MI: Glengariff Group: Peters (D) leads but 25% undecided
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 20, 2024, 11:06:24 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2014 Gubernatorial Election Polls
  2014 Senatorial Election Polls
  MI: Glengariff Group: Peters (D) leads but 25% undecided
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: MI: Glengariff Group: Peters (D) leads but 25% undecided  (Read 1687 times)
Miles
MilesC56
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,325
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: May 27, 2014, 11:40:58 PM »

Report.

Peters (D)- 40%
Land (R)- 35%
Unsure- 25%
Logged
Lief 🗽
Lief
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 45,036


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: May 28, 2014, 12:00:37 AM »

Safe D.
Logged
windjammer
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,543
France


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: May 28, 2014, 05:07:21 AM »

Glengariff Group? Good pollster?
Logged
JRP1994
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,048


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: May 28, 2014, 08:20:59 AM »


Their final 2012 poll (5/10 - 5/11) showed Obama +5% (45% to 40%)
Logged
Oldiesfreak1854
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,674
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: May 28, 2014, 08:32:51 AM »

I'm pretty skeptical of this.  I still rate this as a Toss-up, and I guarantee it will be close.
Logged
Gass3268
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,581
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: May 28, 2014, 08:46:51 AM »

Logged
windjammer
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,543
France


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: May 28, 2014, 09:04:12 AM »

Please Cheesy
Logged
RogueBeaver
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,058
Canada
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: May 28, 2014, 09:05:37 AM »

This was always Likely D.
Logged
Person Man
Angry_Weasel
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,745
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: May 28, 2014, 09:07:34 AM »

I'd think this race would a good candidate as a harbinger for 2016 or is Peters a poor candidate or Land pretty moderate?
Logged
Niemeyerite
JulioMadrid
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,807
Spain


Political Matrix
E: -8.65, S: -9.04

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: May 28, 2014, 01:49:14 PM »

I'm pretty skeptical of this.  I still rate this as a Toss-up, and I guarantee it will be close.

Yes, in the same way OH-Gov is a toss-up for AdamFitzGewahetever.
Logged
publicunofficial
angryGreatness
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,010
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: May 28, 2014, 02:42:17 PM »

I'd think this race would a good candidate as a harbinger for 2016 or is Peters a poor candidate or Land pretty moderate?


Land has statewide recognition, Peters was only known to the citizens of his CD aka 1/14th of the state. As Peters' recognition has gone up, so has his numbers against Land. Something every non-hack knew would happen as soon as this race started.
Logged
windjammer
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,543
France


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: May 28, 2014, 02:43:35 PM »

I think this pollster is relatively accurate (they polled the gubernational as well: Snyder +10 with of course many undecided)
Logged
ElectionAtlas
Atlas Proginator
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,629
United States


P P P
WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: May 28, 2014, 04:49:29 PM »

New Poll: Michigan Senator by Glengariff Group on 2014-05-22

Summary: D: 40%, R: 35%, U: 25%

Poll Source URL: Full Poll Details
Logged
Person Man
Angry_Weasel
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,745
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: May 28, 2014, 05:30:01 PM »

I'd think this race would a good candidate as a harbinger for 2016 or is Peters a poor candidate or Land pretty moderate?


Land has statewide recognition, Peters was only known to the citizens of his CD aka 1/14th of the state. As Peters' recognition has gone up, so has his numbers against Land. Something every non-hack knew would happen as soon as this race started.

I see. So, this is a race where most undecideds will go with one candidate over another.
Logged
dmmidmi
dmwestmi
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,095
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: May 30, 2014, 12:27:18 PM »

I'd think this race would a good candidate as a harbinger for 2016 or is Peters a poor candidate or Land pretty moderate?


Land has statewide recognition, Peters was only known to the citizens of his CD aka 1/14th of the state. As Peters' recognition has gone up, so has his numbers against Land. Something every non-hack knew would happen as soon as this race started.

This, pretty much. Peters' name recognition was probably slightly higher than the 400,000 people in his district, but not by much.

Now that people are learning who he is, he's starting to lead in polls. This isn't surprising, and will likely continue to be the trend.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.032 seconds with 14 queries.