Election 2012: Obama 61.1% Romney 37.2% Map with no uniform swing?

[old timey villain]

In this scenario, Obama wins in an historic landslide, managing to secure 61.1% of the vote against Mitt Romney who manages a paltry 37.2% - each candidate doing 10 points better and worse than IRL. How does the electoral map look without a uniform 10% swing from the actual electoral map? In which states does he improve greatly from his actual performance and which does he hit a ceiling?

So for example:

New Hampshire: Obama 51.98/Romney 46.4------>Obama 61.98/Romney 36.4
Mississippi: Romney 55.29/ Obama 43.79----->Obama 53.79/Romney 45.29

Without Uniform swing:

New Hampshire: Obama 51.98/Romney 46.4----->Obama 66%/Romney 32%
Mississippi: Romney 55.29/Obama 43.79-----> Romney 51%/Obama 48%

My feeling is that New Hampshire is more elastic than Mississippi, so Obama improves greatly in some states while stalling out in inelastic ones.

Discuss with maps!

[Skill and Chance]

It would depend on the reason for Romney's collapse.  Does he collapse with fis-cons or with so-cons?  The most plausible scenario for an Obama landslide to me would be that Romney makes a full embrace of the Akin comments and the bottom falls out for him in the fis-con suburbs.  My map of this would be:

It would be more like the Johnson landslide than FDR or Nixon.  Most of the national swing is driven by very high Obama margins in CA-IL-NY.  VA would fall behind the national margin in a landslide and NH would zoom above it.  I just don't see the interior South voting for Obama under any circumstances. 

[H.E. VOLODYMYR ZELENKSYY]

I'm lazy, so I did a uniform 10% swing in each state.