Muhaha, Canadians
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 29, 2024, 08:26:46 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Forum Community
  Forum Community (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, YE, KoopaDaQuick 🇵🇸)
  Muhaha, Canadians
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Muhaha, Canadians  (Read 296 times)
MASHED POTATOES. VOTE!
Kalwejt
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 57,380


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: December 31, 2012, 06:02:43 PM »

You're still behing, stuck in 2012.
Logged
Queen Mum Inks.LWC
Inks.LWC
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,011
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.65, S: -2.78

P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: December 31, 2012, 06:04:57 PM »

I see somebody's been enjoying the New Year's Eve drinky drink...
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,178
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: December 31, 2012, 06:12:14 PM »


See where Harper's reactionary policies led them! Shocked
Logged
True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)
Ernest
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 42,144
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: December 31, 2012, 06:28:55 PM »
« Edited: December 31, 2012, 06:44:13 PM by True Federalist »

As resident of South Carolina, I must say it is better to be stuck in 2012 than in 1912.
Logged
Simfan34
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,744
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.90, S: 4.17

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: December 31, 2012, 06:31:19 PM »

As resident of South Carolina, I must say it is better to be stick in 2012 than in 1912.

Nah, and Canadians only.
Logged
Franzl
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,254
Germany


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: December 31, 2012, 06:35:08 PM »

Haha. I'm part of the 2013 gang!
Logged
MASHED POTATOES. VOTE!
Kalwejt
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 57,380


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: December 31, 2012, 06:46:06 PM »

As resident of South Carolina, I must say it is better to be stuck in 2012 than in 1912.

At least you had Senators that were not afraid to stick their pitchforks in the President's rump back then.
Logged
Hash
Hashemite
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,409
Colombia


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: December 31, 2012, 07:08:28 PM »


See where Harper's reactionary policies led them! Shocked

Yeah, Harper is keeping us in the past. In fact, we're not going to 2013 at midnight - we're going back to 1913! Smiley
Logged
True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)
Ernest
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 42,144
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: December 31, 2012, 09:08:16 PM »

As resident of South Carolina, I must say it is better to be stuck in 2012 than in 1912.

At least you had Senators that were not afraid to stick their pitchforks in the President's rump back then.

Considering how big and juicy a target Taft's rump was, can you blame Tillman?  Altho to be fair it was Cleveland's rump in 1896 he got the nickname for.  By 1912 Old Ben had moved on to the Navy and its irritating habit of not only increasing its funding requests for new ships each year, but also building ships larger and costlier than what Congress has originally authorized.  He asked the Navy to come up with designs for "maximum battleships", that is the largest practical battleship the Navy could possibly put to use.  He repeated the request in 1916 and got designs that the Navy never intended to use, but which did influence the design of the South Dakota class that later got scrapped because of the Washington Naval Treaty. The ships would have been the size of the post WW II supercarriers, which isn't surprising since they were subject to the same basic design limitation, that the ship needed to be able to make it through the Panama Canal.   A number of different designs were considered.  One of them had fifteen 18" guns, another had 24 16" guns.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.032 seconds with 12 queries.