Democrats only... Who would you LEAST like to debate?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 29, 2024, 01:05:33 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Debate (Moderator: Torie)
  Democrats only... Who would you LEAST like to debate? 		« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Republicans... Which Conservative TV/Radio Personality would you least like to debate?
#1
Sean Hannity		  
#2
Rush Limbaugh		  
#3
Ann Coulter		  
#4
Joe Scarborough		  
#5
Michael Savage		  
#6
Ben Stein		  
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results
Total Voters: 12

Author Topic: Democrats only... Who would you LEAST like to debate?  (Read 911 times)
Moooooo
nickshepDEM
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,909


Political Matrix
E: -0.52, S: 3.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: January 20, 2005, 12:17:27 AM »
« edited: January 20, 2005, 12:21:00 AM by nickshepDEM »
on EDIT.... Poll question should read "DEMOCRATS ONLY" thanx

Democrats (or Greens&Left leaning Independents) from the above choices who would you least like to be engaged in a debate with on several factors like... Wit, Intimidation, Knowledge, Skill, Charisma etc.... (not shallow reasons like they stink or their ugly)

In other words who do you think you would have absoultley no chacne at beating in a debate?
Logged
Gabu
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,386
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -4.32, S: -6.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: January 20, 2005, 12:18:53 AM »
Ben Stein, mainly because he knows absolutely everything.
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: January 20, 2005, 12:19:35 AM »
Ben Stein, because he would get like a sentence out before the buzzer thing and it would still be smarter than anything I could say.
Logged
Moooooo
nickshepDEM
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,909


Political Matrix
E: -0.52, S: 3.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: January 20, 2005, 12:24:09 AM »
« Edited: January 20, 2005, 12:36:11 AM by nickshepDEM »
Hes smart, but I wouldnt be that intimidated by him.  Just about anyone could out wit Stein and use his borring personality against him in a debate.  Thats why I listed more factors than just knowledge.

For me it would be Scarborough.  But I cant really explain why.  There is just something about him that would intimidate me.  He comes off as very smart, yet very easy to comprehend.  Thats deadly in a debate.  Also, he seems like the type of guy that can easily slam any theory you put out there with simple comments like "Come on thats riculous".  He comes very arrogant and sometimes that is a good thing.
Logged
Smash255
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,452


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: January 20, 2005, 12:26:17 AM »
Probably Ben Stein.  He would put me to sleep so I wouldn't know what to respond to since I didn't hear anything he said because I was sleeping
Logged
BobOMac2k2
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 280


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: January 20, 2005, 12:39:35 AM »
Ben, very annoying...very.
Logged
Wakie
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,767


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: January 20, 2005, 01:21:25 AM »
Ben Stein is the one with the best command of the facts but debating Ann Coulter would be like debating a retarded person.
Logged
Dr. Cynic
Lawrence Watson
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,455
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.11, S: -6.09

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: January 20, 2005, 12:56:22 PM »
Ben Stien. He has a command of facts, that I can't match.
Logged
12th Doctor
supersoulty
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,584
Ukraine


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: January 20, 2005, 01:04:33 PM »
Quote from: nickshepDEM on January 20, 2005, 12:24:09 AM
Hes smart, but I wouldnt be that intimidated by him.  Just about anyone could out wit Stein and use his borring personality against him in a debate.  Thats why I listed more factors than just knowledge.


What in the Hell are you talking about?  No body on this forum could out smart Ben Stein.  He was a Rhodes Scholar, recived a perfect score on his SAT's and has an IQ of about 190.

His slow talking personality is just an act, he is acctually quite interesting to hear speak.  I've heard a few speeches by him.
Logged
Moooooo
nickshepDEM
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,909


Political Matrix
E: -0.52, S: 3.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: January 20, 2005, 01:11:46 PM »
« Edited: January 20, 2005, 01:20:41 PM by nickshepDEM »
Quote from: Senator Supersoulty on January 20, 2005, 01:04:33 PM
What in the Hell are you talking about?  No body on this forum could out smart Ben Stein.  He was a Rhodes Scholar, recived a perfect score on his SAT's and has an IQ of about 190.

His slow talking personality is just an act, he is acctually quite interesting to hear speak.  I've heard a few speeches by him.

Your right, what I meant to say is his borring personality would be a weakness.  But I never said he wasnt extremley intelligent. Could I beat him?  Of course not.  But I wouldnt fear him like I would some of the others on this list.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.027 seconds with 13 queries.