NH-CNN: Romney 47% Paul 17% Huntsman 13% Santorum 10% Gingrich 9%

[Mr. Morden]

This is only a poll of people who watched coverage of the Iowa caucuses on Tuesday night, so it's not a random sample of all likely NH voters, and so I'm not entering it into the database:

http://i2.cdn.turner.com/cnn/2012/images/01/04/topnhpostia.jan3.pdf

Romney 47%
Paul 17%
Huntsman 13%
Santorum 10%
Gingrich 9%
Bachmann 1%
Perry 0%

"People who watch new coverage of a live event are typically different from those who don't. Respondents for tonight's poll of Iowa caucus watchers were much older than all likely New Hampshire Republican primary voters (based on the December 21-27 CNN/Time/ORC International poll in New Hampshire), and more likely to describe themselves as Tea Party supporters. 79% of respondents on January 3 were over 50 years old (compared to 56% of all likely primary voters) and 47% of respondents on January 3 described themselves as Tea Party supporters (compared to 38% of all likely primary voters)."

[Simfan34]

Huntsman's rising!

[TheGlobalizer]

I'll wait for adults to do real polls.

[tmthforu94]

My take:
Mitt Romney is going to be attacked from all sides in the coming days, and he'll lose support, though it won't be enough to even make this a close race. Romney will probably receive right around 40%, which is annoying for me, since I'm trying to get a perfect prediction on here (I'm one of around 30 who predicted a Romney win in Iowa).

I think the biggest story will be who will take second - Huntsman has to have a strong second here to stay in this race. A second place would also be a huge boost to either Paul or Santorum.

We'll see. Probably won't be as intense as Iowa, though.

[Meeker]

This poll is completely worthless.