|           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
September 18, 2020, 12:40:28 pm
News:
If you are having trouble logging in due to invalid user name / pass:

Consider resetting your account password, as you may have forgotten it over time if using a password manager.

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2014 Gubernatorial Election Polls
  2014 Senatorial Election Polls
  VA-Roanoke College: Warner+18
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: VA-Roanoke College: Warner+18  (Read 1347 times)
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 54,879
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: September 24, 2014, 11:00:25 am »

444 likely voters, incl. leaners:

51% Warner
33% Gillespie
  6% Sarvis
10% Undecided

http://roanoke.edu/A-Z_Index/Institute_for_Policy_and_Opinion_Research/Recent_News_Releases/RC_Poll_Election_Sept_2014.htm
Logged
Miles
MilesC56
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,336
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: September 24, 2014, 11:05:51 am »

Warner still under 50% without leaners.

#Gillespiementun
Logged
Nat. Sec. Council Member Dwarven Dragon
Dwarven Dragon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,015
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.55, S: 0.87

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: September 24, 2014, 11:14:34 am »

Politico: Warner's still very vulnerable!

-----------

Warner's only polling at 51%, which suggests a stronger challenger may have had a real shot (Bill Bolling, or maybe McDonnell/Obenshain/Forbes) . But Gillespie isn't the right one, and Warner may even lead at the beginning of the count despite VA's republican counting bias. (In order to be leading at the beginning of the count as a democrat in Virginia, you need to win the election by ~16 points+, and Warner appears to be reaching and exceeding that threshold)
Logged
ElectionAtlas
Atlas Proginator
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,503
United States


P P P
WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: September 24, 2014, 02:50:06 pm »

New Poll: Virginia Senator by Roanoke College on 2014-09-19

Summary: D: 46%, R: 27%, I: 5%, U: 23%

Poll Source URL: Full Poll Details
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,955
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: September 24, 2014, 03:22:44 pm »

Politico: Warner's still very vulnerable!

-----------

Warner's only polling at 51%, which suggests a stronger challenger may have had a real shot (Bill Bolling, or maybe McDonnell/Obenshain/Forbes) . But Gillespie isn't the right one, and Warner may even lead at the beginning of the count despite VA's republican counting bias. (In order to be leading at the beginning of the count as a democrat in Virginia, you need to win the election by ~16 points+, and Warner appears to be reaching and exceeding that threshold)

Been following the news about him lately? Tongue

Anyway, Ed Gillespie is clearly on track to give Warnercare a good thrashing.
Logged
Nat. Sec. Council Member Dwarven Dragon
Dwarven Dragon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,015
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.55, S: 0.87

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: September 24, 2014, 04:08:12 pm »

Politico: Warner's still very vulnerable!

-----------

Warner's only polling at 51%, which suggests a stronger challenger may have had a real shot (Bill Bolling, or maybe McDonnell/Obenshain/Forbes) . But Gillespie isn't the right one, and Warner may even lead at the beginning of the count despite VA's republican counting bias. (In order to be leading at the beginning of the count as a democrat in Virginia, you need to win the election by ~16 points+, and Warner appears to be reaching and exceeding that threshold)

Been following the news about him lately? Tongue

Anyway, Ed Gillespie is clearly on track to give Warnercare a good thrashing.
That's why I put 'maybe' before listing his name.
Logged
Bandit3 the Worker
Populist3
Concerned Citizen
*****
Posts: 7,115


Political Matrix
E: -10.00, S: -9.92

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: September 24, 2014, 04:23:45 pm »

Warner would be doing even better if he came out against "right-to-work."
Logged
Mr. Reactionary
blackraisin
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,898
United States


Political Matrix
E: 5.45, S: -3.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: September 24, 2014, 04:28:37 pm »

Warner would be doing even better if he came out against "right-to-work."

Logged
DrScholl
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,831
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.55, S: -3.30

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: September 24, 2014, 04:38:08 pm »

Politico: Warner's still very vulnerable!

-----------

Warner's only polling at 51%, which suggests a stronger challenger may have had a real shot (Bill Bolling, or maybe McDonnell/Obenshain/Forbes) . But Gillespie isn't the right one, and Warner may even lead at the beginning of the count despite VA's republican counting bias. (In order to be leading at the beginning of the count as a democrat in Virginia, you need to win the election by ~16 points+, and Warner appears to be reaching and exceeding that threshold)

With his legal problems, McDonnell would lose badly, even in a wave.
Logged
Nat. Sec. Council Member Dwarven Dragon
Dwarven Dragon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,015
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.55, S: 0.87

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: September 24, 2014, 07:16:49 pm »

Warner would be doing even better if he came out against "right-to-work."
That would harm his status as a moderate and knock him down a few points. Part of why Warner is so safe is because he's not a Warren/Baldwin type of liberal.
Logged
Bandit3 the Worker
Populist3
Concerned Citizen
*****
Posts: 7,115


Political Matrix
E: -10.00, S: -9.92

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: September 24, 2014, 07:18:32 pm »

Warner would be doing even better if he came out against "right-to-work."
That would harm his status as a moderate and knock him down a few points. Part of why Warner is so safe is because he's not a Warren/Baldwin type of liberal.

Even Steve Beshear is against "right-to-work." You don't have to be Elizabeth Warren to be against "right-to-work."
Logged
KCDem
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,929


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: September 24, 2014, 10:12:01 pm »

This polling firm is junk, but Warner is obviously ahead.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 18.713 seconds with 15 queries.