MI-EPIC-MRA: Peters by 9
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 20, 2024, 09:57:00 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2014 Gubernatorial Election Polls
  2014 Senatorial Election Polls
  MI-EPIC-MRA: Peters by 9
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: MI-EPIC-MRA: Peters by 9  (Read 1490 times)
Anti Democrat Democrat Club
SawxDem
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,206
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: July 17, 2014, 11:00:14 PM »

http://www.freep.com/article/20140717/NEWS06/307170177/poll-snyder-schauer-land-peters

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Looks like math wins again.
Logged
RogueBeaver
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,058
Canada
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: July 17, 2014, 11:05:04 PM »

While I always thought Peters by 7-9, wouldn't be surprised if it was higher.
Logged
Mr. Illini
liberty142
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,869
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.26, S: -3.30

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: July 18, 2014, 12:28:34 AM »

Dominating !
Logged
Lief 🗽
Lief
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 45,034


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: July 18, 2014, 12:32:17 AM »

Safe D.
Logged
dmmidmi
dmwestmi
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,095
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: July 18, 2014, 06:42:17 AM »

I'm feeling really good about this, now that even $h!tty, GOP-leaning, Michigan-based pollsters are showing a consistent lead.
Logged
Oldiesfreak1854
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,674
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: July 18, 2014, 07:07:24 AM »
« Edited: July 18, 2014, 07:13:46 AM by Oldiesfreak1854 »

I wouldn't exactly call a 9-pt lead "dominating."  It's certainly a significant lead, but not a huge one.  And there's still plenty of time for things to change.

Plus, there's no way Snyder is only leading by 3 points.  Most polls have had it higher than that.
Logged
dmmidmi
dmwestmi
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,095
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: July 18, 2014, 07:17:33 AM »

I wouldn't exactly call a 9-pt lead "dominating."  It's certainly a significant lead, but not a huge one.  And there's still plenty of time for things to change.

Plus, there's no way Snyder is only leading by 3 points.  Most polls have had it higher than that.

Nearly every single poll (except for the Denno Research poll) has shown Schauer closing the gap since May. You're going to have to open your mind to the idea that--while Schauer obviously isn't leading right now--this is getting a lot closer.
Logged
Free Bird
TheHawk
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,917
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.84, S: -5.48

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: July 18, 2014, 06:27:51 PM »

If this was a Land poll you'd all call it garbage.
#ConfirmationBias
Logged
DrScholl
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,410
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.55, S: -3.30

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: July 18, 2014, 06:31:48 PM »

Land is a poor candidate, she attended a Chamber of Commerce event and failed at answering questions, so much so, that the Chamber endorsed Peters. Not that this really made much of a difference, as Peters was always going to pull away, but Land proving to be a poor candidate doesn't support the notion that this race will get closer later on, she just doesn't have what it takes to pull that off.
Logged
Flake
Flo
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,688
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: July 18, 2014, 10:04:25 PM »

New Poll: Michigan Senator by EPIC/MRA on 2014-07-17

Summary: D: 45%, R: 36%, I: 0%, U: 19%

Poll Source URL: Full Poll Details
Logged
Landon1993
Rookie
**
Posts: 25
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.94, S: -4.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: July 21, 2014, 03:02:02 AM »

I'm confident Peters wins this one, with or without the poll.

However, I'm pretty liberal and am leaning towards voting for Snyder, so I think Snyder will do better than most people give him credit for (I have a hard time voting for many Republicans). The Governors race leans Republican, and when people go into the voting booth and realize they can repeal the right to work law with a ballot imitative down the road.... , they will vote Snyder .
Logged
dmmidmi
dmwestmi
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,095
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: July 21, 2014, 09:30:39 AM »

Land is a poor candidate, she attended a Chamber of Commerce event and failed at answering questions, so much so, that the Chamber endorsed Peters. Not that this really made much of a difference, as Peters was always going to pull away, but Land proving to be a poor candidate doesn't support the notion that this race will get closer later on, she just doesn't have what it takes to pull that off.

To those of us who know better, the "Terri Lynn Land is a Formidable Candidate" talk has always been hilarious. To be fair, Nate Silver was guilty of this. As a Michigan native, he should know better.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.036 seconds with 13 queries.