|           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
March 29, 2020, 01:54:53 am
News:
If you are having trouble logging in due to invalid user name / pass:

Consider resetting your account password, as you may have forgotten it over time if using a password manager.

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2014 Gubernatorial Election Polls
  2014 Senatorial Election Polls
  MI-PPP: Peters +7
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: MI-PPP: Peters +7  (Read 1512 times)
RogueBeaver
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,842
Canada


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: September 09, 2014, 09:54:50 am »

43/36. Land is toxic at 32/49.
Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,631
Austria


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: September 09, 2014, 09:56:30 am »

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
Logged
backtored
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 502
Vatican City State


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: September 09, 2014, 09:58:25 am »

Sounds about right to me.  Democrats have spent a lot of money in the state, which is wonderful.  I want Land to win, but if her contribution to the GOP is siphoning off a lot of money that won't be spent in NC, CO, AR, IA, etc., then that is a very worthy contribution.
Logged
ModerateVAVoter
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,424


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: September 09, 2014, 09:59:10 am »

Land is 2014's Linda McMahon. Decoy.
Logged
dmmidmi
dmwestmi
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,095
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: September 09, 2014, 10:35:11 am »

This raises some eyebrows:

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

There is no way that I'd answer "Win the World Series," because I don't want to create bad juju--I imagine a whole bunch of respondents feel the same way. It's kind of interesting that Obama and Romney voters have almost identical approvals for Brad Ausmus. Though, I am surprised that men approve of him at a higher level than women. He is a member of the Handsome Club:

Logged
Chief Justice windjammer
windjammer
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,015
France


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: September 09, 2014, 10:35:49 am »

Logged
Fuzzybigfoot
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,211
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: September 09, 2014, 10:53:43 am »

Dominating. 
Logged
Trends are real, and I f**king hate it
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 51,453
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: September 09, 2014, 11:14:11 am »

Logged
Maxwell
mah519
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,518
Germany


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: September 09, 2014, 02:38:02 pm »


I'm starting to agree with this. That being said, there is still time.
Logged
Kevin
Concerned Citizen
*****
Posts: 5,401
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: September 09, 2014, 04:22:44 pm »
« Edited: September 09, 2014, 04:24:31 pm by Kevin »

I think this poll is off (the numbers are way too high). Peter's is also well under 50% at this time as well. Lastly, there are alot of reasons as to why PPP can't be trusted this cycle.

That being said I still think Peter's is ahead by a 2-4 point margin.
Logged
dmmidmi
dmwestmi
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,095
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: September 10, 2014, 09:33:48 am »

I think this poll is off (the numbers are way too high). Peter's is also well under 50% at this time as well. Lastly, there are alot of reasons as to why PPP can't be trusted this cycle.

That being said I still think Peter's is ahead by a 2-4 point margin.

Is any of this based on anything besides gut feeling?
Logged
International Brotherhood of Bernard
interstate73
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 652


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: September 10, 2014, 09:43:14 am »

I think this poll is off (the numbers are way too high). Peter's is also well under 50% at this time as well. Lastly, there are alot of reasons as to why PPP can't be trusted this cycle.

That being said I still think Peter's is ahead by a 2-4 point margin.
And those reasons are? Last I saw they were one of the most accurate (if not the most accurate) pollsters in 2012.
Logged
Impeachment Inquiry
DrScholl
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,833
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.55, S: -3.30


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: September 10, 2014, 11:40:02 am »

I think this poll is off (the numbers are way too high). Peter's is also well under 50% at this time as well. Lastly, there are alot of reasons as to why PPP can't be trusted this cycle.

That being said I still think Peter's is ahead by a 2-4 point margin.

Land has just proven to be a terrible candidate. The numbers reflect that.
Logged
Free Bird
TheHawk
Concerned Citizen
*****
Posts: 5,892
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.84, S: -5.48

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: September 10, 2014, 01:57:21 pm »

Logged
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length
Logout

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines