|           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
March 29, 2020, 08:24:37 pm
News:
If you are having trouble logging in due to invalid user name / pass:

Consider resetting your account password, as you may have forgotten it over time if using a password manager.

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2014 Gubernatorial Election Polls
  2014 Senatorial Election Polls
  MI: Mitchell Research: Land leading by 6
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: MI: Mitchell Research: Land leading by 6  (Read 2359 times)
Miles
MilesC56
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,336
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: April 15, 2014, 12:18:27 pm »

Report.

Land (R)- 44%
Peters (D)- 38%
Logged
Marxist-Cornpopist Thought
SawxDem
Concerned Citizen
*****
Posts: 9,370
United States



Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: April 15, 2014, 12:18:56 pm »

lol
Logged
Gass3268
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,678
United States



Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: April 15, 2014, 12:32:36 pm »

Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,957
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: April 15, 2014, 12:33:58 pm »

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/docs/2012/Mitchell_MI_0826.pdf

If the election for the United States Senate was being held today and the candidates were Debbie Stabenow the Democrat and Pete Hoekstra the Republican who would you be voting for? If you are voting for or leaning towards Stabenow press 1, voting for or leaning towards Hoekstra press 2, if you’re not sure yet press 3.
Stabenow 44
Hoekstra 45
Not sure yet 11
Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,640
Austria


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: April 15, 2014, 01:03:17 pm »

Poll results from Michigan-based pollsters should be ignored.

They simply can't poll their own state.
Logged
Impeachment Inquiry
DrScholl
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.55, S: -3.30


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: April 15, 2014, 01:33:23 pm »

The usual suspects (not saying names) will be here soon to lecture about how this seat is Safe R.
Logged
GaussLaw
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,283
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: April 15, 2014, 10:13:10 pm »

Looks like this will be a LANDslide, folks.  

#UnskewedPolls #LandDomination #GOPSenateTakeover  #Romneymentum

Smiley
Logged
ModerateVAVoter
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,424


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: April 15, 2014, 10:17:47 pm »

Looks like this will be a LANDslide, folks.  

Lol, that's a good one.
Logged
Marxist-Cornpopist Thought
SawxDem
Concerned Citizen
*****
Posts: 9,370
United States



Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: April 19, 2014, 11:36:04 am »

Turns out it was done for a free market think tank.

Let's not kid ourselves here - this is an internal disguised as a regular poll.
Logged
Citizen (The) Doctor
ArchangelZero
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,201
United States


Political Matrix
E: -3.23, S: -4.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: April 20, 2014, 04:57:47 pm »

It is a bit troubling to see Peters with still such low name recognition almost 6 months out.
Logged
Cory Booker
olawakandi
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 34,106
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: April 20, 2014, 05:08:43 pm »

The last Harper poll showed Peters 3 pts out, well within MOE, an R firm.
Logged
Torie
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 38,043
Samoa


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: April 25, 2014, 11:56:20 am »

Well, given the psephological truism, that as MI goes, so goes NH, at this rate the "projected" Pub gain in the Senate has hit double digits:  WV, AR, SD, MT, LA, NC, AK, CO, MI, NH. The "only" issue remaining is if the Pubs can make it a dirty dozen (IA, VA). Tongue  And there is MN out there too come to think of it. Who said 13 was an unlucky number? So many juicy targets - a veritable embarrassment of riches. 
Logged
Never
Never Convinced
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,627
Political Matrix
E: 4.65, S: 3.30

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: April 26, 2014, 01:13:32 pm »

Well, given the psephological truism, that as MI goes, so goes NH, at this rate the "projected" Pub gain in the Senate has hit double digits:  WV, AR, SD, MT, LA, NC, AK, CO, MI, NH. The "only" issue remaining is if the Pubs can make it a dirty dozen (IA, VA). Tongue  And there is MN out there too come to think of it. Who said 13 was an unlucky number? So many juicy targets - a veritable embarrassment of riches. 

Interesting perspective. I suppose that it would make sense to expect Scott Brown to win if Land can defeat Braely. The Michigan Senate race seems competitive, but I wouldn't even say Lean R unless Land manages to get above 48-50% in the polls, because Michigan is a Democratic state, and I am not sure if Land can overcome that, even though Braely appears does not appear to be a strong nominee. You probably don't have to be a great Democratic candidate to win in Michigan, but you would have to be a great Republican. Land might be good (she has won statewide), but not great, and she still needs to prove herself despite her lead in the polls. Still, she is better than Hoekstra, so this might be a race to watch closely.
Logged
MalaspinaGold
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 990


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: April 26, 2014, 01:54:14 pm »

Well, given the psephological truism, that as MI goes, so goes NH, at this rate the "projected" Pub gain in the Senate has hit double digits:  WV, AR, SD, MT, LA, NC, AK, CO, MI, NH. The "only" issue remaining is if the Pubs can make it a dirty dozen (IA, VA). Tongue  And there is MN out there too come to think of it. Who said 13 was an unlucky number? So many juicy targets - a veritable embarrassment of riches. 
It seems krazen has hacked Torie's account
Logged
Marxist-Cornpopist Thought
SawxDem
Concerned Citizen
*****
Posts: 9,370
United States



Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: April 26, 2014, 02:31:20 pm »

Well, given the psephological truism, that as MI goes, so goes NH, at this rate the "projected" Pub gain in the Senate has hit double digits:  WV, AR, SD, MT, LA, NC, AK, CO, MI, NH. The "only" issue remaining is if the Pubs can make it a dirty dozen (IA, VA). Tongue  And there is MN out there too come to think of it. Who said 13 was an unlucky number? So many juicy targets - a veritable embarrassment of riches. 

Interesting perspective. I suppose that it would make sense to expect Scott Brown to win if Land can defeat Braely. The Michigan Senate race seems competitive, but I wouldn't even say Lean R unless Land manages to get above 48-50% in the polls, because Michigan is a Democratic state, and I am not sure if Land can overcome that, even though Braely appears does not appear to be a strong nominee. You probably don't have to be a great Democratic candidate to win in Michigan, but you would have to be a great Republican. Land might be good (she has won statewide), but not great, and she still needs to prove herself despite her lead in the polls. Still, she is better than Hoekstra, so this might be a race to watch closely.

Because a light-blue state with an A-list candidate and the most competitive governor's race in the country is comparable to a popular Senator, a horrifically disorganized state party, and the next Bill Weld.

Your concern trolling is admirable.
Logged
pbrower2a
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,031
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: May 02, 2014, 12:38:12 pm »

Poll results from Michigan-based pollsters should be ignored.

They simply can't poll their own state.

I wish that Quinnipiac would poll Michigan. The junk pollsters would disappear.
Logged
Vosem
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,043
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.13, S: -6.26

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: May 03, 2014, 01:18:58 pm »

I suppose that it would make sense to expect Scott Brown to win if Land can defeat Braely.

I think you have a few names mixed up.
Logged
Dave Leip
leip
Administrator
Sr. Member
*****
Posts: 3,375
United States


P P P
WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: May 04, 2014, 11:52:29 am »

New Poll: Michigan Senator by Mitchell Research on 2014-04-09

Summary: D: 38%, R: 44%, U: 18%

Poll Source URL: Full Poll Details
Logged
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length
Logout

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines