Northeast Colorado counties begin effort to secede and become 'North Colorado'
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 22, 2024, 10:31:30 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Geography & Demographics (Moderators: muon2, 100% pro-life no matter what)
  Northeast Colorado counties begin effort to secede and become 'North Colorado'
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 3
Author Topic: Northeast Colorado counties begin effort to secede and become 'North Colorado'  (Read 28582 times)
Joe Republic
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 40,218
Ukraine


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: June 07, 2013, 01:33:49 AM »

Quote from: Restricted
You must be logged in to read this quote.

The article goes into more detail on their concerns.  Anyway, expect this to go nowhere of course.  I still find efforts to redraw the map interesting, however.


Logged
Joe Republic
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 40,218
Ukraine


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: June 07, 2013, 01:35:50 AM »

The article also helpfully lists some of the other failed attempts across the country.  I really didn't realize it was quite this frequent.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,976


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: June 07, 2013, 02:33:28 AM »

Californians always have bad timing for for their succession efforts.

California voted to split in two in 1859.
The State of Jefferson was proclaimed on November 27, 1941.
Logged
muon2
Moderator
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,836


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: June 07, 2013, 06:03:08 AM »

The article also helpfully lists some of the other failed attempts across the country.  I really didn't realize it was quite this frequent.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

The CO counties could join with the NE panhandle and both go to WY. That would at least bring the areas over the population for a CD. Tongue
Logged
Brittain33
brittain33
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,102


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: June 07, 2013, 06:56:20 PM »

Wait, a committee in Martha's Vineyard organized to have Nantucket secede from Massachusetts? LOL.
Logged
True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)
Ernest
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 42,144
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: June 07, 2013, 08:52:58 PM »

I could even see a West Colorado consisting of Colorado west of the Continental Divide being accepted as independent State.  It's smaller than 1/435 of the US apportionment population but larger than Wyoming.

As for northeast Colorado, the population of the proposed area is just way too small for a State. I could see Congress potentially accepting a smaller chunk of northeast Colorado joining Nebraska to fill in the angle, or even slicing off all of Colorado east of the Wyoming/Nebraska border and attaching to to Nebraska or Kansas depending on whether it was north or south of the Nebraska/Kansas border.  Those are fairly low population heavily Republican areas that might well be more comfortable politically in the States to their east than in a Democratic-trending Colorado.

Even if east and west Colorado as defined were taken away from Colorado, Colorado would only lose 1 CD.  West Colorado would have 1 CD, and Nebraska and Kansas would be unchanged, but less likely to lose CDs in future censuses.
Logged
Kevinstat
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,825


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: June 07, 2013, 11:36:47 PM »

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
The new proposed state would have been more than just Aroostook County.  The Legislator who used to submit those bills is Henry Joy, who served from 1992 to 2000 and 2002 to 2010.  He ran for Governor in 1998 as the conservative "movement" candidate, and finished a distant second to former Congressman Jim Longley, Jr., son of Maine's first Independent Governor.  What he said he wanted as the new state was often less than what was in the drafted bill, but I'm sure it was more than just Aroostook County.  I'll have to find versions of that bill online tomorrow and post the links here.  Proposed names for the new state included Acadia but also Maine, with the rest of Maine to be named "Northern Massachusetts" (I'm not kidding).

He used to also put in Constitutional resolutions to have 2 Senators per County.  I actually spoke against that in 2005, when I was woefully underemployed and had time to go to a hearing and get try to some digs in against a politician I had never met but had grown to rather intensely dislike, not so much because of anything he did but for the reverence a lot of people on a conservative web site I frequented held for him even though the manner of thinking that came across to me from reading testimony of his seemed rather base.  I asked what was more rural, Bath or Patten.  Bath, home of Bath Iron Works, is in Sagadahoc county which has well less than 1/32nd of Maine's population but would have 2 of Maine's 32 Senators under this plan, while the town of Patten, which was in Henry Joy's district, is in Penobscot County which had a little less than twice the average population for a county in Maine and would have lost representation under that constitutional amendment (if it wasn't promptly struck down in federal court which it would be).  I tried to focus my arguements on policy and basic fairness rather than constitutionality, as I know how irritating it is to hear "you can't do that, na na na na na na" (well, one's not likely to here that exactly in adult conversation, but something that basically comes across as that).
Logged
politicallefty
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,354
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -3.87, S: -9.22

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: June 08, 2013, 04:15:24 AM »

» California: One of the most common places for threats of secession. Most recently, conservative counties proposed a Southern California.

SoCal conservatives tried to gerrymander their own state:



The plan would've backfired in 2012, as Obama carried it (though less than 2008). It would've been a solidly Republican state for Bush, though.

Conservatives seems to have their own conception of Southern California, which just so happens to exclude Los Angeles County.
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,976


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: June 08, 2013, 04:36:54 AM »

» California: One of the most common places for threats of secession. Most recently, conservative counties proposed a Southern California.

SoCal conservatives tried to gerrymander their own state:



The plan would've backfired in 2012, as Obama carried it (though less than 2008). It would've been a solidly Republican state for Bush, though.

Conservatives seems to have their own conception of Southern California, which just so happens to exclude Los Angeles County.

LOL, Mono county isn't particularly Republican these days. Anyways, I think they also had an idea to just have 5 counties, San Bernardino, and the 4 south of it, which would make less absurd shape for a state.
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: June 08, 2013, 12:54:16 PM »

Quote from: Restricted
You must be logged in to read this quote.
Of course, as long as they took Weld with them, nothing would change on that front. It has more than three-quarters of the population of this 'state'.
Logged
Nhoj
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,224
United States


Political Matrix
E: 2.52, S: -7.74

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: June 08, 2013, 01:28:12 PM »

Quote from: Restricted
You must be logged in to read this quote.
Of course, as long as they took Weld with them, nothing would change on that front. It has more than three-quarters of the population of this 'state'.
Yeah weld county isn't what I would call particularly rural either.
Logged
Fuzzybigfoot
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,211
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: June 08, 2013, 11:01:09 PM »

Endorsed
Logged
Kevinstat
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,825


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: June 08, 2013, 11:06:04 PM »

To make it clear who said what (although it can be funny when this happens and goes through several quotes):

Quote from: Restricted
You must be logged in to read this quote.
Of course, as long as they took Weld with them, nothing would change on that front. It has more than three-quarters of the population of this 'state'.
Yeah weld county isn't what I would call particularly rural either.
Logged
DINGO Joe
dingojoe
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,689
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: June 08, 2013, 11:34:12 PM »

Yes, every 350,000 people should have their own state.  Let's have 1000 states and 2000 senators.  Since it's all fantasy, let's go Games of Thrones on these attention whores and put their heads on a pike.
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: June 09, 2013, 06:08:24 AM »

330,000.
Logged
Bandit3 the Worker
Populist3
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,965


Political Matrix
E: -10.00, S: -9.92

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: June 09, 2013, 09:57:43 AM »

It's just some right-wing crybabies throwing a tantrum.
Logged
5280
MagneticFree
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,404
United States


Political Matrix
E: 6.97, S: -0.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: July 02, 2013, 09:08:35 PM »

The pan handle of Nebraska is interested joining North Colorado now.
Logged
Bandit3 the Worker
Populist3
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,965


Political Matrix
E: -10.00, S: -9.92

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: July 02, 2013, 09:10:20 PM »

The pan handle of Nebraska is interested joining North Colorado now.

How about if northeastern Colorado just joins Nebraska?
Logged
Joe Republic
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 40,218
Ukraine


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: November 04, 2013, 06:32:59 PM »

The counties will vote on secession tomorrow.

Since this was first reported, more counties have joined in and one dropped out, so this what the weird-looking new state would look like:

Logged
The Free North
CTRattlesnake
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,569
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: November 04, 2013, 08:08:20 PM »

The counties will vote on secession tomorrow.

Since this was first reported, more counties have joined in and one dropped out, so this what the weird-looking new state would look like:



Love it
Logged
Sol
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,303
Bosnia and Herzegovina


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: November 04, 2013, 08:40:35 PM »

The counties will vote on secession tomorrow.

Since this was first reported, more counties have joined in and one dropped out, so this what the weird-looking new state would look like:



Love it
LOL at the noncontiguity.
Logged
Bandit3 the Worker
Populist3
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,965


Political Matrix
E: -10.00, S: -9.92

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: November 04, 2013, 08:41:10 PM »

Does this have a chance of prevailing in any county?
Logged
Indy Texas 🇺🇦🇵🇸
independentTX
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,284
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.52, S: -3.48

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: November 04, 2013, 09:41:58 PM »

If those counties were to become a separate state in their own right, they would almost certainly become net-recipients of federal funding since their own tax base couldn't support the fixed costs of running a state.

If they want to secede, they should be required to prove to Congress that they can pay for a minimum level of state services without federal help before they can be allowed to join the Union as a 51st state.

Either way, it sets a very bad precedent and if it works it could touch off a land rush of sorts for every state's various interest groups to try to carve off portions of their states for themselves.
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: November 05, 2013, 01:47:21 PM »

If those counties were to become a separate state in their own right, they would almost certainly become net-recipients of federal funding since their own tax base couldn't support the fixed costs of running a state.

If they want to secede, they should be required to prove to Congress that they can pay for a minimum level of state services without federal help before they can be allowed to join the Union as a 51st state.

Either way, it sets a very bad precedent and if it works it could touch off a land rush of sorts for every state's various interest groups to try to carve off portions of their states for themselves.
How about letting them secede, then not admitting them as a state? The Territory of North Colorado? How's it sound?
Logged
Indy Texas 🇺🇦🇵🇸
independentTX
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,284
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.52, S: -3.48

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #24 on: November 05, 2013, 11:44:50 PM »

If those counties were to become a separate state in their own right, they would almost certainly become net-recipients of federal funding since their own tax base couldn't support the fixed costs of running a state.

If they want to secede, they should be required to prove to Congress that they can pay for a minimum level of state services without federal help before they can be allowed to join the Union as a 51st state.

Either way, it sets a very bad precedent and if it works it could touch off a land rush of sorts for every state's various interest groups to try to carve off portions of their states for themselves.
How about letting them secede, then not admitting them as a state? The Territory of North Colorado? How's it sound?

Then they would be represented by one non-voting delegate in Congress just like all those little islands in the Pacific no one knows or cares about.

I'm opposed to the US having territories of any kind. We need to follow the precedent of European countries in either cutting their imperial possessions loose altogether or fully integrating them into the mother country, as France did with French Guiana and the Netherlands has done with its Caribbean exclaves.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2 3  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.069 seconds with 12 queries.