CA: Field Poll: Obama clobbers all Republicans
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 08:43:16 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2012 Elections
  2012 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
  CA: Field Poll: Obama clobbers all Republicans
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: CA: Field Poll: Obama clobbers all Republicans  (Read 1543 times)
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,181
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: February 23, 2012, 04:07:29 AM »



http://www.sacbee.com/2012/02/23/4284648/field-poll-obama-resurgent-in.html
Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,181
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: February 23, 2012, 04:14:05 AM »

It's hard to see how Santorum could be anywhere close to a "tie" with Obama nationally, with these kinds of numbers in CA.

These numbers make the polls showing Obama up by 5-10% nationally more credible.
Logged
Landslide Lyndon
px75
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,857
Greece


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: February 23, 2012, 04:30:31 AM »

California is one of those rare states where Romney's electability argument is legit.
Then again losing by 20 points instead of 30 doesn't make you look very good.
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,490
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: February 23, 2012, 04:48:29 AM »

Gingrich is doing better than Santorum here.

(Could the cartoon of Gingrich be any more unflattering btw? lol.)
Logged
redcommander
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,816
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: February 23, 2012, 05:09:30 AM »

If you factor in undecideds, the state would probably go 58 Obama-40 Romney if the election were held today. I don't see Romney finishing below 40% since Obama over performed in the state last time around.
Logged
Landslide Lyndon
px75
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,857
Greece


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: February 23, 2012, 05:17:28 AM »

If you factor in undecideds, the state would probably go 58 Obama-40 Romney if the election were held today. I don't see Romney finishing below 40% since Obama over performed in the state last time around.

Oh, I'm sure Mittens endorsing the Arizona anti-immigration law will do wonders for his numbers in California.
Logged
redcommander
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,816
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: February 23, 2012, 05:27:25 AM »

If you factor in undecideds, the state would probably go 58 Obama-40 Romney if the election were held today. I don't see Romney finishing below 40% since Obama over performed in the state last time around.

Oh, I'm sure Mittens endorsing the Arizona anti-immigration law will do wonders for his numbers in California.

The state has a PVI of D+7. He should at least be guaranteed a floor of 40% in a more favorable Republican year.
Logged
Miles
MilesC56
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,325
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: February 23, 2012, 02:40:36 PM »

It's hard to see how Santorum could be anywhere close to a "tie" with Obama nationally, with these kinds of numbers in CA.

These numbers make the polls showing Obama up by 5-10% nationally more credible.

I agree. Santorum does worse than Goldwater in this CA poll.
Logged
Хahar 🤔
Xahar
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,731
Bangladesh


Political Matrix
E: -6.77, S: 0.61

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: February 24, 2012, 03:12:48 AM »

If you factor in undecideds, the state would probably go 58 Obama-40 Romney if the election were held today. I don't see Romney finishing below 40% since Obama over performed in the state last time around.

Oh, I'm sure Mittens endorsing the Arizona anti-immigration law will do wonders for his numbers in California.

The state has a PVI of D+7. He should at least be guaranteed a floor of 40% in a more favorable Republican year.

I'm not sure why 2012 would be more favorable than 2008 in California.
Logged
redcommander
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,816
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: February 24, 2012, 04:23:20 AM »

If you factor in undecideds, the state would probably go 58 Obama-40 Romney if the election were held today. I don't see Romney finishing below 40% since Obama over performed in the state last time around.

Oh, I'm sure Mittens endorsing the Arizona anti-immigration law will do wonders for his numbers in California.

The state has a PVI of D+7. He should at least be guaranteed a floor of 40% in a more favorable Republican year.

I'm not sure why 2012 would be more favorable than 2008 in California.

You expect Obama to do better than 60% of the vote?
Logged
Ebowed
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,597


Political Matrix
E: 4.13, S: 2.09

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: February 24, 2012, 04:36:28 AM »

You expect Obama to do better than 60% of the vote?

Uh, in California?  Absolutely...
Logged
CLARENCE 2015!
clarence
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,927
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: February 24, 2012, 04:53:47 AM »

If Obama is leading  I am very concerned...
Logged
Niemeyerite
JulioMadrid
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,804
Spain


Political Matrix
E: -8.65, S: -9.04

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: February 24, 2012, 07:52:39 AM »

I also think Obama will break 60% in California. McCain was from the state next to CA and was a better candidate than Romney or Santorum are. And more moderate, too.

I know 2008 was a very, very bad year for republicans, and 2012 will probably be a better year. But Santorum vs. Romney will be a very tough battle, and the winner will be very damaged after the Convention. Obama doesn't have to fight against Clinton like he did in 2008... so hell have time to fundraise in California, campaign everywhere in the USA... And destroy Romney and Santorum in cash on hand. So, I think it's possible he could even break 66% if everything goes as expected...
Logged
AndrewTX
AndrewCT
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,091


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: February 24, 2012, 07:53:54 AM »

Obama is ahead? GAME CHANGER!
Logged
Snowstalker Mk. II
Snowstalker
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,414
Palestinian Territory, Occupied


Political Matrix
E: -7.10, S: -4.35

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: February 25, 2012, 11:46:47 PM »

California is one of those rare states where Romney's electability argument is legit.
Then again losing by 20 points instead of 30 doesn't make you look very good.

Right. Romney can win back affluent whites, but won't do much better with Hispanics. In a close election, Romney should get 42-43%-ish.
Logged
I'm JewCon in name only.
Klecly
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 917
United States


Political Matrix
E: 9.61, S: 6.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: February 27, 2012, 04:13:37 PM »

While I think 66% is a bit of a stretch, it is very likely that Obama wins 60%-63% in 2012.

I mean our nominee would have to be a conservative McGovern to lose 2/3rds of CA.

I say in BEST case for GOP:

58.6% Obama
40.1% Repub


What will prob. happen:

61.4% Obama
37.2% Repub
Logged
ajb
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 869
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: February 27, 2012, 04:20:12 PM »

I'd presume that Romney would do slightly worse with Hispanic voters than McCain did, all other things being equal, given their respective stances on immigration.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.045 seconds with 13 queries.