AR-Polling Company, Inc: D: Clinton 59% Biden 14%; R: Paul 21% Rubio 17%
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 06:35:25 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
  AR-Polling Company, Inc: D: Clinton 59% Biden 14%; R: Paul 21% Rubio 17%
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: AR-Polling Company, Inc: D: Clinton 59% Biden 14%; R: Paul 21% Rubio 17%  (Read 758 times)
Mr. Morden
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,066
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: August 11, 2013, 07:41:56 AM »
« edited: August 11, 2013, 09:00:17 AM by Mr. Morden »

Polling Company, Inc. did a 2016 presidential primary poll in Arkansas poll for the Washington Free Beacon:

http://freebeacon.com/tom-cotton-in-dead-heat-with-mark-pryor-for-arkansas-senate/

Dems

Clinton 59%
Biden 14%

GOP

Paul 21%
Rubio 17%

They polled other names as well (including Cruz, Jindal, Christie, and Walker on the Republican side), but they say the support of each of those candidates was below 10% each, and they don't bother listing the numbers.
Logged
Mehmentum
Icefire9
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,600
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: August 11, 2013, 12:54:41 PM »

I'm honestly surprised that Clinton isn't higher.
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,492
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: August 12, 2013, 06:39:58 PM »

I'm honestly surprised that Clinton isn't higher.

Same here.
Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,155
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: August 14, 2013, 05:06:55 AM »

Yeah, Clinton should do stronger here I suppose, but remember the small sub-sample of Democrats in this poll (only ca. 200 polled).

So, the MoE is something like 7-8%.
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: August 29, 2013, 08:56:47 PM »

While Clinton crushes her Democratic competition, her advantage narrows significantly when she is placed head-to-head with potential Republican challengers. A Clinton vs. Paul matchup shows the former secretary of state leading 48 percent to 45 percent, within the poll’s margin-of-error. In a face-off between Clinton and Christie, Clinton leads 44 percent to 42.

“Hillary Clinton is a former first lady of the state and the nation who ought to be able to surpass 50 percent in one of her “home” states among relative newcomers,” Conway said. “Arkansans are not yet sold on her, with less than half of them committing to a Hillary candidacy against two very different Republicans, Sen. Rand Paul and Gov. Chris Christie.”


What odd framing. Going from Obama's 24 point loss to a 2-3 point lead sounds like a pretty damn big deal to me, yet they make it seem like it's a bad thing for Hillary.
Logged
Maxwell
mah519
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,459
Germany


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: September 17, 2013, 09:23:44 AM »

While Clinton crushes her Democratic competition, her advantage narrows significantly when she is placed head-to-head with potential Republican challengers. A Clinton vs. Paul matchup shows the former secretary of state leading 48 percent to 45 percent, within the poll’s margin-of-error. In a face-off between Clinton and Christie, Clinton leads 44 percent to 42.

“Hillary Clinton is a former first lady of the state and the nation who ought to be able to surpass 50 percent in one of her “home” states among relative newcomers,” Conway said. “Arkansans are not yet sold on her, with less than half of them committing to a Hillary candidacy against two very different Republicans, Sen. Rand Paul and Gov. Chris Christie.”


What odd framing. Going from Obama's 24 point loss to a 2-3 point lead sounds like a pretty damn big deal to me, yet they make it seem like it's a bad thing for Hillary.

Obama was so much the wrong candidate for Arkansas, where Clinton checks a lot of the right boxes of Arkansas.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.034 seconds with 13 queries.