Men should be banned from

[Snowstalker Mk. II]

Obviously Option 1.

[tpfkaw]

If "men" is meant in the "mankind" sense and you get rid of the last three words, then I'm all on board.

[opebo]

I would go along with this as long as women were banned from voting on issues relating to prostitution.

[minionofmidas]

Men should be banned, full stop. With a hardship excemption for myself.

[FloridaRepublican]

Disagree.

[GMantis]

I'm going to be charitable and assume that you've suffered a temporary loss of sanity and are not being a troll on purpose.

[opebo]

Men should be banned, full stop.

You're extraordinarily tuned in to the female psyche there, Lewis.  Perhaps you are a girl.

[Snowstalker Mk. II]

None of you have a sense of humor.

Then again, this wasn't all that funny.

[Vosem]

None of you have a sense of humor.

Then again, this wasn't all that funny.

Herman Cain has an Atlas account.

[Teddy (IDS Legislator)]

This was supposed to be funny?

[FEMA Camp Administrator]

None of you have a sense of humor.

Then again, this wasn't all that funny.

Herman Cain has an Atlas account.

[Yelnoc]

I would go along with this as long as women were banned from voting on issues relating to prostitution.

lolwut

[Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.]

If "men" is meant in the "mankind" sense and you get rid of the last three words, then I'm all on board.

I'll amend my usual 'why do you hate representative democracy?' question.

Why do you hate civilization?

I would go along with this as long as women were banned from voting on issues relating to prostitution.

But women are the ones who actually are prostitutes, opebo-chan.

[tpfkaw]

If "men" is meant in the "mankind" sense and you get rid of the last three words, then I'm all on board.

I'll amend my usual 'why do you hate representative democracy?' question.

Why do you hate civilization?

I love civilization and hate the opposite of civilization, which is unprovoked force.

[Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.]

If "men" is meant in the "mankind" sense and you get rid of the last three words, then I'm all on board.

I'll amend my usual 'why do you hate representative democracy?' question.

Why do you hate civilization?

I love civilization and hate the opposite of civilization, which is unprovoked force.

I agree. Which is why there are laws. To prevent human existence from being characterized by brute force.

[tpfkaw]

If "men" is meant in the "mankind" sense and you get rid of the last three words, then I'm all on board.

I'll amend my usual 'why do you hate representative democracy?' question.

Why do you hate civilization?

I love civilization and hate the opposite of civilization, which is unprovoked force.

I agree. Which is why there are laws. To prevent human existence from being characterized by brute force.

So you agree that there is no situation in which unprovoked force is appropriate?

[Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.]

If "men" is meant in the "mankind" sense and you get rid of the last three words, then I'm all on board.

I'll amend my usual 'why do you hate representative democracy?' question.

Why do you hate civilization?

I love civilization and hate the opposite of civilization, which is unprovoked force.

I agree. Which is why there are laws. To prevent human existence from being characterized by brute force.

So you agree that there is no situation in which unprovoked force is appropriate?

Yes but I'm almost positive we would have very different definitions of both force and provocation.

[tpfkaw]

If "men" is meant in the "mankind" sense and you get rid of the last three words, then I'm all on board.

I'll amend my usual 'why do you hate representative democracy?' question.

Why do you hate civilization?

I love civilization and hate the opposite of civilization, which is unprovoked force.

I agree. Which is why there are laws. To prevent human existence from being characterized by brute force.

So you agree that there is no situation in which unprovoked force is appropriate?

Yes but I'm almost positive we would have very different definitions of both force and provocation.

Provocation: The use of force against another person.

Force: Threatening to cause or causing harm to another person, including bodily harm and/or confiscation/destruction of property.  (The second part is only for clarification, confiscation or destruction of a person's property obviously can only occur under the threat of bodily harm).

[Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.]

If "men" is meant in the "mankind" sense and you get rid of the last three words, then I'm all on board.

I'll amend my usual 'why do you hate representative democracy?' question.

Why do you hate civilization?

I love civilization and hate the opposite of civilization, which is unprovoked force.

I agree. Which is why there are laws. To prevent human existence from being characterized by brute force.

So you agree that there is no situation in which unprovoked force is appropriate?

Yes but I'm almost positive we would have very different definitions of both force and provocation.

Provocation: The use of force against another person.

Force: Threatening to cause or causing harm to another person, including bodily harm and/or confiscation/destruction of property.  (The second part is only for clarification, confiscation or destruction of a person's property obviously can only occur under the threat of bodily harm).

Hm. I suppose I have a some woolly conception of 'property' (or rather, I'm highly pessimistic about the usual ways in which large amounts of personal property are accumulated). I'd also add 'interrupting one's ability to lead a peaceful life/livelihood for one's personal gain beyond the same ability' to the definition of what constitutes 'force'.

[Rooney]

I find this idea to be a good one. Why does everyone want everything put to a vote anyway? Simply because 51% vote for something does that automatically make it a good idea? Something along the lines of abortion should only be decided by one voter: the person who is pregnant with the fetus. Nobody (man or woman) should get to vote on that personal decision.

[opebo]

I would go along with this as long as women were banned from voting on issues relating to prostitution.

lolwut

Obviously 'nice' females want to ban prostitution as it removes their leverage over men.  They should be disqualified from voting on the issue.

[Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.]

I would go along with this as long as women were banned from voting on issues relating to prostitution.

lolwut

Obviously 'nice' females want to ban prostitution as it removes their leverage over men.  They should be disqualified from voting on the issue.

Does the fact that the actual prostitutes are also female have any relevance to your thinking on the subject?

Also, what's wrong with having one area, just one, in which women have 'leverage' over men rather than the other way around, anyway? (Not to say that I agree with you that banning prostitution inherently constitutes that.)

[Free Palestine]

Are you retarded?

Was that directed at the OP or opebo?

[Queen Mum Inks.LWC]

None of you have a sense of humor.

Then again, this wasn't all that funny.

Yeah... you nailed it with the second sentence.

[Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.]

Are you retarded?

Was that directed at the OP or opebo?

Yes.