Go through your posting history and find a gem of ignorance from positions on which you have evolved. Seeing as many have been here upwards of 10 years, it should be interesting.
It's Kerry all the way. You guys might as well give-up. Edwards proved to be a regional candidate. His campaign is dead unless some HUGE scandal rocks the Kerry campaign. Even if one did, the media wouldn't report it anyway, until Kerry was assured the nomination. Edwards turned-out ot not have the appeal that even I thought he would have after Iowa. It happens. He didn't carry Viginina and Tennessee, so he is finished. I'm no happier about that than you guys are, believe me.
No, I don't think he's a regional canidate at all, he just had to fight a VERY uphill battle.
1. Kerry has been a Senator for many years, and is more well known.
2. He got all the media attention after his Iowa/NH wins, and the frontrunner status.
Do you know how many people say "I'd vote Edwards, but I want Bush out, so I'm voting Kerry"? That flawed logic. Edwards seems like a much stronger canidate. That just tells me that Kerry is alot of hype and little substance. I wouldn't vote for Bush over Kerry, but I'd be reluctant to push the button next to Kerry's name.
This is a wonderful tidbit from my apesh*t for Edwards days back in 2004. This would be me singing his praises while suggesting that voting for Kerry over Bush would be something I'd have to do reluctantly.
good god...
