Cruz says he's "in between" McCain and Paul on foreign policy
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 03, 2024, 10:48:38 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  Cruz says he's "in between" McCain and Paul on foreign policy
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2
Author Topic: Cruz says he's "in between" McCain and Paul on foreign policy  (Read 2890 times)
Mr. Morden
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,066
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: September 11, 2013, 08:58:51 PM »

http://therun2016.com/cruz-carves-out-distance-from-rand/

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
Logged
Linus Van Pelt
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,145


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: September 11, 2013, 09:39:45 PM »

Who isn't between McCain and Paul on foreign policy?
Logged
H. Ross Peron
General Mung Beans
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,401
Korea, Republic of


Political Matrix
E: -6.58, S: -1.91

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: September 11, 2013, 09:40:39 PM »

In other words, Mr. Cruz like much of the Tea Party probably supports some sort of a "passive-aggressive" foreign policy. Unlike the neocons, Cruz does not even attempt to show any sort of interest in humanitarian intervention or promoting democracy but neither is he genuinely reluctant to go to war like the paleolibertarian Republicans are. Instead Cruz is willing to support any war as long 1) its proposed by a Republican President and 2) decides that it will kill plenty of Moslems and won't help them.
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,646
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: September 11, 2013, 11:44:19 PM »

In other words, Mr. Cruz like much of the Tea Party probably supports some sort of a "passive-aggressive" foreign policy. Unlike the neocons, Cruz does not even attempt to show any sort of interest in humanitarian intervention or promoting democracy but neither is he genuinely reluctant to go to war like the paleolibertarian Republicans are. Instead Cruz is willing to support any war as long 1) its proposed by a Republican President and 2) decides that it will kill plenty of Moslems and won't help them.

This sums things up pretty nicely.
Logged
Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.
Nathan
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 34,536


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: September 11, 2013, 11:51:31 PM »

That's a little like being in between Paul Ryan and Subcomandante Marcos on economics.
Logged
PolitiJunkie
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,124


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: September 12, 2013, 12:03:40 AM »

I'm between God and Satan on religion.

Logged
Landslide Lyndon
px75
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,116
Greece


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: September 12, 2013, 01:44:02 AM »

Playing for both teams won't help you with the Evangelical vote Ted.
Logged
barfbag
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,611
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.26, S: -0.87

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: September 12, 2013, 03:34:48 AM »

Yes but that doesn't tell us much. Foreign policy is a very crucial issue too. I tend to come closest to George Voinovich, Tom Ridge, and Janet Napolitano on foreign policy and homeland security.
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,882


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: September 12, 2013, 03:53:27 AM »

My opinion of the Israeli government is in between Netanyahu and Hitler.
Logged
Bacon King
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,833
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.63, S: -9.49

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: September 12, 2013, 11:34:58 AM »

I came into this topic to make a joke but looks like it's already been made like five times Sad
Logged
Marnetmar
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 495
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.58, S: -8.24

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: September 13, 2013, 10:49:18 AM »

I am somewhere between Terroja Kincaid and Virgil Goode on social issues.
Logged
Maxwell
mah519
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,459
Germany


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: September 13, 2013, 12:23:04 PM »
« Edited: September 13, 2013, 12:33:33 PM by Senator Maxwell »

On a scale of Paul to McCain, I'm a potato.

But this is actually good for a Republican primary: I think whoever is the nominee can't be Rand Paul, but also can't be a neo-con (aka Christie). Therefore, they have to strike some sort of middle ground. Unfortunately, Ted Cruz is the first one to recognize this balancing act.
Logged
Mister Mets
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,440
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: September 13, 2013, 06:01:41 PM »

If Cruz wants to be President in 2016 (and it's possible that he realizes that he's not yet ready) there are some advantages to depicting himself as a reasonable alternative to Rand Paul. The problem is that it's a territory he's sharing with pretty much every other potential Republican nominee.

Two different lists (The Fix and Chasing 2016) have Rand Paul as the Republican frontrunner, and there's a strong case for that if his competition is so divided. Of course, this is all subject to change should Cruz actually gain any foreign policy experience. He's currently a lawyer with less than an year in the legislature.
Logged
old timey villain
cope1989
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,741


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: September 13, 2013, 06:27:50 PM »

Cruz would also be the ugliest president since LBJ.

(both from Texas)
Logged
Consciously Unconscious
Liberty Republican
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,453
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: September 13, 2013, 09:23:16 PM »

Who isn't between McCain and Paul on foreign policy?
Logged
PolitiJunkie
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,124


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: September 14, 2013, 01:01:43 AM »

Cruz would also be the ugliest president since LBJ.

(both from Texas)

Nixon served after LBJ. Easy mistake to make though.
Logged
badgate
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,466


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: September 14, 2013, 01:05:07 AM »

America is somewhere between the north and south pole
Logged
PolitiJunkie
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,124


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: September 14, 2013, 01:06:36 AM »

Chuck Schumer is somewhere in between Kirsten Gillibrand and Andrew Cuomo on being a liberal from New York.
Logged
barfbag
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,611
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.26, S: -0.87

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: September 14, 2013, 02:39:18 PM »

We're all in between Goldwater and Kucinich on foreign policy.
Logged
PolitiJunkie
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,124


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: September 14, 2013, 02:40:59 PM »

We're all in between Goldwater and Kucinich on foreign policy.

Here we go.
Logged
ElectionsGuy
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,102
United States


Political Matrix
E: 7.10, S: -7.65

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: September 14, 2013, 03:09:29 PM »

That's a pretty funny statement to either avoid telling what he actually thinks, or he said it without thinking and it ended up sounded pretty general and stupid.

Its like saying: I'm between Karl Marx and Adam Smith on capitalism.
Logged
barfbag
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,611
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.26, S: -0.87

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: September 14, 2013, 08:05:03 PM »

That's a pretty funny statement to either avoid telling what he actually thinks, or he said it without thinking and it ended up sounded pretty general and stupid.

Its like saying: I'm between Karl Marx and Adam Smith on capitalism.

This thread is getting funny. I'm between Sandra Fluke and Rick Santorum on birth control.
Logged
Mr. Morden
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,066
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: September 19, 2013, 06:01:36 AM »

Btw, on Cruz's place in the foreign policy landscape: Last week, The Hill noted that not just Rubio, but also Cruz, shifted position on Syria after Obama called for airstrikes:

http://thehill.com/video/in-the-news/321237-rubio-cruz-shift-positions-on-military-strikes-in-syria

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
Logged
Maxwell
mah519
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,459
Germany


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: September 19, 2013, 11:17:32 AM »

Chuck Schumer is somewhere in between Kirsten Gillibrand and Andrew Cuomo on being a liberal from New York.

Kirsten Gillibrand was a blue dog until she realized how unpopular it was to be a blue dog.
Logged
PolitiJunkie
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,124


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #24 on: September 19, 2013, 11:36:41 AM »

Chuck Schumer is somewhere in between Kirsten Gillibrand and Andrew Cuomo on being a liberal from New York.

Kirsten Gillibrand was a blue dog until she realized how unpopular it was to be a blue dog.

No. Members of the House are, theoretically, meant to be a delegate who serves on behalf of the interests of their constituency, hence serving/voting as a blue dog from 2007-2008 due to serving a very conservative district. Senators, however, are meant to be more autonomous from the will of the people (though still meant to serve them, of course), hence the 6-year terms and the original stipulation that Senators were appointed by the state legislature rather than elected directly. Incidentally, her constituency is also a whole lot more liberal now, but that's not the sole or main reason for her shift; Gillibrand, unlike most Americans, actually understands and subscribes to the difference in what it means to be a Representative and a Senator and did both of her jobs well. Any attempts by members of either party to categorize her as a Romney-esque flip-flopper will fail to gain traction.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.056 seconds with 14 queries.