25 PM »

She-Who-Is-Not-Running has some pretty high name recognition in this poll. Webb and O'Malley do as well. I'm not sure I buy it, though Iowa Democrats probably are more engaged in politics than average Democrats.
Logged
Attorney General, Senator-Elect, & Former PPT Dwarven Dragon
Dwarven Dragon
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,720
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.42, S: -0.52

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: February 26, 2015, 12:22:10 PM »

#Warrenat20%
#2008Redux
Logged
Landslide Lyndon
px75
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,863
Greece


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: February 26, 2015, 12:32:04 PM »

So I guess that in a Warren-less poll Clinton will hit 70%. Not bad.
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: February 26, 2015, 03:14:01 PM »

More like 0'Malley, am I right?
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: February 26, 2015, 03:15:35 PM »

If Clinton doesn't run:

Warren 36%
Biden 32%
Sanders 8%
Webb 4%
O'Malley 2%

Even though Warren clearly doesn't want to run, you have to wonder if numbers like this would lure her in if Hillary wasn't a factor.
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: February 26, 2015, 06:09:56 PM »

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

So not only does "muh dynasties" make no difference for Hillary in the general election, it's actually a positive in the primary. So much for that narrative.
Logged
King
intermoderate
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,356
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: February 26, 2015, 06:50:40 PM »

The dynasty stuff is just a ploy to lump the Clintons and Bushes together. I fully expect the non-Jeb nominee on the GOP side say "we don't need more Bushes and we don't need more Clintons" as if they were comparable presidencies.
Logged
morgieb
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,631
Australia


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -8.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: February 26, 2015, 08:33:58 PM »

Ouch Biden.

Hillary would be 70%+ most likely if you took out Warren.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.032 seconds with 12 queries.