Mathematics VII: matchsticks
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 30, 2024, 11:11:28 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Forum Community
  Off-topic Board (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, The Mikado, YE)
  Mathematics VII: matchsticks
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: How many possible triangles?
#1
1
#2
2
#3
3
#4
4
#5
5
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results


Author Topic: Mathematics VII: matchsticks  (Read 605 times)

excelsus
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 692
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: March 31, 2014, 08:00:40 PM »
« edited: March 31, 2014, 09:02:52 PM by excelsus »

How many triangles can you build by using six matches?



Edit Smiley : The vertices of the triangles, of course, have to be the endpoints of the matchsticks.
Logged
H.E. VOLODYMYR ZELENKSYY
Alfred F. Jones
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,131
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: March 31, 2014, 08:26:51 PM »

A theoretically infinite amount, although if you want us to do the maximum amount of triangles in one matchstick combination I believe the answer would be to make a Star of David, thus creating eight triangles.
Logged
True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)
Ernest
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 42,144
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: March 31, 2014, 08:32:42 PM »

At least eight, assuming that the vertices of the triangles do not have to be the endpoints of the matchsticks. Use the matchsticks to form a star of David.  If you do require the vertices to be endpoints, then at least five. Use four to build a tetrahedron with four triangles and then use the remaining two to form a fifth triangle using one of the tetrahedron edges as the third side of the fifth triangle. I don't know why one is listed as an option.  Even someone using the most naive method of forming triangles should be able make at least two.

Logged
H.E. VOLODYMYR ZELENKSYY
Alfred F. Jones
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,131
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: March 31, 2014, 08:42:07 PM »

At least eight, assuming that the vertices of the triangles do not have to be the endpoints of the matchsticks. Use the matchsticks to form a star of David.  If you do require the vertices to be endpoints, then at least five. Use four to build a tetrahedron with four triangles and then use the remaining two to form a fifth triangle using one of the tetrahedron edges as the third side of the fifth triangle. I don't know why one is listed as an option.  Even someone using the most naive method of forming triangles should be able make at least two.

I'm sure there's someone out there who thinks you'd make one triangle with sides two matchsticks in length and throw up your hands in despair.
Logged

excelsus
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 692
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: March 31, 2014, 09:06:43 PM »

At least eight, assuming that the vertices of the triangles do not have to be the endpoints of the matchsticks. Use the matchsticks to form a star of David.  If you do require the vertices to be endpoints, then at least five. Use four to build a tetrahedron with four triangles and then use the remaining two to form a fifth triangle using one of the tetrahedron edges as the third side of the fifth triangle. I don't know why one is listed as an option.  Even someone using the most naive method of forming triangles should be able make at least two.

Since I didn't include the "eight" option, your second answer is correct. Congrats!

P.S.: I listed the 1 as an option to make it look more aesthetic.
Logged
SUSAN CRUSHBONE
a Person
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,735
Antarctica


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: April 01, 2014, 04:15:57 AM »

If you do require the vertices to be endpoints, then at least five. Use four to build a tetrahedron with four triangles and then use the remaining two to form a fifth triangle using one of the tetrahedron edges as the third side of the fifth triangle.
i would've thought you need all six matches to form a tetrahedron...
Logged
muon2
Moderators
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,798


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: April 01, 2014, 07:08:13 AM »

If you do require the vertices to be endpoints, then at least five. Use four to build a tetrahedron with four triangles and then use the remaining two to form a fifth triangle using one of the tetrahedron edges as the third side of the fifth triangle.
i would've thought you need all six matches to form a tetrahedron...

Yes, a tetrahedron has six edges of equal length giving four faces. In general Euler's formula for non-intersecting polyhedrons is that faces + vertices - edges = 2.
Logged
True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)
Ernest
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 42,144
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: April 01, 2014, 09:28:25 AM »

If you do require the vertices to be endpoints, then at least five. Use four to build a tetrahedron with four triangles and then use the remaining two to form a fifth triangle using one of the tetrahedron edges as the third side of the fifth triangle.
i would've thought you need all six matches to form a tetrahedron...

Yes, a tetrahedron has six edges of equal length giving four faces. In general Euler's formula for non-intersecting polyhedrons is that faces + vertices - edges = 2.

Yup.  Brainfart.  I was thinking of the four one needs to build a caltrop.  So yeah, Four is the answer with a tetrahedron.  It even makes more sense, since usually with this sort of problem the author doesn't intend a solution that has dangly bits like that extra triangle I got by using two fewer sticks for the core pyramid.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.038 seconds with 13 queries.