Why are so many California Congresspeople so old?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 21, 2024, 03:45:12 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  Why are so many California Congresspeople so old?
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Why are so many California Congresspeople so old?  (Read 1103 times)
Zioneer
PioneerProgress
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,451
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: December 09, 2012, 09:15:05 PM »

So I've been checking on Wikipedia, and I never realized that both of California's senators are in their 70s, and that many/most of their Congresspeople are at least 60, if not 70. Why are California politicians much older than most of their Congressional colleagues?
Logged
freepcrusher
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,833
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: December 09, 2012, 10:03:59 PM »

California politics is machine oriented and a lot of the candidates go back to the 70s and 80s. Waxman Miller and Pelosi were the products of the Burton machine and some of the other congressmen are products of the Waxman-Berman machine.
Logged
Zioneer
PioneerProgress
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,451
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: December 09, 2012, 10:46:16 PM »

California politics is machine oriented and a lot of the candidates go back to the 70s and 80s. Waxman Miller and Pelosi were the products of the Burton machine and some of the other congressmen are products of the Waxman-Berman machine.

So the current "machine" is the Waxman-Berman machine, then? How does it operate?

Also, how can I tell what kind of machine (in either party) my state has? Does Utah even have a political machine? Or is there a different term for the Utah version?
Logged
badgate
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,466


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: December 09, 2012, 11:28:31 PM »

Where is the machine housed? Is it a dangerous machine if it gets out of hand? Does it take diesel or unleaded?
Logged
bgwah
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,833
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.03, S: -6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: December 10, 2012, 12:13:50 AM »

From what I understand, until 2010 California's redistricting system resulted in rather extreme pro-incumbent gerrymanders.
Logged
DINGO Joe
dingojoe
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,689
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: December 10, 2012, 12:20:51 AM »

Probably simple math.  Every state has one governor and two senators.  If a state has 4 or 10 congressman the risk/reward for moving up is much greater than in a state with 50+.  Plus California has done nothing but add Congressmen, states that shrink has Congressmen go up against each other (although Sherman-Berman would be an exception to that.
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: December 10, 2012, 04:41:54 AM »

California added just one seat (2%) in 2000 and drew an extremely effective incumbent protection map that year. There also hasn't been a change in Senate representation since 1992; only Iowa's junior senator is even less junior IIRC. Nor is it particularly feasible to run for Governor from the US House in California. So most of these people had been in lifetime jobs for the past 12 to 20 years, sometimes more in naturally safe seats, until the 2012 remap shook things up.
Logged
adma
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,750
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: December 10, 2012, 07:52:18 AM »

And, California being California, a lot of them are "younger at heart" than the norm, I suppose...
Logged
justfollowingtheelections
unempprof
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,766


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: December 10, 2012, 03:33:12 PM »

Unlike congresspeople in other states, Californians can't get promoted because the state only has 2 senators.  They're also very polarized with the Bay and SoCal being very Democratic and the more sparsely populated (as well as a few suburban areas) being very Republican, which means that you it's unlikely a district will end up being competitive at some point.  The people elected therefore keep their seat forever unless someone from their own party challenges them.
Logged
sg0508
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,061
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: December 10, 2012, 11:55:58 PM »

Gerrymandering.
Logged
pbrower2a
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,849
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: December 15, 2012, 04:01:19 PM »

So I've been checking on Wikipedia, and I never realized that both of California's senators are in their 70s, and that many/most of their Congresspeople are at least 60, if not 70. Why are California politicians much older than most of their Congressional colleagues?

Safe seats. Most of the wealth in California is real estate bought cheaply a long time ago or either sold dearly long ago or still owned and being leased dearly. Proposition 13, which keeps tax rates low for any long-term holding of real estate, favors real estate over just about anyone else. The elderly have the wealth and the young are far poorer.
Logged
Napoleon
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,892


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: December 15, 2012, 04:47:57 PM »

Having hyper-restrictive term limits in the state legislature doesn't help Congressional elections become more competitive either. California's political diversity is restrained by geography.
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: December 16, 2012, 06:55:42 AM »

Having hyper-restrictive term limits in the state legislature doesn't help Congressional elections become more competitive either.
Oh yes. Good point.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.039 seconds with 11 queries.