Pacific Council: Pacific Surplus Act (Approved)

[DemPGH]

You must be logged in to read this quote.

Sponsor: Politics Junkie

This should be pretty easy to deal with, so I want to do it before the Rural Housing one.

This is pretty self explanatory and is something I support. Unanimous agreement may be difficult in the foreseeable future, so just fyi on that.

[Sec. of State Superique]

Part of the surplus should go for reducing the debt.

[PJ]

This is to secure any money for the region should we get a surplus.

[GAworth]

I hate to be a nosy neighbor, but since this was a Midwestern law, might I suggest you think of passing a budget first before you worry about any surplus bill.

[PJ]

I hate to be a nosy neighbor, but since this was a Midwestern law, might I suggest you think of passing a budget first before you worry about any surplus bill.

The budget is being debated honey. I just wanted to pass this so that it will be in place in the case of a surplus.

[GAworth]

I hate to be a nosy neighbor, but since this was a Midwestern law, might I suggest you think of passing a budget first before you worry about any surplus bill.

The budget is being debated honey. I just wanted to pass this so that it will be in place in the case of a surplus.

Do you have figures for it?

[DemPGH]

If I'm not mistaken, we've approved a lot of infrastructure spending as well.

So how about this?- and then I'm ready for a vote.

You must be logged in to read this quote.

[windjammer]

So I'm glad to see the Midwest and the Pacific can have some exchanges .
My "Chief Justice Amendment" was globally your "Chief Justice Amendment", and I see that this bill looks like the "MW Surplus"

[Sec. of State Superique]

I recommend half for the fund and half for the debt!

[PJ]

If I'm not mistaken, we've approved a lot of infrastructure spending as well.

So how about this?- and then I'm ready for a vote.

You must be logged in to read this quote.

4/5 is still unanimous agreement. I believe that any money put into the surplus should be of unanimous agreement anyway, so amendment is unfriendly.

[PJ]

Lol what surplus?

This is in the case of a surplus honey.

[PJ]

Bump

[DemPGH]

If I'm not mistaken, we've approved a lot of infrastructure spending as well.

So how about this?- and then I'm ready for a vote.

You must be logged in to read this quote.

4/5 is still unanimous agreement. I believe that any money put into the surplus should be of unanimous agreement anyway, so amendment is unfriendly.

No, 4/5 still allows Xahar to not show up. It would be me, Flo, you, and BK. Right?

[PJ]

If I'm not mistaken, we've approved a lot of infrastructure spending as well.

So how about this?- and then I'm ready for a vote.

You must be logged in to read this quote.

4/5 is still unanimous agreement. I believe that any money put into the surplus should be of unanimous agreement anyway, so amendment is unfriendly.

No, 4/5 still allows Xahar to not show up. It would be me, Flo, you, and BK. Right?

Oh yeah, I made a mistake. Amendment is friendly.

[DemPGH]

Okay, final vote on the final text, which contains my amendment above.

yes, No, or Abstain.

I vote YES!

[Хahar 🤔]

No

Prefiero que solamente los legisladores legislan. Sería un conflicto de interés si el Juez participe en el proceso legislativo.

[Sec. of State Superique]

No

Prefiero que solamente los legisladores legislan. Sería un conflicto de interés si el Juez participe en el proceso legislativo.

Nuestra señora, que bueno que tenemos un legislador verdaderamente poliglota!

[Flake]

Aye

[DemPGH]

This passes!

Voting Yes: Councillors DemPGH and Flo
Voting No: Councillor Xahar

[PJ]

X Politics Junkie