Your opinion of the following #4...

[Moooooo]

FreeRepublic.com
The Wall Street Journal
Ann Coulter
Trent Lott

DemocraticUnderground.com
The New York Times
Noam Chomsky
Barbara Boxer

Very Positive, Positive, Neutral, Negative, Very Negative

[TomC]

FreeRepublic.com -negative
The Wall Street Journal -positive, but not for politics
Ann Coulter- very negative
Trent Lott- negative

DemocraticUnderground.com- neutral
The New York Times- positive
Noam Chomsky- unsure
Barbara Boxer- positive

[Jake]

FreeRepublic.com    Very Negative
The Wall Street Journal Positive
Ann Coulter Neutral
Trent Lott Very Positive

DemocraticUnderground.com Very Negative
The New York Times  Neutral
Noam Chomsky Negative
Barbara Boxer Very Negative

[A18]

FreeRepublic.com - Neutral, because I haven't wasted any time there
The Wall Street Journal - Positive
Ann Coulter - Negative; hack
Trent Lott - Neutral; he never stood for anything, and that's what finished him

DemocraticUnderground.com - Very negative; all I ever see is trollish crap. On the day Reagan died, they were all "rot in hell!"
The New York Times - Negative, but I don't read it, so it's just based on what I've heard from other people
Noam Chomsky - Who?
Barbara Boxer - Very negative; go recount Ohio

[Sam Spade]

FreeRepublic.com  - Negative
The Wall Street Journal - Positive; (all parts of the paper all well-thought out)
Ann Coulter - Neutral/Negative; (I really don't care much about her, frankly, but if anything she goes over the top too often)
Trent Lott - Neutral; (don't really care about him either)

DemocraticUnderground.com - Very Negative
The New York Times - Neutral; (editorial page/front page - negative (unintelligent liberal malarky), (rest of paper - positive (arts, entertainment sections are the best in the country)
Noam Chomsky - Very Negative; (idiot)
Barbara Boxer - Very Negative; (people like her are the death of the Democrats outside the coasts)

As a FYI, I despise both FR and DU, however FR doesn't ban anyone who doesn't agree with the "standard party line", so they are nearly always more moderate (and less kook) than DU.  For example, I could survive easily at FR if I wanted to; I would probably be banned at DU in 5, amybe 10 minutes.

[Nym90]

Neutral on the WSJ, NYT, and Boxer. Negative on the rest.

[nclib]

FreeRepublic.com - Very negative
The Wall Street Journal - Negative
Ann Coulter - Very negative
Trent Lott - Very negative

DemocraticUnderground.com - Neutral
The New York Times - Very positive
Noam Chomsky - Very positive
Barbara Boxer - Very positive

[Erc]

FreeRepublic.com - Neutral
The Wall Street Journal - Very Positive
Ann Coulter - Negative
Trent Lott - Positive

DemocraticUnderground.com - Very Negative
The New York Times - Neutral
Noam Chomsky - Negative
Barbara Boxer - Very Negative

[Moooooo]

 FreeRepublic.com - Neutral (I get a good laugh out of that site once or twice a day.)
The Wall Street Journal - Neutral
Ann Coulter - Very negative (I cannot put into words how much I despise this woman.  I wouldnt piss on her if she was on fire.)
Trent Lott - Negative

DemocraticUnderground.com - Positive (A nice place to rant)
The New York Times - Positive
Noam Chomsky - Negative
Barbara Boxer - Positive

[Jake]

I think I'll register at DU and give it a whirl

[AuH2O]

FreeRepublic.com - negative
The Wall Street Journal - negative
Ann Coulter - neutral
Trent Lott - positive

DemocraticUnderground.com - very negative
The New York Times - very negative
Noam Chomsky - neutral
Barbara Boxer - very negative

[dazzleman]

FreeRepublic.com - Neutral
The Wall Street Journal - Positive
Ann Coulter - Neutral to positive; I find her pretty funny
Trent Lott - Negative

DemocraticUnderground.com - Very negative
New York Times - Negative to Very Negative
Noam Chomsky - Very negative
Barbara Boxer - Very negative

Very Positive, Positive, Neutral, Negative, Very Negative

You must be logged in to read this quote.

[TheWildCard]

FreeRepublic.com Negative
The Wall Street Journal Positive
Ann Coulter Negative
Trent Lott Neutral (Just a man who needs to keep his mouth shut)

DemocraticUnderground.com Very Negative
The New York Times Negative
Noam Chomsky Negative
Barbara Boxer Very Negative

[Rob]

I think I'll register at DU and give it a whirl

I tried to register there once, but those bastards don't accept registrations from free e-mail services unless you email them. I would have been banned anyway, so I didn't bother.

[Smash255]

 FreeRepublic.com--  Negative
The Wall Street Journal  Negartive
Ann Coulter     VERY Negative
Trent Lott     VERY Negative

DemocraticUnderground.com  Positive
The New York Times    Very Positive
Noam Chomsky   Netrual
Barbara Boxer   Very Positive

[TeePee4Prez]

FreeRepublic.com- Negative
The Wall Street Journal- Positive, not on politics though
Ann Coulter- Very negative
Trent Lott- Very negative

DemocraticUnderground.com- Positive, but I've been called a "racist Repuke" on there
The New York Times- Positive
Noam Chomsky- Positive
Barbara Boxer- Positive

Very Positive, Positive, Neutral, Negative, Very Negative

[opebo]

FreeRepublic.com - Negative
The Wall Street Journal - Negative
Ann Coulter - Very Negative
Trent Lott - Very Negative

DemocraticUnderground.com - Neutral
The New York Times - Very Positive
Noam Chomsky - Positive
Barbara Boxer - Very Positive

[Colin]

FreeRepublic.com Neutral
The Wall Street Journal Very Positive
Ann Coulter Neutral
Trent Lott Negative

DemocraticUnderground.com Very Negative
The New York Times Negative
Noam Chomsky Very Negative
Barbara Boxer Netural

[○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└]

FreeRepublic.com - Very negative
The Wall Street Journal - Negative
Ann Coulter - Very negative
Trent Lott - Very negative

DemocraticUnderground.com - Positive
The New York Times - Neutral
Noam Chomsky - Positive
Barbara Boxer - Very positive

[○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└]

FreeRepublic.com- Positive (they're respectful of dissenting opinions)

No, they ban dissenters.

[Bono]

FreeRepublic.com - Neutral
The Wall Street Journal - Neutral/NEgative(good for stock market stuff, bad for politics)
Ann Coulter Neutral (I just don't care about her=
Trent Lott Neutral

DemocraticUnderground.com Neutral( I could care less about those future republicans)
The New York Times NEgative
Noam Chomsky Very Negative - Horrible Crypto-Statist who as the rest of his movement poses as anarchist.
Barbara Boxer Negative

[Rob]

FreeRepublic.com- Positive (they're respectful of dissenting opinions)

No, they ban dissenters.

Maybe liberal trolls. DU bans anyone who doesn't strictly follow the left wing line. That even includes some liberals.

[Dave from Michigan]

free Republic- positive
Wall Street Journal  very positive
AnnCoulter  nuetral- goes to far sometimes but makes good points other times
Trent Lott  neutral

Democrats underground very very negative but funny I go there to read posts if I need a good laugh
New York Times negative
Noam Chomsky ?  From what I hear in this thread negative
Barbra Boxer very negative

[Moooooo]

Maybe liberal trolls. DU bans anyone who doesn't strictly follow the left wing line. That even includes some liberals.

I havent been banned and I consistantly shoot down some of their far left ideas.  I speak out against partial birth abortion, illegal immigration, the UN, the "boogy man" aka Diebold, etc...

Maybe, Im just a nice guy. 

[Moooooo]

Maybe you'll even get some of them to change their minds on things they now take to be gospel.

Its tough.  When you speculate about 2008 over there and mention names like Warner, Bayh, or Bredesen.  The lynch mob comes out of the wood work.