Beckel – Obamas’ end of term will have fewer food stamp recipients
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 29, 2024, 06:39:05 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Beckel – Obamas’ end of term will have fewer food stamp recipients
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: why?
#1
(A) Obama –“Sorry Suckers
 
#2
(B) Republican's fault
 
#3
(C) Commerce refuses to pay
 
#4
(D) Prosperity prevails
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 12

Author Topic: Beckel – Obamas’ end of term will have fewer food stamp recipients  (Read 597 times)
t_host1
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 820


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: November 13, 2012, 03:45:06 PM »

Bob Beckel, the left wing of Fox News, who knew for sure that Barrack Hussein Obama would be re-elected as president, also says, that food stamp distribution will be reduced at the end of this 4year term. What best describes this great accomplishment for Barrack Hussein Obama.

Obama –“Sorry Suckers! No more change”.
 
Republican fault; won’t let illegal’s pay your bills.

Commerce refuses to pay- economic rebellion. Mainstream media, the government and the people blame the Baggers of TEA, as media revenue declines 75%. Begins PSA’s for contributions campaign, insisting with their slogan, “the people must continue to be told the truth”.

Prosperity prevails, self-sustaining liberalism prevails as promised.
Logged
Sound + Vision
Rookie
**
Posts: 39
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.00, S: -4.97

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: November 13, 2012, 06:05:22 PM »

I don't know what you just said, but I really like the term "Baggers of TEA". I might just have to use that.
Logged
t_host1
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 820


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: November 14, 2012, 08:38:18 AM »

I don't know what you just said, but I really like the term "Baggers of TEA". I might just have to use that.
Me translator of incoming query’s is set on open mind, occasionally, rendering the ‘echo; has its challenges. Glad you could make some use of it as I have yet been able to place the most likely answer to the above question, hence, the reason to seek the answer here at Atlas.   
Logged
🐒Gods of Prosperity🔱🐲💸
shua
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 25,689
Nepal


Political Matrix
E: 1.29, S: -0.70

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: November 14, 2012, 02:54:30 PM »

I think Beckel just means that 4 years from now the economy and employment will have recovered enough so that there are fewer people who are poor enough to qualify for food stamps.  That seems likely enough, but there's no way to know for sure at this point. 
Logged
bgwah
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,833
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.03, S: -6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: November 14, 2012, 02:57:21 PM »

I don't know what you just said, but I really like the term "Baggers of TEA". I might just have to use that.
Me translator of incoming query’s is set on open mind, occasionally, rendering the ‘echo; has its challenges. Glad you could make some use of it as I have yet been able to place the most likely answer to the above question, hence, the reason to seek the answer here at Atlas.   

I love this guy.
Logged
RI
realisticidealist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,780


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: 2.61

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: November 14, 2012, 04:51:10 PM »

Food stamps are an automatic stabilizer. If the economy improves, the number of people on food stamps decreases. Simple as that.
Logged
t_host1
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 820


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: November 14, 2012, 10:02:36 PM »

I think Beckel just means that 4 years from now the economy and employment will have recovered enough so that there are fewer people who are poor enough to qualify for food stamps.  That seems likely enough, but there's no way to know for sure at this point. 

Correct, the next 4, it was a closing comment he made in a mild conversation with that Eric guy.

BTW - What do you think the odds are that Obama Insiders shorted the market previous to, today.
Logged
t_host1
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 820


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: November 27, 2012, 12:15:45 AM »


 I would of thought republicans would of been blamed. It looks like history will be made again -  self-sustaining liberalism prevailing.
 I suppose that, if, the percentages of food stamps recipients is down to the invoke-ture of the 12 - 15M illegals being made legal, the finding here at Atlas would still be correct - good job.
Logged
hopper
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,414
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: November 27, 2012, 12:43:28 PM »

Well I guess there is nowhere for food stamp usage but to go down!
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.03 seconds with 13 queries.