Animal-Human Hybrids Spark Controversy
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 29, 2024, 07:23:42 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Debate (Moderator: Torie)
  Animal-Human Hybrids Spark Controversy
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Do you support the proposed ban?
#1
Yes
 
#2
No
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 24

Author Topic: Animal-Human Hybrids Spark Controversy  (Read 1078 times)
A18
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,794
Political Matrix
E: 9.23, S: -6.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: January 27, 2005, 03:45:07 PM »

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2005/01/0125_050125_chimeras.html
Logged
David S
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,250


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: January 27, 2005, 04:12:35 PM »

Mainly I would be concerned about creating a creature which has human intelligence, but which is not human. Would that creature be considered a "person" with constitutional rights? Would it have to pay taxes and social security? Aside from the legal tangles perhaps the worst mess would be the nightmarish existence of creature with human intelligence trapped in the body of a pig or a dog or some other animal. That kind of thing probably should be banned. But on the other hand a pig with human genes from a person who needs a heart transplant might be OK, if that would allow the pig's heart to be transplanted to the human recipient and not be rejected by the recipient's immune system.
Logged
John Dibble
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,732
Japan


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: January 27, 2005, 04:52:24 PM »

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Not explicitly, no. I do not support this as this is worded to me. I think guidelines should be established, but this 'none at all' seems to go too far. I don't feel we have nearly enough information for a full ban on human chimeras. Of course, I would advise caution and restraint to all scientists working on this type of thing - don't take it too far, too fast.
Logged
A18
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,794
Political Matrix
E: 9.23, S: -6.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: January 27, 2005, 05:33:03 PM »

Would you at least support a ban on transferring a nonhuman cell into a human embryo?
Logged
John Dibble
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,732
Japan


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: January 27, 2005, 06:30:18 PM »

Would you at least support a ban on transferring a nonhuman cell into a human embryo?

Possibly. Would depend on how it's written. I'd at least support some strict guidelines.
Logged
Bandit3 the Worker
Populist3
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,958


Political Matrix
E: -10.00, S: -9.92

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: January 27, 2005, 06:56:28 PM »

They need to ban this, and ban all human cloning as well.
Logged
John Dibble
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,732
Japan


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: January 27, 2005, 07:21:37 PM »

They need to ban this, and ban all human cloning as well.

I see no need to ban human cloning, so long as it is done under certain conditions.

1. Most importantly, human clones are considered just as human as those born naturally. They have all the same rights as us. For whatever reasons they were cloned, scientific or personal, those reasons do not make them slaves. They would be born differently, sure, but they would essentially have everything that the rest of us have, so I can think of no reason to deny them basic human rights.

2. Perfect animal cloning first. There are still complications there, and if we can't do it right with an animal then we can't do it right with a human. This somewhat extends from #1 - even if the cloning is experimental, since we are doing it with a being that has rights there should be the fewest risks of damaging that being as possible.

3. Another extension of #1. The first clones, heck, all clones, having the same rights we do, have the right to privacy. While the information that 'we have made a successful human clone' should be released, the identity of the clone should be kept anonymous, and upon reaching a reasonable age when the person can think well enough to make complex decisions, the identity can be released if the person wishes that information to be revealed. Otherwise, as I stated, let the person live their life in peace.

4. The clone, upon birth, be adopted by a loving family, preferably, but not limited to, those not involved in the actual experiments(this prevents the clone from being raised as a test subject rather than a person).

I think humanity could benefit greatly from cloning - imagine if we could clone human organs by themselves. What an advance for medicine that would be. Cloning is a science, a tool. But like all tools, it should not be abused, and such an advanced tool should be used with the utmost respect and caution.
Logged
David S
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,250


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: January 27, 2005, 11:32:04 PM »

There should be a ban on cloning socialists.
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: January 28, 2005, 12:13:53 AM »

Chimaeraism is a naturally occuring event, I recall. Why are they banning it?
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.032 seconds with 13 queries.