How many Rochambeau posts is a Professor post worth?

[I spent the winter writing songs about getting better]

Rochambeau had 14755, The Professor has 50. That's a ratio of 1:295, but I'd say The Professor's history as a whole is worth more than Rochambeau's entire posting history. If you had to give an exact ratio, what would it be?

[Swing low, sweet chariot. Comin' for to carry me home.]

funny you should ask that question...

[Teddy (IDS Legislator)]

14755

[Antonio the Sixth]

[minionofmidas]

Depends which ones of Rochambeau's. The vast majority of them taken together are worth less than each and every Professor post, of course. There are some outliers. I don't know if any of them outweigh the least valuable Professor post, but a few probably come close.

[I spent the winter writing songs about getting better]

Depends which ones of Rochambeau's. The vast majority of them taken together are worth less than each and every Professor post, of course. There are some outliers. I don't know if any of them outweigh the least valuable Professor post, but a few probably come close.

That's why I'm asking for the average. If you consider The Professor's history to be superior to Rochambeau's cumulative history, that means he averages over 300 times the quality per post.

And the only Rochambeau posts I can see being of anywhere near the value of a Professor post is his not so bad contributions to the Hot Girls Thread.

[Oswald Acted Alone, You Kook]

He did contribute greatly in my old "How did the Presidents vote in Presidential elections" thread.

But I don't understand why he was banned anyway.

[I spent the winter writing songs about getting better]

He did contribute greatly in my old "How did the Presidents vote in Presidential elections" thread.

But I don't understand why he was banned anyway.

Because this forum's moderation policy is completely without morals and the guidance of Christ.

[Joe Republic]

He did contribute greatly in my old "How did the Presidents vote in Presidential elections" thread.

But I don't understand why he was banned anyway.

Because this forum's moderation policy is completely without morals and the guidance of Christ.

Oh shiv, was it Christ we were supposed to be guided by?  I thought it was Odin this whole time.  Well, this is embarrassing.

[MASHED POTATOES. VOTE!]

He did contribute greatly in my old "How did the Presidents vote in Presidential elections" thread.

But I don't understand why he was banned anyway.

Because this forum's moderation policy is completely without morals and the guidance of Christ.

Oh shiv, was it Christ we were supposed to be guided by?  I thought it was Odin this whole time.  Well, this is embarrassing.

He is dissapointed...

[Torie]

He did contribute greatly in my old "How did the Presidents vote in Presidential elections" thread.

But I don't understand why he was banned anyway.

Because this forum's moderation policy is completely without morals and the guidance of Christ.

Are you OK BRTD?

[The Mikado]

Hmm...I must've been getting the wrong guidance.  Like the mighty Arjuna, I asked Lord Krishna if it was not wrong to end a posting career and ban someone.  He told me that people would view the moderators as cowards if we did not and told me that people should not mourn on the day one begins posting or the day one ends posting, for the ending of posting leads to that person beginning posting under another username.  The cycle is unbroken, it is decreed.

[All Along The Watchtower]

He did contribute greatly in my old "How did the Presidents vote in Presidential elections" thread.

But I don't understand why he was banned anyway.

Because this forum's moderation policy is completely without morals and the guidance of Christ.

Are you OK BRTD?

[Хahar 🤔]

Hmm...I must've been getting the wrong guidance.  Like the mighty Arjuna, I asked Lord Krishna if it was not wrong to end a posting career and ban someone.  He told me that people would view the moderators as cowards if we did not and told me that people should not mourn on the day one begins posting or the day one ends posting, for the ending of posting leads to that person beginning posting under another username.  The cycle is unbroken, it is decreed.

As moderators, it is your duty to ban.