MO: Chilenski Strategies: McCaskill looking competitive!?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 29, 2024, 03:16:20 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2012 Elections
  2012 Senatorial Election Polls
  MO: Chilenski Strategies: McCaskill looking competitive!?		 « previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: MO: Chilenski Strategies: McCaskill looking competitive!?  (Read 411 times)
Miles
MilesC56
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,325
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: August 14, 2012, 06:32:56 AM »
I haven't heard of this firm, so I'd be more inclined to trust SUSA. Still, the President/Governor races match up well with SUSA's recent poll, but the Senate race here is a tossup, with McCaskill performing exactly the same as Obama.

Chilenski Strategies Poll: (SUSA numbers in parenthesis)

President
Romney (R)- 48% (45)
Obama (D)- 47% (44)

Senate
Akin (R)- 48% (51)
McCaskill (D)- 47% (40)

Governor
Nixon (D)- 53% (51)
Spence (R)- 39% (37)
Logged
Holmes
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,756
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -5.74

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: August 14, 2012, 06:35:44 AM »
I guess the presidential race is competitive maybe...?
Logged
Niemeyerite
JulioMadrid
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,804
Spain


Political Matrix
E: -8.65, S: -9.04

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: August 14, 2012, 06:52:42 AM »
It's really difficult to trust an unknown pollster, but I'm more inclined to believe an Obama-1/McCaskill-1 poll than an Obama-1/McCaskill-11 one... But I don't think Obama is THAT competitive in MO, either.
Logged
Snowstalker Mk. II
Snowstalker
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,414
Palestinian Territory, Occupied


Political Matrix
E: -7.10, S: -4.35

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: August 14, 2012, 04:48:00 PM »
Chances are Obama's doing better in suburbs while McCaskill's doing better in rural areas.
Logged
Holmes
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,756
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -5.74

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: August 14, 2012, 04:54:35 PM »
Duh, but they're both not doing particularly well in the rural areas anyway.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.027 seconds with 13 queries.