Iran says warships headed close to US borders
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 09, 2024, 02:19:46 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  International General Discussion (Moderators: afleitch, Hash)
  Iran says warships headed close to US borders
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Iran says warships headed close to US borders  (Read 1204 times)
FDRfan1985
Rookie
**
Posts: 117


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: February 08, 2014, 09:03:10 PM »

TEHRAN, Iran (AP) — Iranian warships dispatched to the Atlantic Ocean will travel close to U.S. maritime borders for the first time, a senior Iranian naval commander said Saturday.

The commander of Iran's Northern Navy Fleet, Admiral Afshin Rezayee Haddad, said the vessels have already entered the Atlantic Ocean via waters near South Africa, the official IRNA news agency reported.

The fleet, consisting of a destroyer and a helicopter-carrying supply ship, began its voyage last month from the southern Iranian port city of Bandar Abbas. The ships, carrying some 30 navy academy cadets for training along with their regular crews, are on a three-month mission.

The voyage comes amid an ongoing push by Iran to demonstrate its ability to project power across the Middle East and beyond.

IRNA quoted Haddad as saying the fleet is approaching U.S. maritime borders for the first time. The Islamic Republic considers the move as a response to U.S. naval deployments near its own coastlines. The U.S. Navy's 5th fleet is based in Bahrain, just across the Persian Gulf.


Iran BSing or they really that stupid?
Logged
True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)
Ernest
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 42,144
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: February 08, 2014, 09:18:07 PM »

As long as they stay beyond the 12-mile limit, there ain't a lot we can do about it without being hypocrites, so militarily they ain't being stupid.  Politically ...
Logged
Snowstalker Mk. II
Snowstalker
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,414
Palestinian Territory, Occupied


Political Matrix
E: -7.10, S: -4.35

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: February 08, 2014, 09:37:00 PM »

We do this all the time to other countries.
Logged
AkSaber
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,315
United States


Political Matrix
E: 9.16, S: -8.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: February 08, 2014, 09:40:47 PM »

We do this all the time to other countries.

With forces a lot more menacing than a destroyer and supply ship.
Logged
True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)
Ernest
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 42,144
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: February 08, 2014, 10:35:52 PM »

At least their destroyers are destroyer-sized instead of the cruiser-sized behemoths we call destroyers. Indeed, the new Zumwalt-class destroyers are so large that they would be classified as battleships under the interwar Washington and London Naval Treaties.
Logged
CatoMinor
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,007
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: February 08, 2014, 10:50:28 PM »

Indeed, the new Zumwalt-class destroyers are so large that they would be classified as battleships under the interwar Washington and London Naval Treaties.
They almost look like an old school sub lol.

Logged
Atlas Has Shrugged
ChairmanSanchez
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 38,095
United States


Political Matrix
E: 5.29, S: -5.04


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: February 08, 2014, 11:06:39 PM »

OMG THERE GONNA INVADE US!?!?
Logged
Silent Hunter
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,334
United Kingdom


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: February 09, 2014, 04:21:01 AM »

At least their destroyers are destroyer-sized instead of the cruiser-sized behemoths we call destroyers. Indeed, the new Zumwalt-class destroyers are so large that they would be classified as battleships under the interwar Washington and London Naval Treaties.

Er... the Iranian press may call it a destroyer, but most classifiers would deem them light frigates.
Logged
True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)
Ernest
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 42,144
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: February 09, 2014, 02:53:37 PM »

At least their destroyers are destroyer-sized instead of the cruiser-sized behemoths we call destroyers. Indeed, the new Zumwalt-class destroyers are so large that they would be classified as battleships under the interwar Washington and London Naval Treaties.

Er... the Iranian press may call it a destroyer, but most classifiers would deem them light frigates.

That's because destroyers have gotten so big, we needed to reuse the word frigate to describe ships that were once of the size called destroyers.
Logged
bullmoose88
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,515


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: February 09, 2014, 11:29:16 PM »

At least their destroyers are destroyer-sized instead of the cruiser-sized behemoths we call destroyers. Indeed, the new Zumwalt-class destroyers are so large that they would be classified as battleships under the interwar Washington and London Naval Treaties.

Er... the Iranian press may call it a destroyer, but most classifiers would deem them light frigates.

That's because destroyers have gotten so big, we needed to reuse the word frigate to describe ships that were once of the size called destroyers.

Lord only knows if we had gone through with the CGX, how big that really would have ended up. 
Logged
True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)
Ernest
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 42,144
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: February 10, 2014, 01:05:19 AM »

At least their destroyers are destroyer-sized instead of the cruiser-sized behemoths we call destroyers. Indeed, the new Zumwalt-class destroyers are so large that they would be classified as battleships under the interwar Washington and London Naval Treaties.

Er... the Iranian press may call it a destroyer, but most classifiers would deem them light frigates.

That's because destroyers have gotten so big, we needed to reuse the word frigate to describe ships that were once of the size called destroyers.

Lord only knows if we had gone through with the CGX, how big that really would have ended up. 

The last CG(X) design before the project was cancelled was 23,000 tons, in between the Des Moines- and Alaska-class cruisers of WWII in size.
Logged
Indy Texas
independentTX
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,273
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.52, S: -3.48

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: February 10, 2014, 05:00:17 PM »

US to Iran:

Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.033 seconds with 11 queries.