Kentucky???
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 15, 2024, 11:15:28 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2012 Elections
  Kentucky???
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] 3
Author Topic: Kentucky???  (Read 4303 times)
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,201
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #25 on: August 11, 2011, 01:29:46 AM »

Kentucky will be about 59-40 for the Republican next year, especially with Rick Perry on the ticket. With some other candidates like Romney or Bachmann, the margin could be about 2-3% closer. But let's wait for a SurveyUSA poll out of the state.

Not a chance in hell Perry does better than Romney.

I wouldn't be so sure of that. Of course, if PPP would poll KY now, Romney would do better against Obama, because Perry isn't really known yet to most of the KY voters. I think Romney has a 80% name recognition and Perry a 40% one. But if SurveyUSA or PPP would poll KY in December, I think Perry would have more appeal than Romney in a state like KY.
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #26 on: August 11, 2011, 01:30:12 AM »

Sarah Palin is the only candidate that would lose states like Kentucky.

No.
Logged
Bandit3 the Worker
Populist3
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,964


Political Matrix
E: -10.00, S: -9.92

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #27 on: August 11, 2011, 01:30:52 AM »

I wouldn't be so sure of that. Of course, if PPP would poll KY now, Romney would do better against Obama, because Perry isn't really known yet to most of the KY voters.

Perry is known. And we don't like him.
Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,201
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #28 on: August 11, 2011, 01:32:08 AM »

I wouldn't be so sure of that. Of course, if PPP would poll KY now, Romney would do better against Obama, because Perry isn't really known yet to most of the KY voters.

Perry is known. And we don't like him.

Maybe known to you because you are a nerd, but unknown to the vast majority of actual voters.
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #29 on: August 11, 2011, 01:32:58 AM »

I wouldn't be so sure of that. Of course, if PPP would poll KY now, Romney would do better against Obama, because Perry isn't really known yet to most of the KY voters.

Perry is known. And we don't like him.

Humor us and ask someone that doesn't live inside your house if they know and like Perry. Go ahead and ask more than two people if you really want to make us happy.
Logged
King
intermoderate
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,356
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #30 on: August 11, 2011, 01:36:16 AM »

Sarah Palin is the only candidate that would lose states like Kentucky.

No.

She's only beating Obama by 2 points in Utah.
Logged
Bandit3 the Worker
Populist3
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,964


Political Matrix
E: -10.00, S: -9.92

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #31 on: August 11, 2011, 01:36:54 AM »

Humor us and ask someone that doesn't live inside your house if they know and like Perry. Go ahead and ask more than two people if you really want to make us happy.

I already have.

If Perry wins Kentucky, it means that either the election is rigged, or GOP supporters have moved so far away from populated areas that the rural areas make up their whole margin.
Logged
King
intermoderate
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,356
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #32 on: August 11, 2011, 01:38:09 AM »

Humor us and ask someone that doesn't live inside your house if they know and like Perry. Go ahead and ask more than two people if you really want to make us happy.

I already have.

If Perry wins Kentucky, it means that either the election is rigged, or GOP supporters have moved so far away from populated areas that the rural areas make up their whole margin.

Well this is true regardless.
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #33 on: August 11, 2011, 01:42:18 AM »

Sarah Palin is the only candidate that would lose states like Kentucky.

No.

She's only beating Obama by 2 points in Utah.

And you believe that that's accurate? I understand that the woman is very unpopular but when it comes down to it, people in states like Utah and Kentucky will vote for her over someone they dislike even more (the President).
Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,201
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #34 on: August 11, 2011, 01:43:40 AM »

Humor us and ask someone that doesn't live inside your house if they know and like Perry. Go ahead and ask more than two people if you really want to make us happy.

I already have.

If Perry wins Kentucky, it means that either the election is rigged, or GOP supporters have moved so far away from populated areas that the rural areas make up their whole margin.

Rural KY voters may be registered Democrats, but are nothing else than Republicans.

And these "Democrats" will end up voting for Perry by a really big margin.
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #35 on: August 11, 2011, 01:44:41 AM »

Humor us and ask someone that doesn't live inside your house if they know and like Perry. Go ahead and ask more than two people if you really want to make us happy.

I already have.

If Perry wins Kentucky, it means that either the election is rigged

Either the election is rigged? Is there really another option? I thought it was always rigged when a Republican wins, Bandit. And somehow you still have the guts to say that Republicans whine that elections are stolen...

And to think that someone said to me, "At least Bandit is moving away from the whole 'the election was stolen' routine." I knew you wouldn't let us down.
Logged
Bandit3 the Worker
Populist3
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,964


Political Matrix
E: -10.00, S: -9.92

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #36 on: August 11, 2011, 01:46:12 AM »

Rural KY voters may be registered Democrats, but are nothing else than Republicans.

And these "Democrats" will end up voting for Perry by a really big margin.

Remember, Kentucky has this little thing called Elliott County.
Logged
King
intermoderate
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,356
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #37 on: August 11, 2011, 01:50:36 AM »

Sarah Palin is the only candidate that would lose states like Kentucky.

No.

She's only beating Obama by 2 points in Utah.

And you believe that that's accurate? I understand that the woman is very unpopular but when it comes down to it, people in states like Utah and Kentucky will vote for her over someone they dislike even more (the President).

It could be 10-15 points off and still a joke for a Republican in Utah.  

I disagree that they do not dislike Obama even more.  Palin wears her negative aspects on her sleeve and has only one skill: digging herself in a deeper hole.  Once you don't like somebody, you don't like somebody.

Utah, Wyoming, Idaho, Oklahoma, and Alabama might still vote Palin, but by the end of a long campaign, it would take a lot more than our current situation for her to win more than that.

She has nowhere to go but down, which is why she won't run and if she did she wouldn't get nominated as even Bachmann and Perry are ten times better.
Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,201
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #38 on: August 11, 2011, 01:54:38 AM »

Rural KY voters may be registered Democrats, but are nothing else than Republicans.

And these "Democrats" will end up voting for Perry by a really big margin.

Remember, Kentucky has this little thing called Elliott County.

Probably a bunch of poor, white hippies concentrated in these few counties ... Wink
Logged
CatoMinor
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,007
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #39 on: August 11, 2011, 03:03:17 AM »


Humor us and ask someone that doesn't live inside your house if they know and like Perry. Go ahead and ask more than two people if you really want to make us happy.
He'd likely find more people that like him there in KY than I would here in Texas were we've actually lived under his reign. Tongue
Logged
pbrower2a
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,921
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #40 on: August 11, 2011, 09:42:19 AM »

The case for any Republican winning against Obama in Kentucky in 2012:

1. The state can vote for Democrats, but only Southern moderates. The state hasn't voted for a Northern liberal since JFK in 1960. Eisenhower won the state twice. Gore forgot his Southern roots in 2000 and lost the state.

Beginning with 1952 with Kentucky:

northern liberals 1 (JFK)
southern moderates 3 (LBJ, Carter 1976, Clinton twice)
Republicans 10 (Eisenhower twice, Nixon twice, Reagan twice, GHWB 1992, Dubya twice, McCain)

Does anyone expect Barack Obama to be an exception?

2. The state wasn't close in 2008. The news media called Kentucky promptly for John McCain in a bad year for Republicans. A state voting for the losing side in a Presidential election by a 10% or higher margin suggests that the partisan edge in that state is decisively with the Party that lost that election.

3. This is the state that gave America Senator Mitch McConnell, who has said that his first priority is to ensure that Barack Obama be a one-term President. Such suggests that running against Barack Obama is good politics in Kentucky even if it might be bad politics for someone from Ohio.

4. This is the state that elected Rand Paul despite his staffers roughing up a heckler.

5. The President will not be campaigning for any Senatorial candidate in Kentucky.

Now the other side:

1. The Republicans can nominate someone absolutely nuts.

2. Polarization that has so marked the Presidential elections beginning in 2000 may have abated. In a 53-46 election like 1944 with little interstate polarization (outside of the Solid South) the President could win all but the absolutely-safest states for Republicans.

3. We don't have any recent (post-election) polls for Kentucky.
Logged
memphis
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,959


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #41 on: August 11, 2011, 09:49:56 AM »

Sadly, bandit is following the same Phil logic from the 2008 race. Obama can't be doing well in Pennsylvania or white Philly. I know people and they're all against him.
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #42 on: August 11, 2011, 10:15:52 AM »



I disagree that they do not dislike Obama even more.  Palin wears her negative aspects on her sleeve and has only one skill: digging herself in a deeper hole.  Once you don't like somebody, you don't like somebody.

And they dislike Obama, too. They happen to at least agree with Palin on policy. Your points here are just laughable. With 9% unemployment and another global economic crisis in the making, states like Utah are going to be tough for Palin to win? Please.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Idaho would even be a battle ground? Yeah. Ok.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

That makes zero sense.

 
Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

I've said that for over a year anyway.
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #43 on: August 11, 2011, 10:20:02 AM »

Sadly, bandit is following the same Phil logic from the 2008 race. Obama can't be doing well in Pennsylvania or white Philly. I know people and they're all against him.

Memphis, I know you dislike me because I don't have time for your idiocy but don't compare Bandit's "knowing" people to what I said in 2008. I'm actually involved in politics. I actually participate in the community. Bandit is so isolated from reality that he declared his surrounding area a new country.

Oh, and I never said or suggested that "they're all against him." So stop the trolling. Feel free to dislike me but don't exaggerate what I've said in the past.
Logged
Bandit3 the Worker
Populist3
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,964


Political Matrix
E: -10.00, S: -9.92

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #44 on: August 11, 2011, 11:25:20 AM »

With 9% unemployment and another global economic crisis in the making, states like Utah are going to be tough for Palin to win?

In northern Kentucky, 9% unemployment is actually a huge improvement.
Logged
Snowstalker Mk. II
Snowstalker
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,414
Palestinian Territory, Occupied


Political Matrix
E: -7.10, S: -4.35

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #45 on: August 11, 2011, 11:39:32 AM »

Yes, against opponents that would play well in the state on social issues during a horrible economy, Obama would absolutely win the state.

Bachmann and Perry are both nuts, and people know it.

And Perry has a terrible economic record when you look just below the surface.
Logged
King
intermoderate
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,356
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #46 on: August 11, 2011, 05:13:12 PM »

Phil, Palin is so obviously awful that unemployment can be 15% and people would not vote Palin because it's obvious that she is not capable of doing better.
Logged
Zot
Rookie
**
Posts: 36


Political Matrix
E: 8.00, S: 4.87

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #47 on: August 11, 2011, 10:33:13 PM »

Obama will lose Kentucky regardless of who he runs against.
Logged
DS0816
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,200
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #48 on: August 12, 2011, 08:51:12 AM »

Kentucky has gone the way of Tennessee and Illinois and Delaware: out of the bellwether camp into the PVI strongly advantaged for a given party.
Logged
Zot
Rookie
**
Posts: 36


Political Matrix
E: 8.00, S: 4.87

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #49 on: August 14, 2011, 09:30:08 AM »

I'm glad Kentucky has moved the right way.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.058 seconds with 12 queries.