ME-Ipsos/Bangor Daily News: Collins up by a lot

[Tender Branson]

56-31-4 Collins/Bellows/Bennett

http://bangordailynews.com/2014/10/14/politics/bdnipsos-poll-shows-michaud-collins-with-leads-most-voters-leaning-no-on-question-1

[Attorney General, Senator-Elect, & Former PPT Dwarven Dragon]

All Hail Collins!

[Lambsbread]

inb4 KCDem: "junk!"

[eric82oslo]

Only 56% for Collins? That's the lowest I've seen to date I think. Yet her margin is larger than in the last Maine poll (where she was 22% ahead). I think most of the undecided are Democratic-leaning though, anything else would be a shock.

[Antonio the Sixth]

Only 56% for Collins? That's the lowest I've seen to date I think. Yet her margin is larger than in the last Maine poll (where she was 22% ahead). I think most of the undecided are Democratic-leaning though, anything else would be a shock.

#collinsunder60
#bellowsmentum

[Attorney General, Senator-Elect, & Former PPT Dwarven Dragon]

Only 56% for Collins? That's the lowest I've seen to date I think. Yet her margin is larger than in the last Maine poll (where she was 22% ahead). I think most of the undecided are Democratic-leaning though, anything else would be a shock.

You may want to take a second look at your election predictions. Branstad is not hitting 80%, nor is Kasich or Coakley hitting 70%, Wolf and Cuomo aren't going to reach 90%, nor is Davis going to reach 60%, etc. etc. Keep in mind that the %'s are meant to reflect the actual vote share of the winning candidate, not their chance of victory.

[eric82oslo]

Only 56% for Collins? That's the lowest I've seen to date I think. Yet her margin is larger than in the last Maine poll (where she was 22% ahead). I think most of the undecided are Democratic-leaning though, anything else would be a shock.

You may want to take a second look at your election predictions. Branstad is not hitting 80%, nor is Kasich or Coakley hitting 70%, Wolf and Cuomo aren't going to reach 90%, nor is Davis going to reach 60%, etc. etc. Keep in mind that the %'s are meant to reflect the actual vote share of the winning candidate, not their chance of victory.

What the f are you talking about? I haven't even made a comment about any of the races you mention above. Keep it civil dude. Attacking just for the sake of attacking isn't a honorable sport.

Again, I have never said that Bellows will win, so you can just chill out.

[Recalcuate]

Only 56% for Collins? That's the lowest I've seen to date I think. Yet her margin is larger than in the last Maine poll (where she was 22% ahead). I think most of the undecided are Democratic-leaning though, anything else would be a shock.

A safe seat is a safe seat. Doesn't really matter if Collins wins by 10 or 20, just like Booker in New Jersey, Durbin in Illinois or Merkley in Oregon. 56% is still impressive in a three-way race.

[Attorney General, Senator-Elect, & Former PPT Dwarven Dragon]

Only 56% for Collins? That's the lowest I've seen to date I think. Yet her margin is larger than in the last Maine poll (where she was 22% ahead). I think most of the undecided are Democratic-leaning though, anything else would be a shock.

You may want to take a second look at your election predictions. Branstad is not hitting 80%, nor is Kasich or Coakley hitting 70%, Wolf and Cuomo aren't going to reach 90%, nor is Davis going to reach 60%, etc. etc. Keep in mind that the %'s are meant to reflect the actual vote share of the winning candidate, not their chance of victory.

What the f are you talking about? I haven't even made a comment about any of the races you mention above. Keep it civil dude. Attacking just for the sake of attacking isn't a honorable sport.

Again, I have never said that Bellows will win, so you can just chill out.

I'm talking about your prediction maps (linked to below your avatar).

[SWE]

Gross.