Illinois Redistricting Amendment Campaign
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 29, 2024, 03:25:03 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Geography & Demographics (Moderators: muon2, 100% pro-life no matter what)
  Illinois Redistricting Amendment Campaign
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2
Author Topic: Illinois Redistricting Amendment Campaign  (Read 2101 times)
muon2
Moderator
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,793


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: May 17, 2013, 08:46:09 AM »

A new initiative to put a constitutional amendment on the 2014 ballot was announced this week. It is somewhat similar to the CA process and the summary of the proposal with a link to the draft text is here.

The coalition is looking for comments before finalizing the language for the petitions. I know there are plenty of posters here who could bring some useful comments forward. I'd be happy to see that comments on the draft get to the coalition.
Logged
krazen1211
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,372


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: May 17, 2013, 10:27:04 AM »

Excellent.
Logged
Sbane
sbane
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,309


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: May 17, 2013, 10:30:11 AM »

Why isn't this being proposed in Ohio or Texas? Democrats are such pussies.
Logged
Gass3268
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,527
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: May 17, 2013, 10:33:12 AM »
« Edited: May 17, 2013, 10:37:17 AM by Gass3268 »

I hope this fails. Unless you can get a Republican state, like Pennsylvania, to do this as well. Democrats only have a few states were they cane even out the unbalance of Michigan, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania and Texas. Why should we have to unilaterally disarm in one of the few states were we have some power. Hopefully they don't get the signatures and in the worst case the Democrats are able to mobilize their base to vote against. Use the same campaign techniques that Republicans used in Ohio to defeat their non-partisan redistricting proposal. Say this takes away the power of their elected representatives.       

Really there needs to be Federal action on gerrymandering.
Logged
ilikeverin
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,409
Timor-Leste


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: May 17, 2013, 10:53:45 AM »

Good for you, Illinois!  One thing I've always wondered about: is "Republicans" and "Democrats" actually specified in these sorts of amendments, or is it just "members of major parties" (which right now happen to be Republicans and Democrats)?
Logged
krazen1211
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,372


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: May 17, 2013, 11:05:48 AM »

Why isn't this being proposed in Ohio or Texas? Democrats are such pussies.

It was in Ohio. The people said no.
Logged
Gass3268
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,527
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: May 17, 2013, 11:13:47 AM »

Why isn't this being proposed in Ohio or Texas? Democrats are such pussies.

It was in Ohio. The people said no.

Hopefully the people of Illinois say no too!
Logged
Sol
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,135
Bosnia and Herzegovina


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: May 17, 2013, 11:16:20 AM »

All the Democrats complaining here are being huge hypocrites. I'd rather have a huge GOP house majority with more Nonpartisan redistricting in left-wing states.
Logged
Gass3268
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,527
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: May 17, 2013, 11:19:05 AM »

All the Democrats complaining here are being huge hypocrites. I'd rather have a huge GOP house majority with more Nonpartisan redistricting in left-wing states.

Unilaterally disarming is stupid and counterproductive. Like I said, the only way to deal with this is on the Federal level.   
Logged
muon2
Moderator
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,793


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: May 17, 2013, 11:40:56 AM »

All the Democrats complaining here are being huge hypocrites. I'd rather have a huge GOP house majority with more Nonpartisan redistricting in left-wing states.

Unilaterally disarming is stupid and counterproductive. Like I said, the only way to deal with this is on the Federal level.   

Redistricting reform didn't hurt the Dems control in CA, and IL has a similar partisan make up. This proposal here is only for the state legislature so the feds can't intervene. Of course other states should do the same and I worked in favor of the OH amendment that failed.
Logged
Sbane
sbane
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,309


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: May 17, 2013, 11:43:18 AM »

Why isn't this being proposed in Ohio or Texas? Democrats are such pussies.

It was in Ohio. The people said no.

So I assume you were in favor of it, considering you are in favor of it in Illinois?
Logged
krazen1211
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,372


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: May 17, 2013, 11:44:38 AM »

Why isn't this being proposed in Ohio or Texas? Democrats are such pussies.

It was in Ohio. The people said no.

So I assume you were in favor of it, considering you are in favor of it in Illinois?

In favor of the campaign? Sure.
Logged
Sbane
sbane
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,309


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: May 17, 2013, 11:46:43 AM »

Why isn't this being proposed in Ohio or Texas? Democrats are such pussies.

It was in Ohio. The people said no.

So I assume you were in favor of it, considering you are in favor of it in Illinois?

In favor of the campaign? Sure.

So you want non-partisan redistricting in both Ohio and Illinois?
Logged
Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee
North Carolina Yankee
Moderators
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 54,118
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: May 17, 2013, 11:48:53 AM »

Gerrymandering isn't an ICBM with which you can engage in in Mutually Assured Destruction. It is a corruption of the system and it degrades the quality of the politicians into useless bots, hacks and extremists. People of all parties are better off with as many states having a better process as possible.

All the Democrats complaining here are being huge hypocrites. I'd rather have a huge GOP house majority with more Nonpartisan redistricting in left-wing states.

Unilaterally disarming is stupid and counterproductive. Like I said, the only way to deal with this is on the Federal level.   

There are only a handfull of states that have a problem, most of them are big and/or swing states. Many states already have solid systems in place and having the House dictate this is a bad precedent and could lead to a future majority actually requiring that it be done by state legislatures if they feel it is in their partisan advantage to do so. As for a Constitutional Amendment, it would be harder to get that than to do it state by state.
Logged
krazen1211
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,372


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: May 17, 2013, 11:53:42 AM »

Why isn't this being proposed in Ohio or Texas? Democrats are such pussies.

It was in Ohio. The people said no.

So I assume you were in favor of it, considering you are in favor of it in Illinois?

In favor of the campaign? Sure.

So you want non-partisan redistricting in both Ohio and Illinois?


That is for the people to decide. That said, this legislation does create a nicer set of standards for redistricting. Michigan already has the same.
Logged
krazen1211
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,372


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: May 17, 2013, 11:56:48 AM »

All the Democrats complaining here are being huge hypocrites. I'd rather have a huge GOP house majority with more Nonpartisan redistricting in left-wing states.

The amendment would not affect Illinois’s Congressional district or local maps.
Logged
DrScholl
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,148
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.55, S: -3.30

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: May 17, 2013, 12:11:38 PM »

It needs to fail, Republicans can't draw ridiculous districts in blue states and also expect fair districts in others that they don't control. When Republicans considering changing maps in Michigan, Ohio and Pennsylvania, then they can argue for changes to rules elsewhere, otherwise, it's hypocritical.
Logged
ilikeverin
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,409
Timor-Leste


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: May 17, 2013, 12:14:22 PM »

...some days partisanship makes me cry Sad
Logged
Sol
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,135
Bosnia and Herzegovina


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: May 17, 2013, 12:42:43 PM »

All the Democrats complaining here are being huge hypocrites. I'd rather have a huge GOP house majority with more Nonpartisan redistricting in left-wing states.

The amendment would not affect Illinois’s Congressional district or local maps.
I meant for the 2020 redistricting round.

Also, having nonpartisan redistricting could even benefit Ds in the future. If a realignment happens, it could ensure that we still get a fair number of districts.
Logged
muon2
Moderator
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,793


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: May 17, 2013, 12:45:18 PM »

...some days partisanship makes me cry Sad

That's so true with gerrymandering - it was created precisely to cement partisan control and for no other purpose. It worked that first time in 1812 for the MA Senate, and it's been a feature in the US since.
Logged
Gass3268
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,527
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: May 17, 2013, 01:01:48 PM »

All the Democrats complaining here are being huge hypocrites. I'd rather have a huge GOP house majority with more Nonpartisan redistricting in left-wing states.

Unilaterally disarming is stupid and counterproductive. Like I said, the only way to deal with this is on the Federal level.   

Redistricting reform didn't hurt the Dems control in CA, and IL has a similar partisan make up. This proposal here is only for the state legislature so the feds can't intervene. Of course other states should do the same and I worked in favor of the OH amendment that failed.

Oh, I must have missed that. I'm cool with it now.
Logged
greenforest32
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,625


Political Matrix
E: -7.94, S: -8.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: May 17, 2013, 10:45:25 PM »

Needs to be done federally.


http://ballotpedia.org/wiki/index.php/States_with_initiative_or_referendum

Logged
muon2
Moderator
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,793


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: May 17, 2013, 11:02:49 PM »


The feds could only legislate redistricting for Congressional districts. This is about state legislative districts.
Logged
greenforest32
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,625


Political Matrix
E: -7.94, S: -8.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: May 17, 2013, 11:10:50 PM »

The feds could only legislate redistricting for Congressional districts. This is about state legislative districts.

I'm thinking of a federal court decision as well, which I do realize is highly unlikely at the moment.
Logged
Mr. Illini
liberty142
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,843
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.26, S: -3.30

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #24 on: May 20, 2013, 01:19:56 AM »

Why isn't this being proposed in Ohio or Texas? Democrats are such pussies.

It was in Ohio. The people said no.

Hopefully the people of Illinois say no too!

I say "Yes!" Smiley
Logged
Pages: [1] 2  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.057 seconds with 11 queries.