PPP NC: Tied. (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 12:00:45 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2012 Elections
  2012 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
  PPP NC: Tied. (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: PPP NC: Tied.  (Read 5156 times)
krazen1211
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,372


« on: October 25, 2012, 03:32:18 PM »

No way this can be true, J.J. told me NC was gone for Obama.

It isn't.  D turnout is running well behind 2008.  In theory, Obama could be tied in early voting, but that would be a disaster for him.


Who needs facts?
Logged
krazen1211
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,372


« Reply #1 on: October 25, 2012, 03:39:09 PM »

No way this can be true, J.J. told me NC was gone for Obama.

It isn't.  D turnout is running well behind 2008.  In theory, Obama could be tied in early voting, but that would be a disaster for him.


Who needs facts?

I don't think you have any right to discuss what other people need....


It's really funny to see people like you ignore what's actually happening on the ground when your own obama fellow tells people to look at whats actually happening on the ground.
Logged
krazen1211
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,372


« Reply #2 on: October 25, 2012, 03:45:25 PM »

No way this can be true, J.J. told me NC was gone for Obama.

It isn't.  D turnout is running well behind 2008.  In theory, Obama could be tied in early voting, but that would be a disaster for him.


Who needs facts?

I don't think you have any right to discuss what other people need....


It's really funny to see people like you ignore what's actually happening on the ground when your own obama fellow tells people to look at whats actually happening on the ground.

Oh, you mean like how Obama has a massive advantage in campaign offices & GOtV?

No, I mean exactly what JJ said just above. Can you read?
Logged
krazen1211
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,372


« Reply #3 on: October 25, 2012, 03:52:29 PM »

No way this can be true, J.J. told me NC was gone for Obama.

It isn't.  D turnout is running well behind 2008.  In theory, Obama could be tied in early voting, but that would be a disaster for him.


Who needs facts?

I don't think you have any right to discuss what other people need....


It's really funny to see people like you ignore what's actually happening on the ground when your own obama fellow tells people to look at whats actually happening on the ground.

Oh, you mean like how Obama has a massive advantage in campaign offices & GOtV?

No, I mean exactly what JJ said just above. Can you read?

I was assuming (wrongly, apparently) that you had some fragile connection to reality. Now, the question is: can you read? ↓

No way this can be true, J.J. told me NC was gone for Obama.

It isn't.  D turnout is running well behind 2008.  In theory, Obama could be tied in early voting, but that would be a disaster for him.

No, the poll says he's up 15% in early voting.

He would have to be winning roughly all the D vote and 2/3 of the NP vote.  Outlier possibly, or a really bad weighting. 

Current NC Early Vote Party Reg   
Dem   50.7%
Rep   30.5%
None/Oth   18.8%

From that, it looks like he just needs to be winning about half of independents and 85% of Democrats, which is reasonable.


Yes, I can. Obviously, you cannot, because if you did, you would know that early voting was 57% D this time 4 years ago.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.044 seconds with 14 queries.