WI: PPP for National Journal: Walker +1
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 15, 2024, 02:05:10 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2014 Gubernatorial Election Polls
  WI: PPP for National Journal: Walker +1
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: WI: PPP for National Journal: Walker +1  (Read 1635 times)
Miles
MilesC56
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,324
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: October 21, 2014, 10:05:38 AM »

Report.

Walker (R)- 47%
Burke (D)- 46%
Logged
Maxwell
mah519
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,459
Germany


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: October 21, 2014, 10:14:56 AM »

That is a fascinating headline - PPP for the freaking national journal.

Continues the trend that this race is up in the air with the narrowest of narrow tilts for Walker. We'll see on election day though.
Logged
Lief 🗽
Lief
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,915


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: October 21, 2014, 10:19:34 AM »

Democrats usually do slightly better on election day than they do in the polls (even if they end up losing anyway). Though this might just be a result of same day registration, which I think Walker and co. got rid of?
Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,177
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: October 21, 2014, 10:27:51 AM »

Democrats usually do slightly better on election day than they do in the polls (even if they end up losing anyway). Though this might just be a result of same day registration, which I think Walker and co. got rid of?

Nope, same day registration is still possible in WI.

But not in NC.

I think WI only shortened early voting and put voting with picture ID's in place (which was then axed by the Supreme Court).
Logged
they don't love you like i love you
BRTD
Atlas Prophet
*****
Posts: 112,904
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -6.50, S: -6.67

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: October 21, 2014, 10:37:49 AM »

47% sure isn't a good place to be for an incumbent governor as controversial as Walker this late.

And yes, I understand that Wisconsin after a judge's decision now again has some of the most permissive voting laws in the country.
Logged
Lief 🗽
Lief
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,915


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: October 21, 2014, 10:38:36 AM »

Democrats usually do slightly better on election day than they do in the polls (even if they end up losing anyway). Though this might just be a result of same day registration, which I think Walker and co. got rid of?

Nope, same day registration is still possible in WI.

But not in NC.

I think WI only shortened early voting and put voting with picture ID's in place (which was then axed by the Supreme Court).

Ah, that's good to know! Walker is in pretty deep trouble with numbers like this then.
Logged
they don't love you like i love you
BRTD
Atlas Prophet
*****
Posts: 112,904
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -6.50, S: -6.67

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: October 21, 2014, 10:39:47 AM »

This election has been so uninteresting in Minnesota it was going to be the first time in a long time I didn't even bother taking Election Day off or doing any canvassing the weekend before, but come to think of it I could do some good in Madison...but then I'd have to take off Monday too probably. Eh we'll see.

But then again, I don't necessarily have to go all the way to Madison. I could always go to River Falls or Menominee (college towns near the border)
Logged
Devils30
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,980
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.06, S: -4.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: October 21, 2014, 10:53:02 AM »

Considering the younger voters are the undecideds this one could get interesting
Logged
Chance92
Rookie
**
Posts: 102


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: October 21, 2014, 10:58:26 AM »

I have hesitantly high hopes for Burke.
Logged
Never
Never Convinced
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,623
Political Matrix
E: 4.65, S: 3.30

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: October 21, 2014, 11:26:00 AM »

Democrats usually do slightly better on election day than they do in the polls (even if they end up losing anyway).

Walker did overperform some polls in the 2012 recall (PPP's final poll of the 2012 recall had Walker up 3, and he ultimately won by 7), so Democrats overperforming their poll numbers might not apply to this race. On the other hand, Walker underperformed in 2010 compared to the polls. My point is that the picture isn't very clear regarding which side will overperform their poll numbers on November 4.
Logged
Maxwell
mah519
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,459
Germany


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: October 21, 2014, 11:29:08 AM »

Democrats usually do slightly better on election day than they do in the polls (even if they end up losing anyway).

Walker did overperform some polls in the 2012 recall (PPP's final poll of the 2012 recall had Walker up 3, and he ultimately won by 7), so Democrats overperforming their poll numbers might not apply to this race. On the other hand, Walker underperformed in 2010 compared to the polls. My point is that the picture isn't very clear regarding which side will overperform their poll numbers on November 4.

PPP has an iffy track record in Wisconsin. They were actually the most pro-Ron Johnson poll in 2010.
Logged
Never
Never Convinced
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,623
Political Matrix
E: 4.65, S: 3.30

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: October 21, 2014, 11:38:03 AM »

Democrats usually do slightly better on election day than they do in the polls (even if they end up losing anyway).

Walker did overperform some polls in the 2012 recall (PPP's final poll of the 2012 recall had Walker up 3, and he ultimately won by 7), so Democrats overperforming their poll numbers might not apply to this race. On the other hand, Walker underperformed in 2010 compared to the polls. My point is that the picture isn't very clear regarding which side will overperform their poll numbers on November 4.

PPP has an iffy track record in Wisconsin. They were actually the most pro-Ron Johnson poll in 2010.

Interesting. I suppose they could be understating Walker's advantage this go-around, but considering PPP is showing numbers similar to other polls in the race, I'm not sure if their track record will continue to be poor this year...
Logged
Lief 🗽
Lief
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,915


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: October 21, 2014, 11:44:42 AM »

Past Wisconsin results:

2012 President:
RCP Avg: D +4.2
Final Result: D +6.9

2012 Senate:
RCP Avg: D +2.2
Final Result: D +5.5

2010 Governor:
RCP Avg: R +8.7
Final result: R +5.7

2010 Senate:
RCP Avg: R +7.7
Final result: R +4.9

2008 President:
RCP Avg: D +11.0
Final Result: D +13.9

IIRC, polls in 2004 and 2000 also had Bush winning Wisconsin, so this has existed for a while.

To be fair, the polling average nailed almost exactly the run-off result, but I think for obvious reasons it's okay to put an asterisk next to that.
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,450
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: October 22, 2014, 08:14:04 AM »

God damn, this one is going to be fun to follow on election night.
Logged
Rockefeller GOP
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,936
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: October 22, 2014, 10:59:36 AM »

I think Walker eeks this one out.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.044 seconds with 13 queries.